Change Your Image
j66616814k00
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againSee Also: King's Favourite Actresses - Modern Period
Next list: December 1st 2024
See Also: Favourite Actresses of... tomorrow? #1 Favourite Actresses of... tomorrow? #2
Films seen includes non-Hallmark features.
See Also: Hallmark Christmas 2019 - Top 10 Hallmark Christmas 2020 - Top 10 Hallmark Christmas 2021 - Top 10 Hallmark Christmas 2022 - Top 10 Hallmark Christmas 2023 - Top 10
10 of the best - Hallmark Christmas Movies
XMAS Megalist
Waiting for:
- Jocelyn Hudon
See Also: Halloween Megalist Halloween 2019 - Top 10 Halloween 2020 - Top 10 Halloween 2021 - Top 10 Halloween 2022 - Top 10 Halloween 2022 - Top 10 New Releases Halloween 2022 - Shudder
Halloween 2023 - Top 10 Halloween 2023 - Top 10 New Releases Halloween 2023 - Shudder
See Also: Favourite Actresses of the 1930s Favourite Actresses of the 1940s Favourite Actresses of the 1950s & 1960s Favourite Actresses of the 1970s & 1980s Favourite Actresses of the 1990s Favourite Actresses of the 2000s Favourite Actresses of the 2010s
Minimum 20 films.
Every film seen:
- Marilyn Monroe (31)
- Grace Kelly (11)
- James Dean (3)
- Alicia Vikander, Elizabeth Olsen, Edward Norton, Jennifer Aniston, Felicity Jones, Emma Watson, Kate Beckinsale, Florence Pugh, Bel Powley, Michelle Dockery, Margot Robbie, Denzel Washington
Recently Added:
- Wicked Little Letters (2023) - Timothy Spall (28)
- Beau Brummell (1954) - Elizabeth Taylor (42)
- Conspirator (1949) - Elizabeth Taylor (41)
- The Sandpiper (1965) - Elizabeth Taylor (40), Richard Burton (20), Charles Bronson (20)
- The V.I.P.s (1963) - Elizabeth Taylor (39), Maggie Smith (22), Orson Welles (22)
300th Actor Added:
- Alicia Vikander
- Jeremy Irons
- Stephen Graham
See Also: Most Watched Directors
Excluding westerns.
See Also: History: Before Time Began History: Antiquity in Film History: Age of Discovery in Film History: Contemporary Age History: World War II History: The Present Day
Listed in reverse chronological order, most recent first.
Estimated date at the film's start used.
See Also: King's Favourite Actresses - Classical Period
Reviews
Le divorce (2003)
Horrible Characters, Horrible Film
Roxeanne/Roxy (Naomi Watts) is an American in Paris. Pregnant, she is abandoned by her husband who decides he prefers his mistress, and the story unfolds as her family gets involved. Her sister Isabel (Kate Hudson) flies over to help her, the rest of her family hear about if from afar, and the husband's French side of the family try to deal with his mistakes and discuss how they can come out of the divorce on top, whilst avoiding the unspeakable subject of the affair.
The tag-line for Le Divorce is "A comedy of manners...both good and bad." Unfortunately, Le Divorce isn't a comedy. It's a problem riddled drama that mishandles the big issues, has little respect for its characters and is far, far too long. It kicks off with a perfectly OK beginning, introducing us to some unlikeable people saying unlikeable things. Roxeanne's parents care more for a painting than the happiness of one of their daughters - "our girls are thousands of miles away from and they should be home with us. That's the essentials," one of them says, before the conversation swiftly returns to an expensive painting she has in her Paris home. The Americans in Le Divorce equally appear to be commodities to be retrieved from the French - Watts's character seems abandoned by those who should care for her beyond using her as a pawn to gain the upper hand.
After finding out about his affair, Roxy rightly detests her husband, does not want to see him, even spend time in the same room as him, yet will not consider a divorce. It's almost as if the writer wants to continue to punish the character. She must be chastised for her American ideals in Paris, and indeed she does not get off lightly.
The sister, now in Paris consoling her sister, then sees the husband kissing another woman in a bar, and her reaction is to smile and then chat with him amiably whilst he rationalises his affair in a stereotypical French way - "she should understand. She is a poet." Meanwhile, Roxy is pregnant and alone. It's impossible to tell what message the film is trying to get across - that all French men follow their heart at the expense of duty and honour? That a charming accent justifies all actions. Perhaps. The actions of Isabel, however, are impossible to justify and the film doesn't even try.
First she decides to pursue the French uncle - why? A flirty line on liking "red meat," followed by a strange sideways transition in the editing and 3 minutes later she becomes his mistress, simultaneously continuing on a flirtatious courtship with a young Frenchman she slept with within a day or two of arrival. Meanwhile, as we know, Roxy is still pregnant and alone. The film is inherently shallow, glorying in its consumerism and appearances - opera, poetry recital, expensive paintings, designer handbags, lingerie, fine dining. The lack of confrontation is infuriating, revelations are merely glossed over, and nobody appears to say anything that an actual person would say dealing with these issues. The worst example of this is Roxy's failed suicide attempt, which is expertly glossed over. Isabel tells the family not to mention it, they don't, and Roxy, lying in a hospital bed with bandages on her wrist tells her husband that she blames herself for her decision making. Quick, move on, we have a great little scene with Stephen Fry as a Christie's buyer to get to! And off we go.
The change of pace and time is also difficult to follow or justify. Whilst at the start, the film seems to be taking one day at a time, it begins to jump several days, perhaps weeks, between scenes without any visuals clues that we've moved forward. Occasionally an increasingly more pregnant Roxy is shown side on so we're aware of some time passing, but generally it's a mess. Things occasionally pick up with the few scenes afforded to Matthew Modine's character. He's the husband of the mistress of the husband of Roxeanne, who seems unstable enough to spark some life into the entire film. Sadly, as in the scene in the bookshop, he is quickly ushered out of the frame again, only to return for an improbably contrived finale with a gun on the Eiffel Tower.
Yes, the weird ending - from drama to Hitchcockian suspense to a whimsical voice-over conclusion as the handbag, containing the gun, floats on the wind over Paris. It all feels a bit Sex and the City hearing Kate Hudson sum everything up into a neat little package. A horrible, superficial, meaningless package. And I hated it.