Reviews

10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Brilliant, Beautiful, Human and Gripping
9 October 2019
"The Current War: Director's Cut" is, in a word, gripping. Even though I am deeply familiar with the subject matter and the great inventors and industrialists involved in the tale of how the alternating current propounded by Nikola Tesla and George Westinghouse prevailed over the direct current system of Thomas Edison, I was held absolutely rapt and engaged from beginning to end of this "based on a true story" historical offering.

Leading a stellar cast is Benedict Cumberbatch as T.A. Edison, the Wizard of Menlo Park. Cumberbatch captures perfectly every overt thing we've heard about Edison's drive, his passion, his need for attention and his hatred of rivals and patent thieves. Despite having to play a man whose moods and volatility are legendary, he does a glorious job of infusing Edison with a sense of pathos and humanity not captured in any other film I've seen with Edison as a character.

His primary foil is George Westinghouse, just beginning to parlay his success with train air brakes into something much more grand, much more impactful. Played as a humanitarian who cares more for improving the world than for mere dollars by Michael Shannon, his calm and measured demeanor beautifully offsets the more edgy and vain Edison.

Show throughout is the love that both men have for their wives, who are played as much as partners as spouses (as evidence, when Mrs. Westinghouse is introduced early on, the accompanying identifying text describes her as "wife and partner"). The film clearly invites us to see everyone as human beings first, and icons of technology, invention and entrepreneurialism second. Historical efforts are often rather dry and factual, and it is refreshing to see an effort made to humanize those involved. When the unthinkable happens to Mrs. Edison, Thomas' grief is inconsolable, his melancholy palpable and enduring.

As the competition to be *the* electrical standard that will serve the world, Nikola Tesla (Nicholas Hoult) enters the scene, and IMHO, he is not actually given as much attention as he deserves in all of this (he essentially made practical the theoretical and unfulfilled promise of alternating current). The fact that Edison was involved in trying to supply power to the world for lighting is basically forgotten by us at this point in history, so superior was AC and Tesla's invention of the AC motor.

The competition comes to a head when Edison and Westinghouse offer their bids to see who will illuminate the Columbian Exposition of 1893 in Chicago...The White City, as it would come to be known. Will the World's Fair committee choose Edison's less efficient system with its inherent inefficiencies, but with built in name recognition and draw potential, or Westinghouse/Tesla's cheaper and infinitely more expandable and functional AC system? Of course we know how that works out, because we live in that future now.

A simple drama would end with Edison walking away to lick his wounds and disappear into obscurity, but he was in fact brilliant and unparalleled as a brute force creator, and so the film ends with us being firmly reminded that Edison created the first practical motion picture technology, and so the film winds up neatly, properly, and respectfully on all counts.

I would be terribly remiss if I didn't mention the incredible soundtrack music that moves through this film. My viewing partner said that "it was like another character", and that is spot on. Heavily oriented in bass synth notes with sparse yet perfect strings above, the insinuation of the music is always at the exact right time, always with the exact right amount of both intensity and reserve. Major kudos to composers Volker Bertelmann and Dustin O'Halloran. I will be seeking out their other work together. The CGI is absolutely seamless and perfect, the sets, costuming, and period appropriate lighting spot on. A beautiful film visually, auditorially and emotionally. On one final note, those who enjoy popular mainstream action and superhero films will be pleasantly surprised to see Tom Holland in a substantial supporting role.

A solid 9 out of 10 for me. YMMV.
43 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Um...Amazing. How About *Amazing*?
5 September 2016
I am so old that I watched TOS from it's first episode. I have seen every Trek film in the theater when it was released. I attended a Trekkie event in the early 80's at Kemper Arena when Roddenberry was still the main attraction, and he was showing the original version of the Star Trek pilot, which was the *only* way one got to see it back in those days. It was the central feature of the three hour evening event, along with blooper reels and his wonderful tales of the olden days. I say all this so that I can say *this*, and hope that it is taken with at least a small amount of gravitas: I think that "Beyond" is the best film of the venerable series. If you leave aside the arguments about which cast you prefer, what epoch, things like TNG vs original vs Abrams reboot canon...yes...the best single film of the series. Is it bombastic? Yes,very...but the bombast is deftly woven, with each set piece, each intensely flowing scene or battle making sense in the whole - rare for a Sci-Fi film these days, where the emphasis is always on the gee whiz of special effects and CGI, to the detriment of the story or the characters. The 3D CGI is the best I've seen since "Avatar". The sound production is possibly the best *ever* (keeping in mind that seeing films in IMAX is a whole other bar for media rendered in lesser formats). Topped off with the fact that I cannot imagine a better set of players to represent our venerated TOS crew members - these actors don't so much portray TOS characters as *channel* them at times - the reasons to see "Beyond" are many. So deft and respectful and loving are the hands that guide this "new" iteration (the first reboot film, "Star Trek", was made seven years ago), that nods to the original cast, which could easily be hamhanded and just plain irritating, land fuzzy and warm in your lap, bringing a near certainty of tears being shed by the viewer. However, the single most impressive thing as in this entire film, as regards giving nods to the original television series...from my POV...is a scene where Spock and McCoy are moving through an area where they are completely surrounded by rocks...and the outcroppings are *so* obviously a set, as opposed to the spectacularly rendered CGI everywhere else, and so garishly colored and sculpted, that it *must* have been a nod to the sometimes comical sets of TOS. The fact that there is more classic Spock vs McCoy banter in "Beyond" than in any of it's reboot predecessors only makes me more certain that this seemingly clumsily rendered scene was, in fact, a loving tribute. Folks...*no* detail in such a high stakes Hollywood film exists by accident, and this must have been by design.

In conclusion, if the future of our beloved Star Trek could be in better hands than those of JJ Abrams and his minions, I cannot imagine who that might have been.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining and Bloody
28 January 2013
In case you can't discern from the title, this is a *very* violent film, so don't be a putz and take your five or six year old kid, like a couple of people did at the Independence, Missouri AMC screening tonight. There are more triple-taps to the head than any film in recent memory, to the point that it becomes rather over the top by the time the film ends All that said, Walter Hill has woven yet another well-paced, engrossing buddy film actioner with a pretty good left hand twist. Stallone plays a weary New Orleans hit-man very convincingly, and with a very wry sense of humor. Were he any more droll, he would have to become a British citizen.

"Bullet" has everything an Action fan loves...really nasty bad guys, impossibly punishing fights, explosions, hot women, and main characters you can actually care something about. The plot isn't suspenseful, but it isn't meant to be, as our heroes go on what for one is a vendetta, and for the other a bumbling police investigation. Indeed, Sung Kang's Washington DC detective seems at times to have the insight of a rock, but Kang is pretty and plays well alongside the grizzled Stallone.

All and all, if you enjoy this sort of film, well...you'll enjoy "Bullet to the Head".
102 out of 138 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
You Didn't *Have* to be There, But You'll Wish You Were
3 June 2010
If you are cynical, or unable to see past your own little corner of this world, this film will seem to you to be a regional self-love fest - a trip down nostalgia lane for a bunch of middle aged Midwestern hippies. If you love history, rock and roll, and all things sociological, then "Cowtown Ballroom: Sweet Jesus!" will hold you in thrall.

The makers of this documentary did a wondrous job given the dearth of film from either the era or the location of the film's subject, a Kansas City music venue whose legacy is far larger than the old roller rink in which it was sited, and much longer than it's three year run would seem to indicate. The concerts held there in the early 1970's are still talked about today amongst those of us who attended. The sterile, metal-detected, put your butt in the seat and keep it there concerts of today are as different from Cowtown shows as baby formula and moonshine, and CB:SJ! does an excellent job of taking us back to a simpler and often more fulfilling time in the music world. Moreover, the film gives us a brief, but earnest glimpse into the social trends and cultural environment that spawned Cowtown and many other venues like it across the country.

"Cowtown Ballroom: Sweet Jesus!" is for anyone who ever sat on the floor with their best girl, twisted up a fatty, and let the music flow over them with a thousand other long hairs like them. It is also for them to show their children that, yes, indeed, Mom and Dad were once cool.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Possibly the Single Most Important Film Ever
14 August 2009
This film, more than any other single factor, affected my way of thinking about Life, Religion, and everything. The message of Inherit the Wind is, if anything, even more relevant in the new millennium as the forces of legislated morality strive ever harder to write their particular mythology into the legal fabric of our country.

It is sad that these self-righteous, pious individuals fail to recognize that the only reason their own religions are allowed to exist is because of the very freedoms that allowed Bertram Cates to speak his mind in this superb rendering of a classic play. As Henry Drummond says when talking about suppression of speech and thought by one ideology toward another, "...if you can do one, then you can do the other." Truth is, and shall always be, in the eye of the beholder. You cannot and should not attempt to cram your Truth down the throat of another.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Vile, Insipid, Boring - A Travesty
22 June 2009
The worst thing about this "remake" is that they hung the name of *the* classic 50's sci-fi film on it. The new "Day" has virtually nothing in common with the original save for a few character names and the general notion of an alien coming to Earth to make us do something we were unwilling to do ourselves.

The film is so low key, it is hard to believe it was even written. Everyone sleepwalks through their parts, perhaps taking a cue from Reeves, who generates about as much excitement in this film as does the ingredient list on a box of Cream of Wheat. Virtually *nothing* happens in this movie. There is no sense of tension, no dramatic unfolding of plot. You couldn't possibly care less about any of the sketchily drawn characters - it is perhaps revealing that Gort, the now giant robot weapon system, has more personality than all the other characters in the film rolled together...and he doesn't speak. Even the numerous helicopters in the movie are CGI, and they *still* have more personality than Reeves.

This remake is a classic example of Hollywood, bereft of ideas, trying to profit on name recognition and fond memories. Even the "you're ruining the planet and killing yourselves" theme of the film is less threatening than a warm, purring kitten. I can't even work up the energy to be offended at how this bland, vapid remake lifted superficial details from the original, because it is so utterly unlike the earlier, vastly, vastly, VASTLY better original.

I paid one dollar to rent this film from a Redbox. I feel like I was robbed.

Truly one of the worst films ever made.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fire Birds (1990)
1/10
Worst Dialogue Ever Written for a Film
22 June 2006
Subject says it all. The worst movie ever made, seriously, zero redeeming qualities. Even the action scenes are boring. Stilted dialog, insipid plot, derivative storyline, laughable direction and acting.

This film is a landmark of bad film, something that should be enshrined in the Hall of Shame. Do not watch this film under any circumstances, including being held at gunpoint.

Rarely will you see talented people having their skills so poorly used, even when they obviously phoned in the part. Cage and Jones, usually actors of some quality, are total stereotypes and probably made the biggest mistakes of their acting careers by allowing this film to ever be released with their faces and names attached to it. Sean Young, however, performs up to expectations, as there are none for her.

Did I mention that this movie is incredibly, unbelievably *bad*?
18 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb Film
5 September 2005
Of all the fine work done by Sidney Poitier during his heyday, this film stands out as the most accessible, the most likable and the most heartwarming. Poitier's portrayal of itinerant builder Homer Smith rings true throughout, a man living life on his own terms...yet still a humane and involved individual.

This film has everything that brings good humor to a movie. The classic "fish out of water" premise, amicable cross-cultural confusion, joyous music...but it is much, much more than a mere comedy; much more than a simple drama.

This film was made in the thick of the civil rights movement. A black man in close juxtaposition to a group of white nuns was an eyebrow raiser in the 60's, as was the overall multicultural setting. White, black, Mexican, Anglo, German, Hispanic - all are tossed together with such a deft hand that the occasional nod to the prevailing racist attitudes of the time is almost brushed aside as the film skillfully makes its point. The emphasis here is on people doing as people should do...working and living together, helping one another and learning and growing from the experience.

Perhaps this is the time for any of us who has seen this film to see it again, and ask ourselves how the lessons of "Lilies of the Field" can be applied to the recovery from the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, and the relief of all the human misery that has resulted.
79 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blind Date (1987)
8/10
Blake Edwards' Genius Makes This a Classic
7 February 2004
I've read with interest a number of user comments on this film, and I've come to the conclusion that many people have no idea what true classic comedy entails. Blake Edwards is, without a doubt, the finest comic director of the past fifty years, and this film is a prime example of why. The casting is flawless, the material is deeply funny, but it is the *details* that make this film the incredibly uproarious vehicle that it is. Edwards' forte is comic surprise; the little things that come completely out of left field, the sotto voce comments made (the judge telling the butler, "oh, and kill the dog"...then, some moments later, in the background, a gunshot rings out, Basinger miming the drunk test which Willis is easily passing, falling down in the background while trying to stand on one foot).

If you haven't really *watched* this film, then do so...and learn to cherish one of filmdom's greatest talents, Blake Edwards.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gee...I liked it.
6 September 2003
Hmm...I thought it was quite funny, actually. Sandler was playing the straight man, for those of you who didn't notice, so perhaps that was a bit unsettling and disorienting?

Nicholson had a tour de force. It wasn't a *great* comedy, but it certainly was a good one.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed