Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Poor finish to an interesting slow burner.
9 August 2012
Beneath The Dark starts well enough. A young couple pull up into a hotel, looking for a place to stay for the night. As in so many hotel horrors that went before it, the place is deserted and what little people that are around are incredibly sinister. Sound familiar? That's because it is. Imagine Reeker, Vacancy and The Shining (try spot the references) thrown into a blender. That's the impression Beneath The Dark makes early on, and it's a good 'un.

Slowly the movie unfolds a series of flashbacks which give an insight into the past of a few of the characters we have seen throughout the movie and into the secrets that their past holds.

Paul and Adrienne are a run of the mill young couple experiencing a few relationship problems (Vacancy anyone?) and Frank is the lonely hotel owner who is sinister in his overt friendliness. All sounding pretty run of the mill so far? Here's where it veers off.

Through the pre-mentioned flashbacks, and also the bizarre reveals we begin to realise there's a lot more going on in Paul's life than meets the eye, and from some reason, the events of the night seem to be unfolding around the mysterious secrets of his past. As the intensity of these bizarre incidents is cranked up the viewer begins to feel increasingly unsettled and also engrossed. The slow burning build-up beats every last inch of possible tension out of what is, in all fairness, a very lame script. Slowly Beneath The Dark appears to be building to something magnificent, and then boom, the end has happened. Where was our sensational denouement? Nowhere to be seen. In a finish that's likely to leave more questions than answers, and not in the good David Lynchian way, the viewer is left feeling somewhat ripped off.

You put up with the bad acting and poor dialogue for what appears to be an interesting plot and quite decent direction to be left feeling somewhat dumbfounded as to how the writer felt that to be an acceptable finish to the movie. Beneath The Dark as a result, appears to be a case of a writer biting off more than he can chew, but with some very blatant signs of potential for the future. All in all I give it 6/10.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In Her Skin (2009)
5/10
Promising film, undermined by poorly executed gimmicks.
3 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Based on the true story of the disappearance and murder of Rachel Barber, a 15 year old, ballet loving girl in Australia. I Am You is split into three parts. Initially we follow the parents (played convincingly by Miranda Otto and Guy Pearce) as they seek assistance in the hunt for their daughter. The police seem to have little care for their story and give little assistance to the parents in locating their daughter. The second follows the killer, a dumpy 20 year old former neighbour who is envious of Rachel's beauty and her loving family. played magnificently by Ruth Bradley this is undoubtedly the stand out segment of the film as we are taken inside the deranged mind of Caroline, who was actually sentenced to 20 years imprisonment and not declared insane when it came to sentencing. The third section follows Rachel up to the point of her murder. This section felt hurried and little effort seems to have been made to develop Rachel as a character, instead she is just shown as your typical, one-dimensional popular teen.

This gimmicky approach ultimately undermines the films as all three sections only take up around an hour through the films run time and feel as though they were ordered wrongly. The rest of the time is allocated to allowing the police to find out what we already know. Done well this could have enhanced the film, instead the viewer is left stumped as to why the Director chose to include this undoubtedly dull section. On top of this the director adds further gimmicks needlessly. Panning Steadicam shots and hushed whispers and breathing dubbed over the soundtrack, there to represent the spirit of Rachel watching over the events are ultimately a waste of time as they add little in the way of substance and serve only as lacklustre attempt at adding an artsy feel to the films. Ultimately these attempts leave the film feeling like a pretentious, true-crime story. Well worth a watch, but definitely not deserving of a second viewing.

5/10

Big props on the soundtrack full of John Butler tracks though. His little cameo was a nice touch too.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed