Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Omar (2024)
1/10
"Omar": A Catastrophic Failure of Direction and Writing
22 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
"Omar" opens with a promise. A powerful man's son is murdered, thrusting Omar (Shariful Raj) and Bodi (Nasir Uddin Khan) into a desperate situation. Unfortunately, the initial tension of hiding the body fizzles out rapidly. The script, penned by Mostafa Kamal Raz and Siddiq Ahmed, fails to establish a sense of urgency or real danger. This lack of suspense plagues the film throughout.

A glaring example is the mid-point kidnapping. Three men snatch a powerful political figure from nowhere with nary a struggle. This scene lacks credibility and reduces a potentially gripping plot point to a cheap action sequence.

Furthermore, the film relies heavily on exposition. Omar and Bodi spend an excessive amount of time verbally recounting their actions, a crutch that undermines the power of visual storytelling. A skilled director would weave this information into the narrative, trusting the audience to pick up on the details.

Shahiduzzaman Selim's portrayal of the supposedly formidable Boro Mirza falls flat. The character lacks the gravitas and ruthlessness expected of such a powerful figure. This casting and directing choice weakens the narrative's core conflict.

Even the police interrogation scene, a potential turning point, descends into amateurism. The scene lacks the tension and nuance expected from a crucial moment in the film.

The ending is a desperate attempt to salvage the narrative. Omar's last-minute claim of masterminding the entire plot feels unearned and reeks of a contrived attempt to generate a twist.

"Omar" aspires to be a suspenseful thriller, but the weak script, coupled with questionable directing choices, undermines any potential tension. The film's reliance on exposition, unbelievable plot developments, and underwhelming performances leaves the audience frustrated rather than engaged.

Raz's direction is as misguided as it is uninspired. Scenes intended to convey tension fall flat due to his inability to grasp the fundamentals of visual storytelling. Instead of allowing the actions of the characters to speak for themselves, Raz opts for clumsy exposition and painfully forced dialogue, leaving audiences cringing in disbelief.

In the annals of cinema, "Omar" will be remembered not for its thrills or suspense but for its utter lack of merit.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Again amazing story telling, a must see Tarantino movie.
5 January 2016
The first one hour of the movie is character building and plot developing. Later, one hour and forty seven minutes will blow your mind. I think most of the haters seen first one hour of the movie, but if you want to enjoy a Tarantino movie properly, you must have to finish it up. He is not your conventional story teller.

All movie lovers ignore the haters and go for it please. It is one of the best Tarantino film. To me, the movie is entertainment. It might be an art, but it is that art, which entertains. No one can entertain you, like Tarantino. Nonlinear story telling, colorful character, it has everything that a great Tarantino film can offer to a movie lover.
2 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Argo (2012)
9/10
Ignore the haters. It's a must see movie, a true gem, a great cinematic experience.
12 April 2015
Foremost of all, just ignore all haters. It's a must see movie, a true gem, a great cinematic experience. I am a steady follower of IMDb movie title review segment. And I have true respect for most of the experienced IMDb title reviewers, for their great knowledge, taste and love for the movies. Usually, IMDb title review discussion is a must see section for me, before selecting a new or unseen movie. It aids me to choose great movies, from the huge ocean of the world movies. But unfortunately, on a number of occasions this formula of giving importance on title review before watching a movie, goes terribly wrong. In case of Argo (2012), it took place again. Merely two of first ten title reviews of this movie, reviewed in a positive fashion, the balance of the seven were haters. But how come? Specially, for such a great movie, like "Argo", I don't understand. I've gone through some of the bad reviews and point out main reason which they identify as negative aspects of the movie. Let me cast my opinion on that alleged issue, which I acknowledge.

Most of the haters questions about factual accuracy of the event. Their allegations mostly like; this and that did not occur in real event or politically biased story telling etc, etc. Remember the objective of a movie is to entertain people by telling a gripping story on a 70mm film, not educating people about history, unless it is an educational documentary or video. A director could add or deduct anything in his story in order to complete a good movie according to his own satisfaction, irrespectively in case of a true story or in a fictional story. And a movie should be judged on its merit. Of course movie makers has their own responsibility towards society, that is a different issue. In case of 'Argo' it is a brilliant cinematic adoption of the actual event, my rating is 9 on 10.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Monster (2003)
9/10
Unique humanitarian tell of a serial killer's life.
6 October 2014
First time in my life, I felt sorry for a serial killer. Charlize Theron was astonishing as Aileen Wuornos, it was one of the greatest performances I've seen in years. Movies are a form of storytelling and this is a unique humanitarian way of telling story, of a notorious serial killer's life. Hats off to Patty Jenkins. Usually I like to watch serial killer movies which are made from the cop's point of view. Because I don't have any interest on how they become a monster, I don't like to travel their sick complex mind. Monster (2003) was an exception to that and what an exception, it was! The Aileen Wuornos's capture scenario could have been better. I've seen a couple of documentaries based on Aileen Wuornos real life. It was literary a tough-tense state of affairs for the police who caught her. Because she was angry, hopeless, broken and a ruthless killer. I guess the film misses this part's excitement. Anyway, for me, it is a recommended movie for all movie lovers of this genre.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed