Reviews

20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Buzz on Maggie (2005–2006)
1/10
The Buzz on the Buzz on Maggie.
18 February 2008
So a few years back, Disney Channel was doing pretty good. It featured a menagerie of shows that were popular with the younger crowd, tweens, teens, and even adults. Among these shows was the mega hit, Kim Possible, which rightfully gained a huge fan based, tons of merchandise (Still got my Rufus doll! ;)), and brought in the moolah for the monkeys in suits that run Disney.

So what was the only thing to do? Why, cancel Kim Possible and replace her with Lizzie Maguire in a fly suit! It made perfect sense! If you're a Disney Exec with the brains of an apple snail, that is.

Needless to say, fans were flabbergasted. "THIS?" They cried. "You ****heads cancel Kim Possible and THIS is what you give us in turn?" OK, I was the one who said it, but the feeling was pretty much the same throughout the KP fan base.

'The Buzz on the Maggie' was pretty much doomed. What could have been a cute concept was undermined by lousy characterization, irritating voices, unoriginal plots and a resentment toward it for replacing Kim.

The end of the story is well known: Head Monkey Eisner got the boot and so did 'The Buzz on Maggie.' The sixty-five episode rule that Eisner instated was tossed and Kim was picked up for another season. The Little Fly with the bug eyes and the purple hair was quickly forgotten as we crowded around our sets and waited for Kim to return.

Flies live for a week, so they say. Maggie got two seasons. She should consider herself lucky.
6 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flushed Away (2006)
3/10
I came, I saw, I honestly didn't care for it...
12 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A few months ago, I was involved in a debate with another IMDb poster (Hey, Kmadden) about this film. The poster insisted that if I gave 'Flushed Away' a chance, I would like it. Based partially on that argument, I agreed to watch the film.

'Flushed Away' has good intentions (At least on Aardman's part), but lacks the strength to pull it all together. Its best asset is sewer rat/boat captain, Rita (Played by Kate Winselt), who, IMO, should have been the movie's main character instead of Roddy (Hugh Jackman). Rita's cool, tough, and interesting, while Roddy spends much of his screen time sniveling.

One of the things that bothered me most about 'FA' is the repetition of jokes that aren't funny to begin with. When Roddy gets hit in the crouch, the film makes sure he gets hit five more times immediately. "My name's Shocky," says one of Rita's brothers, who then electrocutes Roddy at least three times. My tolerance for cheap gags that involve pain is at an all time low.

I won't waste time griping about Katzenberg's kleptomaniac tendencies toward Pixar (One similar film's a coincidence, five's a rip off.), but I will say I'm disappointed in Aardman. They can do (and have done) so much better. Try harder next time, guys.
3 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dave the Barbarian (2004–2005)
Never judge a barbarian by his cover...
26 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Dave gets a lot of flack from viewers who I suspect haven't even watched the show. I too was wary, but seeing that Danny Cooksey was in the title role (Budnick forever, though "Salute your Shorts" may be rotting in Herb's vault somewhere), I felt obliged to tune in at least once. I'm very glad I did.

From afar, Dave may look bogus, but it's actually a smartly written show. A combination of Monty Python and the Holy Grail with Rocky and Bulliwinkle, with enough scatological humor to please Rocko and Angry Beavers fans, but not to the "throw up" extreme (As in, yuck!, Catdog), it takes constant jabs at "heroes" like He-Man and Conan. For example, in the Barbarian-Mitzvah episode, Dave's tester is a cloaked Skeletor-like figure who introduces himself as...Gloria (Did I mention, there's Family Guy-esq humor to spare, though it's considerably toned down.).

Dave's parents are out fighting all the evil in the world, and they take their job very causally, sending home souvenirs (which sometimes try to kill the kids,), instructing everyone to brush their teeth while chained to a wall, etc. Most shows would have the parents fighting a specific type of evil, which would probably ultimately doom the kingdom, but for Dave's parents, all the evil in the world is good enough.

My one problem is Candy, who assumes a Lizzie Maguire attitude throughout the show, which dooms her character to stereotype. But I'm being to wonder if she's truly that type of character or supposed to be a parody. At least she does some awesome martial arts.

Everybody loves Twinkle the Marvel Horse. A "cute" magical pony with a sick, twisted mind, it's not unusual for Twinkle to come out of nowhere in the middle of a show and start singing about rabid rats and other tortures. For this stroke of pure genius, the show's writers should be upheld.

In short, give this show a shot. If it was on Cartoon Network or Nick (Well, probably not Nick. Worthless piece of scumbag trash that network's become), it would probably be a classic by now. Like many great shows though (How many can YOU name?), it's doomed on the wrong channel.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
If only...
4 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Peter and the Wolf is a fine little gem, but seriously marred by Sterling Halloway's narration. I mean come on, do we really need him commenting on everyone's actions, begging Peter to, "Do something quick!" It's not only distracting, it takes away from the music as well.

Not that "Peter" is without hope. In fact, its finest moments are in the beginning when the characters are introduced with the music (To this day, "The Cat", known in this film as Sasha, is one of my favorite pieces.). Detail is meticulous; words are written in Russian when the average viewer wouldn't even notice, and watch the Wolf as he climbs up the tree and splinters wood everywhere.

But honestly, Sterling Halloway, fine as he is playing Winnie the Pooh, adds nothing. In fact, he lessens the impact of what's going on. It would have been much better to let the music tell the story and have the characters themselves move in pantomime. If only...
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rock-A-Doodle (1991)
2/10
Rock-a-Snoozle
20 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Why do I review (or even watch) Don Bluth films? They're so depressing. I haven't been happy with the man since The Land Before Time (Though I briefly smiled for Anastasia. If only it weren't for that darn Pooka...).

Our story begins in a book on a farm. Right away, The Farm is identified as the perfect place to be, although there's no farmer, no crops, and I don't recall seeing a barn. Everyone on this little farm has a job. Of course, Chantacleer's job (to bring up the sun) is the only job identified; everyone else just lays around or joins in when he randomly belts out a tune.

You can imagine how obnoxious this can be after awhile, what with all this random singing on the farm with no farmer. So obnoxious, the Grand Duke of Owls has decided to kill them. Normally, this would be bad, but after five minutes, it's pretty obvious that they'd probably be better off dead. So he gets Chantacleer kicked off the farm, causing the sun to down, and darkness to fall. Meanwhile, this Duke planning to eat all these 'cute' creatures. For this, he's bad guy? Sounds pretty noble to me.

Meanwhile, in the real world, it's raining. This is somehow connected to Chantacleer leaving in the story, but only Edmond, son of the missing farmer, knows this. Everyone else figures it's just a random flash flood (Oh how foolish. Don't all monsoons have to do with barnyard fowl?). So he goes to the window and starts to scream for Chantacleer at the top of his lungs. Who's the villain now, huh? Anyhow, he hits his head, gets turned into a cat, goes on an adventure in the city, finds the rooster (but not the farmer), and wakes up muttering, "You were there, and you were there, and you were there..."

There are several problems with what I refer to as the Beginning-of-the-End for Bluth. But I beefed an awful lot in my Thumbelina review, so I'll start off with the good: Some of the voices, particularly Eddie Deezen (Who later immortalized Mandark) and Phil Harris (Who deserved a better last bow than this.) are quite good. Unfortuantly, they're undermined by Edmond (More on this later.). Rock-a-Doodle does the thing Thumbelina never did: Make me laugh, and that's why it gets a two instead of a one. One scene. The kitchen with Hans and the Duke, where Uncle Dukie utters the line, "If I kill my nephew, will it be murder or charity?" The pint sized pipsqueak and her prince never even came close.

Now the bad. Edmond is completely unappealing. His speech impediment is merely distracting as first, but by the "We'll all dwown." speech, he's annoying as red ants up the butt. At times, you can't even understand him (I have mixed feelings on that.). Hiring a kid with a speech problem, just for the 'cute factor' is always a bad idea (Do you see Mara Wilson and her lisp on the cover of People? Dakota Fanning, on the other hand, talks clear as a bell, can actually act, and is worth ten times her weight in gold.), unless it makes sense to the script (such as in 'Paulie' where Paulie the Parrot helped the little girl with her stutter.).

Hans the nephew, 'The funny character', isn't. The movie practically forces him on us, and when it becomes obvious he's not working with the script, we are actually reminded that he's supposed to be funny ("He was more a hoot than he was dangerous." or something along those lines.). Never, never, NEVER tell who your funny character is. Let the audience find out for themselves. Or better yet, don't have a specific 'funny' man, but let everyone be humorous on their own in different ways (Such as Monsters Inc.).

I guess the worse part is, we don't care. If I don't care about at least one main character, or a character's motivations, or even what's going to happen to that character, then the movie's failed. Rock-a-doodle failed. I'm not sure it ever had a chance. And maybe that's why the farmer ran away.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sesame Street (1969– )
Beautiful and bitter memories...
19 December 2003
I wrote in another review on this site about how I was born to a military family stationed in Germany, Land of No Cable (And the world's best chocolate, but that's another story.).

Anyway, one of the few kid's shows on TV that my grandparents didn't have to record and send over was Sesame Street, and the only one that was on the entire eight years we were there (Eureka's Castle was on for bit, but then one day it vanished. Same thing with Lampchops.). On my dad's side of the family, everyone had a Sesame Street character that they had a bond with (Dad's was Cookie Monster), and naturally, I followed the tradition by latching on to Ernie. Many a night I could be heard singing "Rubber Ducky" in the tub (I had two Rubber Duckies, but one got chucked because it got moldy, I think). To this day, I still hold Ernie dear to my heart (I even have a "Tickle Me Ernie", much, much cuter than "Tickle Me Elmo"!)

Not only did Sesame Street give me Ernie to love and make me laugh, but like everyone else who watched this show, it taught me to read and count. Then one day, this obnoxious bear showed up on Sesame Street, whining about Goldilocks stealing his porridge. I hoped he wouldn't be a permanent addition to the cast. Everyday, I'd turn on the set, and there he was, screeching in that high pitched voice of his. Soon, I stopped watching Sesame Street because I was so sick of Baby Bear. I was seven years old, and I had been watching Sesame Street for seven years.

Over the years, I did what all kids do, grew up. But about three years ago, I turned on Sesame Street again, and BABY BEAR IS STILL THERE!!! Not only that, some doofus gave Elmo a twenty minute segment, in which he spends most of those twenty minutes hopping around singing, "Dee dee da dee, Elmo's World!" over and over! And BABY BEAR IS STILL THERE!!! Horrible still, I hardly ever get to see my beloved Ernie and his Ol' Buddy Bert anymore. Worse of all, BABY BEAR IS STILL THERE!!!

So yes, Elmo may have ruined Sesame Street permanently (Unless God decides to raise Jim Henson from the dead), but for me, the death of Sesame Street came with the introduction of Baby Bear. So thanks a lot, you big throw rug! I hope the rest of the cast gets wise and turns you into a fur coat!
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
At last! A movie Lifetime hasn't screwed up!
9 September 2003
It's no secret. Lifetime is a very sick network. Lifetime thinks we want to see movies about women who are raped or beaten or cheaten or stalked or have an affair. So when I first heard of "Defending Our Kids" I had mixed emotions. First, I was estatic to hear that Annie Potts (My all time favorite actress) was in a new movie. I had also heard of the real Julie Posey and was interested in seeing her story on TV. But I knew Lifetime has a habit of putting one or more of the above in their films. In fact, if it weren't for Annie Potts, I probably would have skipped out on this all together.

Luckily, Lifetime got a clue (at least with this movie) and skipped the sex scene. They also managed to conviently "forget" about Julie Posey being raped as a teen by a stranger. As with all Lifetime movies, the subject matter is adult and should be viewed by a parent before letting anyone under the age of twelve see it. Otherwise, I enjoyed it. Annie Potts is excellent (as always), and the other actors and actresses aren't bad either. I managed to stay interested throughout the entire thing and didn't change the channel once or feel embarassed.

Now pardon me whilst I avoid "Sex and the Single Mom."
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not so good.
8 May 2003
Someone asked why Hubie wanted to get the pebble for Marina. Well, as the film explains before the feature, penguins really do give stones to their mate in the wild. This part I can understand. It's the same as a guy wanting to get the perfect ring to let his girl know he loves her.

But the film's still not that great. In fact, it's Jim Belushi (Coach Wittenburg from Hey Arnold) that makes the thing worth a tiny peek. The rest of the film falls flatter than a penguin on ice. Hopefully, this will be one my sisters never find. On the other hand, I'm probably not that lucky.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thumbelina (1994)
Bleck.
8 May 2003
I can't tell you all the horrible things about this paper thin piece of poop, but I can point out the worst:

Thumbelina was WUSS! Not since Cinderella has there been a weaker female lead! Sure near the end, after she thought Cornelious was dead, she started to act like a real woman (Refusing to marry the mole, stomping on the frog's foot, ect.), but of course as soon as that stupid bird rescued her, she was back to her old self ("I almost married the mole!" She nasally whines. "Well, I don't LOVE the mole!").

And speaking of the bird, who makes Pepe LePew look politically correct...Gaucmole or whatever his name is. Boy was he grating. And even worse, he OPENED the film! Yikes!

All the little tiny bugs who were so darn "cute" it was sickening. I wish there had been a giant can of Raid. In the words of Plato, "It's too cute! Need hatred..." Oh wait. Maybe that was Plankton. Never mind.

As others have said, the songs are terrible. Let's see, we've the bird singing the opening song, not once but TWICE, a big "A Whole New World" rip off, a singing toad quartet that goes so fast that you need to put it on closed captioning to understand, and that's just for starters.

Well, the bell's going to ring. I better sign off with this warning: You love sickly sweet Disney films where the heroine has no brains, you'll probably love this. But, if you want to see a film where girls kick butt and can take care of themselves, steer clear.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
See Spot Run (2001)
As bad as it looks.
23 April 2003
Incredibly bad movie about a numbskull mailman (It's David Arquette! Of course he's not going to be Einstein!) who has to look after his neighbor's kid, and then finds himself also taking care of a big slobbering mutt targeted by mobsters.

Almost as bad (if not worse) than this year's Kangaroo Crap...er, Jack. Will mostly likely appeal to young pre-teen boys between nine and eleven who have generously donated the left half of their brain to science.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
We watched this in Driver's Ed a few weeks ago.
19 April 2003
The story focuses on Lizzie, Janie and Kate (Gee, really original names people.), three best friends since kindergarten. Kate's the sickly sweet one, Janie's the rebel, and Lizzie's somewhere in-between. Lizzie has a crush on Janie's dumb jock brother, and the feeling is mutual.

Lizzie and Janie (who are none too bright)'s favorite past time is to get smashed on the weekend with vodka and beer. One night, they drive home drunk and end up crashing. Lizzie lives, Janie (the interesting one) doesn't. Now Lizzie's on trial for vehicular homicide, Janie's mother's got a thirst for vengeance (She does a good job of making us wish she has been in the car), and Dumb Jock Brother's not speaking to Lizzie.

The movie is well meaning, but so completely corny, it kills the message off. And for some reason, Lizzie's mom looks too old for Lizzie's dad (Just my opinion, people.). So don't drink and drive, and you won't have to watch this movie (unless you take Coach Brown's class).
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Lion King (1994)
With apologies to my friend Sara:
19 April 2003
Animation's crowning achievement? I don't think so! Sure it looks great, sounds great (except for that annoying "Can you feel the love tonight"), made tons of money, but it certainly pales compared to something like Beauty and the Beast. If anything deserves to be called "Animation's Crowning Achievement", it's Beauty and the Beast (And I usually don't go around giving praise to Disney's non-Pixar films!). In that, you have a connection to the characters that is noticeably lacking in this film (And the music and story are better too.).

The Lion King is ok, not great, but ten times better than its sequel. I'd still rather curl up with Toy Story or Monsters Inc. than this though.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
ABC Afterschool Specials: One Too Many (1985)
Season 13, Episode 7
Ok
19 April 2003
It's better than the other movie we watched in Driver's Ed even if we didn't get to finish it. I thought Beth and Tim were pretty cute together and I can relate to her and the way she reacted to every thing going on around her. I thought they were both pretty dumb for agreeing to go out with Eric and Tim so fast though (Hello? You never go out with strangers, even ones your own age!). So, yeah. It's better than some anti-drinking movies I can think of.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aladdin (1994–1995)
Ugh...
18 April 2003
Take the movie "Aladdin", kill Aladdin's personality, take away Robin Williams, mix bad animation with bad jokes, throw in boring plot lines, and basically you've got Aladdin the TV series. I don't what's worse: Aladdin the TV series, or Tarzan the TV series, which is basically a rip off of Aladdin. Do yourself a favor and watch "Buzz Lightyear of Star Command" instead. It's superior in every way.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sorry, but no one can do Buzz like Tim Allen.
8 March 2003
I don't know why, but Patrick Warburton can't make "To Infinity and Beyond" sound as cool as Tim Allen did.

This show is probably the best cartoon Disney's put out in years, a million years ahead of that stupid Tarzan series that's in front of it. XR is my favorite, with Zurg a close second (Oddly, he comes off more as comic relief than scary.). The only thing I dislike about this show is Mira Nova. Something about Mira rubs me the wrong way (It seemed like she was flirting with Buzz in some episodes, a big No-No-Leave-Him-For-Jessie in my book), although I'm slowly warming up to her.

In short, this series is mostly cool. If you love Toy Story, you'll probably love, or at least like, this.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why does Hanna-Barbera give all their dogs speech impediments?
24 December 2002
Think about it: Scooby, Dino, Astro. No one can understand any of them. Now to the review:

My mom claims this show was so popular because it was scary. Well, maybe in those days, but its kinda lost its touch.

Not to mention unlikable characters. Face it, everyone on this show is a stereotype, and Scooby is the ugliest dog in cartoon history (although Shaggy gives him a run for the money.). I don't care if Hanna and Barbera were pioneers in TV animation. This one should have been forgotten along with Jabber Jaws.

This show gets boring after one episode. I don't know how it lasted for two seasons, much less so many years. I wish Cartoon Network would stop pushing Scooby so much and start concentrating on their superior shows, like Time Squad. That's far better than this out date rubbish.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Golden Girls (1985–1992)
My friends called me stupid for liking this show...
23 December 2002
To heck with them.

This show has it all, comedy, drama, romance, did I mention comedy? The Golden Girls is a golden show. My favorite character is Sophia, but my favorite episode is the second episode of the two parter where Rose goes into cardiac arrest and has the dream that they're all heads!

I was disappointed in the ending of the last episode, though. I was expecting a flashback through the years and a song, like other shows, but no. Dorothy just walked out the door, the girls began to cry, fade to black. Oh well, the show is still good. No, great. This show is one of the best of all time.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's not a Tumor!!!
22 December 2002
My mom wouldn't let me see this for years. Finally I snuck it while she was out. The ending wasn't as scary as she (and everyone else) said it was. In fact, it wasn't scary at all. Suspenseful, but not scary.

It has its moments. Parts are predictable (*sarcasm* Gee, who knew Kimble and Joyce were going to fall in love?), but the rest is ok.

Violent, yes. Profanity, yes. Comedy, mediocre. I recommend it on a rainy afternoon when the little kids are out and nothing better is on. Don't expect a screaming laughing fall off the couch and roll on the floor reaction though.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Part of my childhood.
21 December 2002
My Dad is retired military, so we lived in Germany for eight years. We didn't have cable, so my Grandparents in the states used to tape cartoons for me and send them over. One of these tapes was full of Christmas specials. As far back as I can remember, my Christmas has been filled with Charlie Brown, Frosty and Rudolph. None are remembered as fondly though as the Grinch. I used to sit and watch it over and over. My favorite scene is when the Grinch smiles after getting "A wonderfully, awful idea."

The new one is just ehhhhh...It gives a background story to the Grinch and his feelings, which defeats the purpose of the line, "The Grinch hated Christmas, the whole Christmas season. Now please don't ask why, no one quite knows the reason." And the new Cindy Lou, while cute, lacks the innocence of the original.

The Grinch is wonderful, especially to those who have him etched in our earliest memories.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unbelievable.
15 December 2002
No really. It's unbelievable, as in, the comdey goes so far, you simply can't let your imagination stretch anymore. That wouldn't be so bad, but the problem is, it's just not that funny (Home Alone 2 had this problem, too.). In fact, the best stuff comes from Sinbad (This is a SICK world, full of SICK people; 911! 911!). Personally, I think Jake Lloydd should be banned from Hollywood (and he probably was after he ruined Episode one).

** out of **** stars, for Sinbad alone. PS, the special effects stunk.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed