Reviews

20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Straight Outta Time
17 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
All in all, this was a pretty good movie if you can think of it like a high budget VHI biopic. It serves the music very well, and hits most of the high points in the lives and careers of the NWA alumnus. Be forewarned however, quite a bit of artistic license is taken as to how various events developed. So if you are like most people that will be paying to see this in theaters - people that already know all of the beats (pun intended), expect to roll your eyes a couple times.

Regardless, the film does an excellent job of displaying the feel and look of the various periods. For the most part, the movie keeps one riveted throughout. Most acting is quite good, and the fact that the producers didn't feel a need to use older, well known actors (as usually the case with rap oriented movies) goes along way toward keeping you "in the movie" as you watch. The standout acting performance is Giamatti. If in any other movie, he would probably be Oscar nominated.

Straight Outta Compton does have the same problem as the recent Entourage movie...trying to cram too much into two hours. This means there are giant leaps through time that would likely be hard to follow for non-fans. If you haven't watched every Behind the Music doc covering all of these people, you will likely be lost. To compound this, the time period after the NWA album up the end (Dre announcing he's leaving Death Row) is jammed into the last quarter of the movie...and only a few high points are hit. For example, the release of the Chronic was barely even mentioned...and you only see Snoop very briefly. Once again, had I not known the back story, I would have had no idea what was going on at times.

It almost feels as if the movie was written initially to end as soon as the group became commercially successful, and then it was decided to tack another 10 years of history on. For what it's worth, the name of the movie is Straight Outta Compton, so had the movie ended at the point that album was successful, it would have been much better. What you have here is a movie that would have been better off as an HBO mini series with room to breathe...or at least it could have been served up in two parts (sequel). After seeing the movie, I have to wonder if one of these things were not the original intention, and the studio's insecurity about it's potential popularity caused it to be truncated and released as a end of summer flick.

What I'm getting at is that you are probably not going to walk away from this film totally satisfied, but there are some really strong scenes, great use of the music, and solid performances. It's clearly worth seeing at a theater if you are a fan, for what that's worth. Unlike the aforementioned Entourage movie, this one will not tarnish the legacy. What it will do however is make you dig out those old CD's.
5 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Men of a Certain Age (2009–2011)
9/10
I wish it would come back
31 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is the first show of this sort I've seen in many years from a regular network that was this well put together. Sure, it's not perfect, but it is serious, yet funny at times, and gives the occasional wink to the viewers. Best of all, you really grow to like the characters. Romano is perfect in his role, as is virtually everyone else in the cast. Multiple story lines run parallel, and then intersect at the end...love it.

Are there any real problems with the show? Well, it can be a little heavy handed at times...in Modern Family fashion, some episodes transition to "totally sappy" right at the end. And often the writers beat the "middle-age thing" in the ground...in the same fashion that The 80's Show did with period pop culture, to their dismay. And the major problem with the show was the casting of Bakula. The first episode I caught had these guys speaking of their *upcoming* 50th birthday. I was like WHAT?

I ran straight to the computer to check Bakula's age. Yes, I was right...he would have been around 56 or so when filming. Sure, that isn't that big of a stretch for Hollywood, but let's face it, he's old looking even for someone pushing 60...despite the "youthful energy" that has been written into his role or how "hip" they make his blond-dyed hair. In the past, the rule when casting someone older than their part is that they must look young for their age...not the opposite. OK, I admit there was Luke Perry (90210) as well as Tom Welling (Smallville)...both high school freshman in the first season, yet both in their mid 20's and showing every year.

Either way, Bakula in this role will bother you for at least a half dozen episodes before you can block it out. But eventually, the show is so good that it makes you use your imagination...in the way that people did back in Greek days when men played woman's parts. Suggestion: Start looking at like he is the older friend that happened to start college at, say 26 when the others were 18, and it will all make sense, as long as you ignore the many age-milestone cues that come at you like machine gun fire.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Car Show (2011– )
9/10
A car show that appeals to the regular guy.
13 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
After viewing the pilot, I feel this is a very pleasant "car guy" type of show. I can only hope following episodes continue to evolve as the show continues. To get the elephant in the room out of the way first, no, this is not a show that will put Top Gear USA out of business, nor was it meant to be. Sure, it is true that Adam Carolla was the lead host on the original big budget NBC version of Top Gear, and would have remained in that roll on the History Channel's version, had there not been scheduling conflicts with his CBS pilot. But this was never a show, by any means meant to make up for that. That said, this is basically a low to mid budget car oriented show that is a little bumpy at times, but feels like it knows exactly what it is, rather than trying to reach for the stars.

One thing Carolla fans will notice right off the bat is Adam doing what he does so well (cracking wise). This is likely a good strategy since he has the #1 podcast in the world, not to mention a spin-off called CarCast...which is unsurprisingly not that different from this show. Along the same lines, the co-hosts have all been interviewed on his various shows in the past, Salley in particular having his own show on Adam's network for a while. So this is a proved formula, at least when speaking of his fan base.

One may notice the topic discussion format somewhat resembling The Metal Show, which is interesting considering their all too similar deadpan titles. Sports fans may also feel the four hosts are discussing topics in an almost ESPN-like fashion. Naturally, there is an obligatory exotic car test is done in the vein of UK Top Gear. But this time, you have Adam, once again, cracking wise to lighten up the uber-seriousness that is set up in the intro. This works quite well, making the segment feel as if it is actually a Top Gear parity rather than an actual test drive. This little "wink" lets the viewer know the show isn't taking itself too seriously. By the way, "24 Hours of Lemons", which has also been discussed previously on CarCast, is pure genius in concept.

In closing, I feel the show is perfect for what it is...a simple car show on a relatively obscure network. If you are a serious car guy, and particularly if you are interested in modern automobiles, you will be happy with what they have brought. Along the same lines, if you are one of the millions of die hard Carolla fans, you will want to tune in just to hear the comedic rantings of a this genius/madman. If you are both a car guy and a fan, you will be in Nirvana. But if neither of these apply to you, stick with Top Gear. In other words, for a select audience, this may be just the show you have been waiting for. Episode two should tell the tale.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Maybe most don't get this one?
3 June 2009
This movie is a perfect example of guilty pleasure. Sure, it is not well written (or is it?). It isn't well acted (or was it?). My point, this movie was a literal "winkathon". In other words, it was meant to be corny, goofy, silly, and down right fun to watch. That being said, go back and watch it again and you will see my point. Where did a (current) 4.X rating come from? All I can figure that is comes from votes from clueless suburbans, or maybe teens that don't realize how iconic this movie is, or how this movie was one of the last blasts of the drive-in culture of America. Sure, it's not Citizen Kane...but should merit an easy 6 on cast names alone.

That said, what really makes this movie great is the talent in it! It may be the best collection of screen legends and icon ever assembled. The point in time when this movie was made allowed this phenomenon to be possible. In 1984, most of these actors were slightly past their peak, but still in the acting game...so this may explain the ability to cast all of them (without a billion dollar budget). Try to replicate this today with an equivalent assortment of actors, and it would not be possible.

What makes this A-list super-fest even more golden is the fact that nearly every major player in this picture is now gone, or well up in years. Think of this movie as a video history of screen legends, or even a vague record of the car culture of the 70's and the phenomenon the actual Brock Yates cross country races were.

But if you are too young to know who these actors are, know nothing about the real Cannonball races, and don't appreciate drive-in type cinema/comedy, skip this one (rather than give it an unfair vote). Do that for me, and I won't give movies like Twilight or Lord of the Rings a 2.
23 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jesus Camp (2006)
8/10
More Cringe Worthy Moments Per Minute
20 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Wow, what a painful thing to watch. I had to watch the film in four isolated sittings to finish it, and two friends only made it to the first "break", and would not resume it at any point.

But this is actually a complement to the documentary. In other words, the film makers were able to convey, well, the reality of these people, this camp, etc. The most amazing thing is that they pretty much just filmed what they saw, and let the material speak for itself...creating more cringe worthy moments per minute than anything in recent memory.

Additionally, the fact that they pretty much left the footage alone, other than maybe a little timely background music and editing surely was the reason these people in the film allowed them to make this in the first place. But I have to wonder if they (campers) realized at any point what the point of this doc was...or did they think they were being painted in a good light? Or was this a well scripted practical joke using actors, along the lines of Blair Witch? If so, it fooled me...but that would make more sense that this being a voluntary documentary.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superbad (2007)
10/10
What a surprise!
24 November 2007
Wow, I never saw that coming! I had seen a few previews of the movie and thought it would be OK. Also, since it has "George-Michael" in it from Arrested Development, I assumed it might be worth watching for that alone (the reason most people saw Licensed to Wed - for the Office cast members). When browsing the local movie choices at a dollar theater, it was one of the choices, so I looked at an online review source and noticed it had many good reviews. Now I was intrigued. Also, I noticed this was directed by the Coen Brothers. Maybe this movie is a sure thing? Upon seeing it, I was totally stunned. This may be one of the top 5 teen movies of all times! Sure, it still has a few tired premises, but does it so well that you don't notice so much. The best part is that this movie is SO funny. It packs more laughs per minute than anything I can think of. The only weird thing about this movie is that I have not heard more about it. Had this film been promoted a little more, it would surely be the Porkys of this decade, no question. Had this been an 80's movie, it would have been right up there with the best from Hughes! This is highly recommended, well, unless you are a stodgy old person.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Could have been so much better!
12 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I went in to this movie a little skeptical, as it seems Samuel Jackson only does movies with "Snake" in the title lately! Anyway. I often read reviews for movies where they say a movie is "uneven". I often watched the movies later and thought that they weren't quite that bad. This movie however, is the true definition of uneven. At times, this movie is top notch, and with other parts I was thinking WTF? The sentimental parts were handled well, and the basic premise was interesting.

The biggest problem with this movie is the "fake south" setting however, which totally pulls the viewer right out of the storyline. I wondered as I watched if this movie is set in the 40's, the 70's or what? About half way through the movie I was more confused / surprised to learn that this was supposed to be set in modern times??? One person made a reference to a relative getting leather boots from "the computer".

* Sure, there is some place (supposedely in MS in this movie) where people from the South have only vaguely heard of the internet (or computer, lol) and people 17-25 all meet in a field and dance to southern rockish/countryish music and everyone drives 30 year old cars from the 70's that run fine (where do they find parts?). All the while, everyone looks and acts like they just came from "My Name is Earl", and dream of moving to Knoxville, which by the way is several hundred miles from MS, so obviously was used for familiarity purposes? We must not forget that black people are stereotyped as being stuck in the 40's too, WTF? This is about as real as the 80's stereotype of gang members dressing in gay S/M studded leather and talking trash while having knife fights. Sure.

I remember a while back Ebert (of Ebert and Roper) made a declaration of how fake and irritating the "fake south thing" in modern movies is when reviewing Sweet Home Alabama. It was OK back in the 70's with "Deliverance" (set in GA) and in the 60's w. "Beverly Hillbillies" (supposedly from Oklahoma), but today it is silly, fake, etc.

For those of you that have never been outside of your own area, don't believe such silliness in movies. Even in the south, virtually every kid over the age of 8 has a My Space page, is listed on Facebook, and radio stations play the same top 40 / rap, etc, and any town of size has a mall with virtually the same clothes. You would be hard pressed to tell any differences city for city size for size, to anywhere other than the weather.

Anyway, the movie is all over the place. If nothing else, Justin Timberlake is surprisingly good. "It is so rare for a musician to become a good actor", I read all over. BUT WAIT! He was an actor before he was a singer...I guess everyone forgot that, conveniently. Whatta mess. If anything, I was surprised as to this movie's voter rating. You can find plenty of enduring Oscar winning flicks with lower ratings. Maybe this movie was made for the simple purpose of selling tickets. If so, that would make more sense. Otherwise, the lack of reality ruins any chance this movie could ever have a shelf life.

I just don't get it...or maybe it is everyone else that doesn't get it. Yee-haw. Lets go rustle up some boots on that-there computer thing my 4th cousin/ ex-wife heard about. Sure. Worthy of 10 stars?
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Commando (1985)
4/10
Finally saw it after all of these years
5 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Finally saw it after all of these years. This movie started off pretty cool, but got plain silly about half way through. Before all of the parities like Hot Shots, etc. this movie would not have been so absurd, but it had ever cliché in the book, and made you think of them. Also, the one liners were everywhere and well spaced. Lots of decent action, decent car chases, but the end fight where Arnold is mowing down people was insane. Rae Dawn Chung going along with everything was not believable, and of course she happened to know how to fly a plane? We must not forget that they had to have an excuse to show Arnolds muscles, so on those lines, they didn't use the ripped shirt technique as they usually do with Bruce and Stallone movies, but figured out ways to pull his shirt off altogether. The rowing boat scene had me laughing. Could they have not done that whole scene in a less corny way? Every time Arnold was shot or whatever, he was fine 30 seconds later. One interesting note was that Alyssa Milano was like 15 in this movie but made up to be 12. Guess it would not have worked otherwise. I could pick this movie apart, scene by scene...but I will stop. Is this movie worth watching? Well, if you are drinking, hanging out with friends, etc, maybe. Otherwise you will be rolling your eyes often.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretty Painful
3 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
If I had never seen the first Road House, then I guess this movie might get one more star, but even then that makes it a 3 star movie. For that matter I was really surprised as to the relatively high rating it currently has.

In reality, I was not able to finish this movie, as it was painful. Where it went wrong (at least the most obvious way) is that it pretty much parallels the original exactly even though the original plot is still referenced. This doesn't really make sense and doesn't work. Also, the acting is weak...I never felt like I was into the movie yet I felt like I was watching people act. Even good actors like Busey don't work out, probably due to the screenplay or maybe the awkward editing. The strangest thing is that the movie feels like a mid 90's B movie, yet is made in 06. I am not sure as to why, but then again, this often seems to happen with sequels for some reason. The music, the look, and the whole overall feel reminds me of movies you saw 10 years ago on Cinemax late at night. The strangest thing of all is that I am also expecting Ja Rule to come in at some point...often it reminds me of more current movies with rappers as actors.

The most irritating thing is love interest girl who's character seems like a total rip off of the Lois Lane character on Smallville which is also quite annoying. And lets not forget the fakest sounding "southern accents" I have heard since Walk the Line. I realize this is common place in movies, but no accent at all would work better than attempting to sound like you are from that universal hick place on TV where anyone from any southern state (or KY and WV) sound exactly the same. Sure, people in desert towns in AZ sound just like people in Southeastern states 2000+ miles away. That was wearing thin 10 years ago in the B movies where technique came from. Why do writers / directors make such decisions?

Bottom line: I would truly not recommend this if you are a fan of Road House or if you like good movies. Also, if you have not seen it yet, don't spoil it by seeing this version first. The original Road House was one of those accidental classics that people love and watch over and over. It was an unexpected success like American Graffiti, Dazed and Confused, and more recently Office Space, Fast and Furious (only the first one!), and Napolean Dynamite. Why did they spoil it!!!???

They should have never made a sequel to Road House other than a high budget version with the right actors / director. Sure, you can never top the original (ex: Bad News Bears, The Longest Yard, etc.), but at least if you can do it right it will be presentable as is the case with the examples I mentioned. But to make a low budget, off-network, self production of Road House is criminal.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
worth watching
1 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, this does feel like a formula 80's teen movie - as if the screenplay was shelved in 1984 and put together recently with only slight adaption. Some may criticize this, but other will revel in it. The whole time while watching the movie, I got Risky Business flashbacks. Even some of the scenes and music had that feel to it, but with a comedic feel almost...as if it was done intentionally. Naturally the movie has the stereotypes played to a T - the nerd pack, jocks, etc, but the bad guy (porn producer) was an interesting character, although this character while surely remind you of the pimp in Risky Business, no doubt...hmmm. Regardless, it is entertaining, and worth watching. Sure, it isn't a John Hughes movie, but one of the better teen movies I have seen the past couple years - or at least since 10 Things I Hate About You. The bottom line - if you are a sucker for "another teen movie" as I typically am, then I recommend this one.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Class (2006–2007)
7/10
Decent show
25 October 2006
This is a decent show that I would predict has a couple good seasons in it, but it doesn't really break any new ground. This may not be necessary for this show's survival, because the comedies to do so don't seem to translate to well to the general public. The show does seem to be a good medium between bathroom humor and complex comedy. Unfortunately however, I really cannot see the premise holding up much longer. After initially viewing the pilot I could not even imagine where they could take it next without leaving the premise behind (and I was right).

5 or even 10 years ago this show could have been a top show, but due to the recent batch of wickedly funny yet smart shows (Arrested Development, Boston Legal, The Office, etc.), this is only decent by comparison. The initial plot was interesting, but after the pilot, the show began to sneak away from the premise making for a pretty standard sit com in the vein of Friends, for example. But who am I to say a consistent yet mundane sit com is a bad thing...some people swear Seinfeld is the best show ever...WHAAA?

Many people judge a show by the pilot, and this show had a top notch one at that. It was fun, yet had a meaningful subtext, which some may notice is a writing technique employed by a few other shows currently. This will go over many people's heads, but for those that get it, it works - big time.

Once again, I figure this show might squeeze by for a couple seasons or so, mainly due to it's prime location sandwiched between the Monday lineup of solid shows, namely Two and a Half Men. However, were this a Fox show, it would already be gone - but then again, those idiots canceled Arrested Development, Titus, Malcolm, and Fastlane just to mention a few quantity over quality decisions.
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Miami Vice (2006)
7/10
Good action flick, not the original
28 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Had I never seen the original show, this would have simply been another decent cop / action movie. Since I have basically seen every episode a million times, I was a little let down.

As far as action and imagery goes, it was top notch, but the characterization of the original just was not there. At least the "Michael Mann feel" is there as well as excellent use of music, but even Heat seems a notch above this flick - and expectations were so high.

The screenplay is a little "messy" at times and it takes about 15 minutes into the film to feel comfortable that you were watching characters and not simply Ferrel and Fox. Also, the abundant use of acronyms and insider terms is surely more realistic, but probably will leave anyone who is not a DEA agent confused throughout the movie.

The biggest letdown of the film was the absence of Castillo (J.E. Olmos) who supposedly turned a reprising role. This would have made a huge improvement in the film and would have been the next best thing to having a 35 year old Don Johnson for the remake.

Don't get me wrong - this is a good movie, but is not up to par with what one expects from the people that made Miami Vice in the first place, and had 20 years and a zillion dollars to work with.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Surreal Life (2003– )
addictive
20 September 2004
I never quite got into the first season, but the second one had a combination of cast members that could possibly never be topped. In reality, if any one of the following were not on the show: Ice, Erik, Jeremy or Tammy, then it just wouldn't have been the same. I would like to see an "all-star" version of this show using the better cast mates from each season without the two or three "filler" celebrities that they feel they must ad to each season...you know...the ones that were mediocre, even in their prime, or are simply reality "stars". After viewing reruns on VH1, I have gained new respect for the first season however, and the third one is getting pretty interesting...in a train wreck sort of way. I just think that Jordan and the sour "too good for everyone" girl (cannot remember her name) both are putting a hurt on their future careers by doing this show...neither came off very well.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One Tree Hill (2003–2012)
7/10
Surprisingly Good!
25 February 2004
Normally, I just scoff at shows of this nature, but I happened to watch the pilot episode while working on a project because the TV was already on the WB channel from the previous show. Next thing you know I was wrapped up in this show, which seems to be the best of the genre. For once, this is one that doesn't borrow from 90210 or My So Called Life, yet seems to make its own direction. Sure, it is still has the cliches...28 year old, socially evolved high school students with attractive 32 year old parents, but once you get over this, the show really shines! I hope it has a future, although I doubt it will last very long since the OC is getting all of the buzz simultaneously.
75 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fastlane (2002–2003)
8/10
GREAT SHOW
25 January 2004
Wow, I never could figure out why this show disappeared. Everyone I spoke to liked it. This goes down in the unexplained cancellations file like My So Called Life and Family Guy for example. It was a little over the top, but was still a great show.

The thing that made it magic are all of the different elements of it. It had a continuing story line, which gave it backbone similar to another great show, Nash Bridges. It had the action of any Bruckheimer flick. It even had a great complementing pair of leading actors reminiscent of Miami Vice. Seems like a lot for a weekly show. Maybe it was too much for the general public. I do agree however that had this show been on a different night, it would have had a guaranteed hold for several seasons, and would have likely launched Facinelli into the ranks of Kutcher and other current young actors. Speaking of Facinelli, I would sure like to see him take over the Fast / Furious saga. Paul Walker should hopefully be ready to walk away from it anyway, especially after the mess that the sequel was.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ultimate Cheese-I Love the 80's!
25 January 2004
Wow, what an impression this movie and other movies like this made on me as a kid. I had thought, "Wow, I can't wait to go to college!" Upon a more recent viewing of this film, it had lost its luster. There are some great moments, for example the arrival to Palm Springs in traffic, which is pretty much dead on accurate, at least compared to Myrtle Beach spring break, even to this day. Unfortunately after that, very little could be considered realistic. The biggest issues I have with this movie are the 35 year old college frat guys, particularly the rich guys who were nothing but a 80's "Biff" device that are not believable in the slightest. These guys not only look 35, they act and dress as if they were 45, even while on spring break?

Also, the fun of the movie turns purely mediocre once the whole tired "bet" sequence begins (haven't we seen this before verbatim?).

Luckily, the ending turns out pretty solid however. One note to mention, the "nerd getting his day", another overused 80's device, is actually done better than average in this movie. One "neat factor" in this movie is seeing Tim Robbins in a role that most people would never believe he was in, but keep in mind that this was before his breakout success in Bull Duram. Heck, if someone offers me a role in a B level spring break movie, I wouldn't turn it down either! The only problem is that I am not 35 yet, and these days you have to be near 30 just to play a high schooler on TV shows (like Smallville) so maybe when I am 40? Overall, this is a fun movie that is best watched with a few beers and some friends, but don't even try to watch this one dead sober!!!
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shag (1988)
interesting
1 August 2003
My motivation for watching this movie was that it was actually filmed in Myrtle Beach. Growing up going to Myrtle in the summer, and of course going for the virtual spring break that goes on there all summer long for people of college age made me curious enough to view this film. After viewing it, I realized that it is true...there are a select few buildings that haven't changed since the 60's, and this movie used them well as props (in 89').

Unfortunately now that Myrtle Beach is the country's largest and fastest growing tourist area, most of the nostalgic buildings are going, but as of this summer, there are still a few drive ins and shops in original 50's condition, as well as the original Theme Park with the wooden roller coaster still standing (and in use). As a matter of fact, I have stayed twice at the Sea Palms motel in the "shag room" as it is called. The reason they call it this is because the movie actually used it to film a couple scenes (not for the reason you are thinking). Yes, it still looks like the 50's in this motel too...probably because that was the last time it was remodeled (unfortunately I am not joking). Either way, if you like Shag, and actually want to see all of the places on the strip where the scenes were shot, go to Myrtle on your next vacation (since you will likely be going there anyway). Note, you still won't get any sleep if you stay at a motel on Ocean Blvd (the strip)...that much hasn't changed since the 50's!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not as expected.
26 June 2003
The first movie seems so much better after viewing this. I had naturally expected much better than the first, but this was a letdown. The plot seems almost identical to Fastlane, and the movie felt flat. Yes it had great action, but it was unrealisic to an extent that the first movie would never have had the nerve to attempt. The final car "jump" was so corny and impossible that everyone in the theatre was growling in disgust. I gave it a 4 just because it still hit in a few ways, otherwise it would have been a 2. Using Miami as the backdrop was a great idea, but what happened to it? I would have not even known that this was set in Miami if they didn't refer to it intentionally several times. Miami Vice made a series out of imagery...while this movie stayed indoors as much as possible? I am so unhappy about viewing this movie, because I am sure there now will never be a proper sequel to the first, because the marketability of Paul Walker will likely lure him away from another version, as it lured Vin Diesel away from this sequel. The original movie had a mood to it, that would pull you in, and this one never even got started. I would have thought with the budget and hype, that the sequel could have been better, but I guess I was wrong?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very durable
26 June 2003
Any time this movie is on, I get sucked in. This movie is easily the most durable of any that I can think of. The only close competition for durability would be the Shawshank Redemption. This is one of those movies that I would see at the theater again, if they were to show it on the big screen! I would recommend this for kids too, because it is timeless. Or wait, it isn't timeless, it is full of time.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sabrina (1954)
10/10
I was surprised!
26 June 2003
Wow, this movie was smart! The dialogue could have almost been used verbatim in a 2003 remake. Actually, I have noticed that Harrison Ford was in a mid 90's remake, but I have yet to subject myself to it. Harrison is a good enough actor, but always gets put in the wrong roles. He is probably 60, looks 70, yet gets cast as 40...very irritating. Anyway, Sabrina is easily one of the best comedy / romance movies of all times. I checked this site, and totally couldn't believe the year it was made. If it had been in color, and didn't have well known actors that were relatively easy to gauge their age, then I would have easily guessed it 20+ years newer. If you don't get the movie, and / or you attempt to take it literally, it may seem somewhat weak, but for those of us that pick up on the intent, this is a winner, and possibly one of first to use such techniques.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed