As a youngster, I longed for the Messiah who would rescue us from sickness and sorrow. In the Jewish belief, he'll come eventually. In the Christian perspective, He's come and gone, promising to return one day. Reluctantly, I found neither prospect satisfying, feeling that thousands of years of waiting had passed in vain.
Reading comic books, I discovered that Superman ran circles around Jesus. The latter walked on a shallow body of water calming a small storm, healed a few lives, and chose not to combat his tormentors. The former, however, leaps off tall buildings changing the course of mighty rivers, saves millions of lives, and fights a never ending battle for truth and justice.
Superman was originated by Jewish writers giving him an Hebraic name, Kal-El, cast in a Mosaic role as a stranger from planet Krypton adopted by the loving Kent family. His legend gradually grew messianic, the quasi-Christian foundation firmly established in Superman Returns which frequently labels him "savior".
The film states it openly: Marlon Brando's voice of Jor-El, Superman's father, announces that he has sent his only son to show humanity the light of the world. Critical to the movie's premise is that Jor-El's son parallel God's Son. Frankly, most Biblical movies fail in presenting Jesus Himself as Christlike, because it's so difficult for a performer to portray such an exalted symbol of goodness. The 1959 Ben-Hur approaches the closest. Never showing the face of Jesus, we witness His roughened carpenter's hands caressing the thirsty Charlton Heston. This lovingkindness, central to Christ's essence, is brazenly absent from many professed Christians, especially politicians.
Behold, in comparison, Christlike characteristics exuding from actor Brandon Routh's interpretation, described by director Bryan Singer as "radiant". This Man of Steel, possessing incalculable strengths, exhibits a tenderness, a sweetness, a kindness so rare in men that detractors dismiss him as gay. But a man's expression of heartfelt love as opposed to "making love" is not a matter of sexual preference. When Kal-El lifts Lois Lane skyward, figuratively ascending towards Heaven, his solace transcends anything sexual. Be honest with yourself, whatever your gender or orientation, don't you wish for this heavenly figure's embrace?
(And we mustn't assume that Jason, the revealed son of Superman, is the result of ungodly fornication: both he and Kal-El, like Jesus, may have been conceived without sexual union. We are simply unaware how procreation is achieved by Kryptonians.)
Jesus was divine but also human, experiencing suffering. Superman suffers mentally, primarily loneliness, and his physical invulnerability lessens upon exposure to rays of deadly kryptonite. Humanizing the Super Being facilitates identification between him and us.
Unfortunately, although The Passion of the Christ film blatantly reminded audiences that Jesus was brutally beaten, it ineffectively communicated the underlying passion (forgive the pun) of the beating. Romans did not believe Jesus was divine, He was merely a troublesome Jew, not a unique personality. Thus there is a mechanical tone to the horror: in today's violent culture it's equivalent to watching the terrors of war on TV as one eats dinner.
In contrast, the savage pummeling of Superman by Luthor and his henchmen is intimately personal, so shocking and repulsive that most critics are bereft of comment. Try looking closely (if you're able: my eyes were flooded with tears) and perceive how the men grab at Superman's head and face, how they manhandle the remainder of his body, how Luther mounts him before piercing his side with a kryptonite shard. My God, this is more than mauling, this is sexual assault, this is the virtual rape of a man. Ironically, the PG13 rating, forbidding explicit depictions, adds to the intensity of the scene. Recall the Psycho shower where no knife was in fact shown penetrating skin, yet is more graphic than gross slasher flicks.
Equally disturbing is that Superman, admittedly severely weakened, sobs in anguish while not even attempting to resist. His turning the other cheek is, realistically, the trauma of infinite indignity paralyzing him, similar to other rape victims. Some detractors again classify his behavior as gay. If so, they should level the same accusation against Jesus who submitted because of his Father's will.
Despite mortal wounds, Superman saves the world from Luther's menace, subsequently falling to earth arms stretched outward. (In other words, unlike Jesus, Superman "comes down the cross" to rectify wrongs.) Succumbing to his injuries, Superman dies (actually recuperative Kryptonian suspended animation) and later resurrects. Resolved is the conflict fashioned at the movie's beginning: unsuccessfully searching five years for his biological home Krypton, he had returned to his adopted home Earth, apologizing profusely for abandoning us. This messiah will stay, at least for movie sequels.
Religious authorities, of course, have ready responses differentiating the two saviors. Superman is fiction whereas they claim God is real. Christ came not to impress us with His powers, but to die for our sins so believers could attain eternal afterlife in Heaven. Since the date of His return is unknown, we shouldn't wait for His reappearance, instead focus on living virtuously, spreading His Word. As for rampant evil on earth, it's God's will to test our mettle. He does allow moments of doubt and anger for seeming to have forsaken our plight.
After years of reflection, I'm still longing for the Messiah but I recognize this: look up in the sky and you'll see birds and planes but no Superman. Rather, observe the miracle of creation, something science cannot adequately explain. The mystery of life furnishes hope that someday our earth may indeed be saved by a super visitor.
Thus the allegory of Superman has shown us the Light Of The World, Jor-El's prophecy fulfilled.
5 out of 8 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends