It's clear early on that the guy interviewing was out for the cops blood. I was 13 when this happened. It was SHOCKING because this stuff didn't happen daily like it does now. This was new territory for everyone and if you're a reasonable person, you can understand where the police were coming from. There were a lot of obstacles and let's say they did shoot what they thought was one guy and it was 3? They knew it was bad, but from their vantage point it was really hard to gauge what exactly was going on. There were no security cameras, no cell phones. I understand from the victims point of view too. 77 minutes is an eternity and what they went through was horrific. The whole thing was a debacle, but I feel like the film was trying really hard to create a bigger issue. I will say that not naming the killer once was commendable and I really like listening about the victims from their loved ones. I haven't thought about this story in so many years....but it's honestly not much different from today. The killer actually tried to get mental help and his call wasn't returned. The first officer on the scene essentially had a squirt gun compared to what this guy had. Civilian's don't need these weapons.
Worth watching, but watching this guy interview was infuriating at times.
Worth watching, but watching this guy interview was infuriating at times.
Tell Your Friends