Reviews

24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Bad Education: A Christmas Carol (2023)
Season 5, Episode 0
2/10
every show jumps a shark if on too long
15 December 2023
This is by far the worse of all Bad education shows. It seems more like a show case for the formerly minor character, played by Layton Williams.

Layton is not strong enough as either an actor or comedian to hold a show together, and adding various music numbers doesn't help either.

One to avoid, and clearly time to retire this show.

The basic plot is the usual Christmas Carol guff, but it's been done better by hundreds of others.

Layton threatens to leave the schools, and is visited by various characters from when the show was watchable, who turn up as the various ghosts.

Lame, predicable and totally locaking in laughs.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wreck (2022– )
3/10
Comedy?
10 October 2022
I watched episode one as it was listed as a comedy. Can anyone point to any time during there first episode where there was anything funny? Please, someone tell me the time I need to go back to, to check for a single laugh. Or is this a post-modern wokery inspired label, where something is listed as something it isn't?

I won't be bothering with future episodes. This one is a dead duck. The main character, the brother searching for answers about his sister, is played by someone I presume is fresh from acting school. He's incredibly wooden.

The script is too basic, too linear. There is very little I can think of that redeems this show in anyway.
33 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fresh (2022)
4/10
Not a comedy
9 March 2022
On which planet can this be called a comedy? Perhaps younger folk have a different sense of humour to me, but this macabre movie is devoid of all humour. It's a straight horror movie with no laughs.

Difficult to but too much description without spoilers, so I'll leave it there.
14 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The King (I) (2019)
7/10
Historical inaccuracy
14 February 2022
A well produced film, a wonderful cast of actors, but too many unnecessary historical inaccuracies spoilt it. Mechanical toys cam to Europe two hundreds years after Henry became king. His brother Thomas did not die before his father. The work 'f-u-c-k' was not a common usage in the era. Plus many other issues.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lazy Susan: Episode #1.1 (2022)
Season 1, Episode 1
1/10
Where's the humour
3 February 2022
I mistakenly watched this, as I thought it was a comedy. After less than 10 minutes I gave up. Tedious nonsense: middle class women pretending to be working class in dubious sketches, showing how out of touch the BBC is.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Tuckers (2020–2022)
3/10
Middle Class BBC directors think this is comedy
27 January 2022
Why is it that BBC producers think every white working class family should be portrayed as lovable rogues. This adds various stereotypes for Roma families into the mix, including a fist boxer and a mother who sells flowers and casts curses on those who don't buy.

BBC needs to replace the producers with actual working class people, like Alan Bennet, who understand working class humour beyond this offensive garbage. The UK has a wealth of genuine working class entertainment talent; none of whom came anywhere near this nonsense.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It takes talent to movies this bad
8 June 2021
With so many well known faces, this should have been a dead good film. Instead it was a dead movie walking.

Seems the writers and director spent too much time trying to cram in references to older zombie films they forgot to instill anything new or worthwhile to the genre.

Possibly Bill Murray's worst ever movie. Seems most of the big names were reluctant to put much effort in to this.

Slow, draining, boring.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
amateur hour
8 June 2019
A poor mans rip-off of Shaun of the Dead, and amateur in every aspect. Script, acting, sound and lighting were all incompetent. There is nothing salvageable about this movie.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
identity politics for kids
20 October 2018
Another Hollywood attempt to brainwash kids in to being pigeon holed. Kids are only one type; one identity, rather than individuals with a mix of abilities or multiple intelligences. Highly inappropriate sexualisation of teenagers made me feel the directors and writers need to keep away from children. The male hero seemed to constantly lick his lips in a lascivious manner when looking at the female protagonist. My daughter said he was him creepy. Too many plot holes to mention in one review and to avoid spoilers.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How It Ends (2018)
3/10
Amateur film making from Hollywood
16 July 2018
Tired, tedious and implausible. Very little to be positive about. I watched because of FW, but will avoid that mistake in the future. The linear storyline fumbles from one type of unnatural disaster after the other, without any rational or consequence. The script writers kept closely to the school child formula of predictable predicament solution predicament solution. When one of the cast disappears without notice halfway through, I presumed it was because the actor gave up and left. One to avoid. A misdirected disaster of a disaster movie.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Demon House (2019)
1/10
Fraudulent
20 March 2018
Possibly the most pointless movie ever created. A host of a 'well known' haunted house TV show (I'd never heard of him, but I'll take that on face value) creates a movie based entirely on hype. There is absolutely nothing to see in the movie worthy of the description horror. A documentary? No. A documentary is supposed to be a factual retelling of true events, not a fraudulent fiction. Some movies are so bad, they becomes classics. Don't be fooled, this isn't one of them.
51 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Expelled (2014)
Encouraging Criminal Activity?
25 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The basic moral of this story is that you can commit crime after crime, encourage criminal activity with other teenagers, not get jailed, so long as you can blackmail someone not to inform the police. Hilarious?

I ended up watching this because my daughters had it playing through Netflix whilst I was working in the same room. This is no pleasant movie and certainly not suitable for children as it encourages repeat criminal behaviour, including hiding felons and jail breaking, hacking, breaking and entering, theft, blackmail, fraud and deceit. I needed to discuss the rights and wrongs of the behaviour encouraged in the movie with my daughters during and at the end; explaining that anyone committing these various acts would be jailed for 20 to 40 years in total.

The main character players plays it for laughs as he encourages other to be complicit in his crimes. He badgers his girlfriend and another friend to commit fraud and cover up his crimes, later having them help blackmail someone.

Whoever thought this was a good idea for a movie needs to be committed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lost direction and 1 dimensional
21 May 2015
Whilst not as bad as the rating implies this could have been so much better with a better writer: No subplots and a one dimensional storyline shows the writer(s) are not very talented. However, Tom Green made a decent start and the first half was very watchable. Unfortunately about half way through the story meandered meaninglessly. With no obvious direction the viewer ends up getting distracted and looses interest. I guess this is why the movie ends up getting poor reviews and low stars. So overall, for me, the scriptwriters have to take the blame for this as they seemed to have become bored and loose interest in writing a decent story about half way through.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Returned (2013)
4/10
Outdated AIDS allegory
4 March 2014
If this was made in the 1980s it may have had more relevance. However, in an age when HIV doesn't have the stigma levels it used to, it seems to be misplaced.

The story is slow and acting quality was middle of the road, with the actors being too serious for a zombie movie.

The script reminded me of college student projects with too many predictive stereotypical lines "I just wanted to let you know you're still the same guy to me," says the male friend in a bar when he finds out he's a zombie (or the politically correct Returned).

It just doesn't move along at any sensible pace or seemingly with any intent for the first 30 minutes or so. I wasn't sure if the writers / director knew which direction they wanted to take the movie: highlight bigotry (and create a yawn fest) or entertaining drama (which it never became).
16 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
On the Road (2012)
3/10
Low budget acting - big budget melodrama
10 August 2013
Give an 18 year old film student 25 thousand dollars and they'd do a better job than this 25 million dollar disappointment. They'd hire genuine actors, not the sulky here today gone tomorrow types whose insincerity kills a movie within five minutes. The lighting never seemed quite right, especially indoors; cheap effects to create a false mood because the actors (sic) where not able to create the tension needed.

Seriously, where did the money go? Especially if you believe Kristen took a huge pay cut (she was possible deluded to think this monstrosity could pick up Academy nods).

Acting was 90210 style. Vacuous, wince to look deep nonsense. None of the characters were believable and so far removed from the original novel if the author were still alive he be suing; the audience who came to see the novel in film rather than Stewarts boobs certainly have a case for a full refund based on a trades description act violation.

I didn't like it.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Beyond stupidity
21 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The action part is good, hence 3 stars.

The premise, however, is beyond stupidity and there are far more plot holes than usually seen in this kind of action movie.

US Presidents are dispensable. If any were threatened the response would not be to capitulate.

At various points special forces would have been inside WH. They could have taken out Hydra and followed through. Surveillance would have moved faster to take out the handful of terrorists.

I know the audience are often asked to suspend disbelief and go with the flow, but this film asked too much.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shopping (1994)
3/10
A naughty boy and girl cause some bother
4 January 2013
Jude Law and Sadie Frost pretend (I don't like to use the word act for such dreadful performances) to be a naughty boy and girl. Frost throws in a faux Irish accent, because being Irish surely makes you sound harder. However, the accent is bad throughout: she ranges from Belfast to Limerick to Essex. By stealing cars and using lots of bad language, the pair go on an adventure to tease the police and raid some shops. At one point Sadie licks the face of a mannequin and hints at something more genuine; however the next police pursuing a car scene leading the police into an urban ambush is back to unintended satire. It is almost a mockumentary on the famous four comic strip style by trying to look so over the top to go beyond the ridiculous. Sean Pertwee is a laughable oik from his first presence, sat on the banisters watching the low lifes play in his criminal arcade emporium (seriously, he was playing a rogue who ran a games shop for teenagers – but being in a disused run down place was supposed to make it a bit gritty). Slapping a car roof to show his annoyance at the naughty children (Frost and Law) getting into bother with the busies is about the level of such a misguided film; although he gets into even more of a bad temper when he hits a pipe against other pipes half way through the 'movie'. Some reviewers says this has dated too early. I would suggest it hasn't dated at all; awful on release, awful almost 20 years later.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Death (2010)
9/10
Clever writing
12 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
A rather clever bit of writing; at least I presume it is clever as the take I have on the film is as follows: What seems to be one thing is really the opposite.

Those who seem to come as heroes, those coming in god's name, are in fact those who bring death and misery. The heroes become the villains and vice versa. There are no real heroes here; the necromancer is perhaps not as she appears. Rather than leading the villagers down the wrong path, she actually protected them from the pestilence outside the village walls.

Who are the evil ones? Surely not villagers who follow a life without a god; they were content and living a good life until god's army arrived with pestilence. The young hero monk? Nothing of the sort. He murdered the woman he loved and then went on to murder many more innocent women. The messenger of god, Sean B, brought death to the village through the plague.

The summation of the film; follow god and bring evil - religion is what is wrong in the world. Live without god and live a happy and contented life.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Where did the money go?
26 November 2010
Although I'm not the biggest will Farrel fan in the world, I'll eventually get round to giving his films a go. Land of the Lost turned up on HBO so I sat and watched... I'd already checked the summary here; the stars weren't too low so I stuck it out. Big mistake. One of the worst big budget movies I've seen in a very long time. The estimate of $100,000,000 for this pile of manure must surely be a mistake. Where did the money go? $30 million for Will? $20 million for Anna, 10c for the other guy? That still leaves (after my very over inflated suggestions (I reckon Anna really us about a tenth of the above) where did the other 50million get spent? There's no significant cast other than the main three characters? The effects are nothing unusual for this day and age, and some of it reminded me of Mork & Mindy days they were so basic. The script was so awful, they clearly weren't paying much for that. Musical score? Nope, mostly out of copyright show tunes. Someone, please explain to me: Where did the money go?
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Disappointing
10 May 2009
I saw the trailers, enjoyed King of Queens, and thought I'd enjoy this Kevin James jaunt as a Saturday afternoon film. A film which should be quietly enjoyable and give a few laughs.

What I watched was mind-numbing garbage. Whilst I didn't expect anything too original, I didn't think I'd get such unoriginal, factory fodder. There was nothing to be enjoyed, and almost everything was too expected. The little that was marginally original was creepy. I felt like screaming to the love interest, don't go any near that stalker as he zoomed in on CTV then offered a lift on his mop-mobile. Would anyone say yes if a creepy guy offered to put his arms around you on his Segway when you just met the guy; especially one with stalker tendencies? The scene in the bar that followed was just as painful to watch, and even more reason for the love interest to run a mile.

The writers seemed to forget that if you're going to create formula movies, with a loser you need the audience to like, that there has to be something positive and likable about the character. I can't think about anything redeeming during the first twenty minutes. The writers took too many liberties with the audience and just presumed, 'Hey, this is an actor everyone likes, we don't need to make any effort in the script to support this.' This is not Kevin James greatest moment. The box office receipts merely show how successful good advertising can be, no matter how bad the product is.
34 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Omen (2006)
2/10
Dreadful Remake of a Classic
21 February 2007
When a group of movie execs decide to do a remake of a classic they are looking at the bottom line. Releasing Omen on the 6th day, of the 6th month in the 6th year was just the push they needed to put on this project. What a mistake.

No sensible producer would ever remake Casablanca or Gone with The Wind. Both of these classics are scene after scene perfect. Likewise, the original Omen film was so polished that it was difficult to see how they could improve things. Do you follow the book and film closely or do a different take? Unfortunately all too often with this film they choose the frame by frame imitation, and each was a pale imitation of the original.

Take the dramatic scene where Damien cycles around eventually bumping his mum over the banister. In the original the sound track was genius, it built the momentum and climaxed perfectly. In this tawdry remake there was no mood build up, no tension. The score, as throughout the rest of the film, was limp.

The writer tried too hard to match real modern events with the apocalyptic apocrypha, but as they were out of synch they would have been better left out. The writing would have been just as entertaining, if not more so, if events were invented to match with the book of Revelation's predications; suggestions that the sea in Revelation 8 somehow refers to politics is just plain stupid.

The cast was a troop of misfits. Julia Styles was wooden and Liev Schreiber always looked out of place; whilst Lee Remick and Gregory Peck are always going to be impossible to beat, these two TV quality stars were never going to be in the same league. I felt sorry for the real actors, the three British thespians normally found in better productions; Michael Gambon, Pete Postlethwaite and David Thewlis. David Thewlis struggled throughout to make his part worthy, but was constantly fighting against the cardboard cut-out of Schreiber that was always by his side. Michael Gambon looked apologetic for taking his bit part; he looked almost embarrassed in his scenes.

To conclude, a poorly executed film aimed to tie in with a single day. It would have been better to have kept this project as a TV movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
As awful as the The Royal Tenenbaums
27 November 2005
As pretentious as it is unfunny. The first half hour, like the Tenenbaums incidentally, sent me to sleep. It had the same over stylised staged shooting and the same boring, dull, lifeless pace. With an almost identical cast the director has shown he lacks any imagination and still pines for the success of his only decent film, Rushmore; but has not matured since then. He hasn't learnt what made Rushmore watchable and his latest fiasco's drivel.

When you look at the potential of the cast, except for Huston whom I've never enjoyed watching and is very over rated as an actress, you'd think that something could have come from this. Bill Murray is one of my favourite comedic actors - from Stripes to Translation he's been fabulous - and one of the reasons I thought I'd give this a go. But Wes managed to squeeze all life out of Murray's talents.

Not even worth spending a boring Sunday afternoon with: avoid it.
19 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Simple, unchallenging entertainment that doesn't pretend to be something it isn't.
13 November 2005
I read the IMDb scores and reviews before watching House of the Dead and thought I'd watch to see just how bad it was. I was pleasantly surprised to spend an hour and a half watching a decent film; much better than a lot of big budget stuff, such as some of the Hollywood remakes of some horror classics. So long as you understand the budget background, and find lower budget films entertaining - such as great Brit Flicks like Shawn of the Dead -there's something worth watching here. I'm guessing this was more of a Canadian film than USA, and that seems to show in the whole manner of the film. I've often found that many Canadian movies to have some magic ingredient that makes them stand out, but an ingredient that doesn't taste good to the masses.

The effects were appropriate for the low budget background; don't expect the sort of stuff you see in Resident Evil. Apart from too much dialogue to the audience at the beginning, the direction and production quality was good. The acting was appropriate for the roles without being award quality; bimbos were bimbos, tough guys were tough guys, etc. The lead role (J Cherry) was the usual brooding thoughtful hero type.

Simple, unchallenging entertainment that doesn't pretend to be something it isn't. If you are a fan of the original game or game genre you should like it.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Another great British tongue-in-cheek bit of slapstick.
26 October 2004
Just watched SOTD. Haven't laughed so much for ages. Brilliantly funny. The UK viewers will recognise the faces, but doubt many outside the UK will.

Being a particularly British sense of humour it probably won't travel well (esp. over the pond to the US). Still, I recommend it to all and everyone. Simon Pegg was the funniest I've seen him. The supporting cast were also very good. Nick Frost shows he's more than just silly Bravo channel silliness. Dylan Moran was so so, pretty much playing the same Dylan Moran character he always plays; I'm sure he could expand his repertoire if he wanted. On a purely fun level, a great way to while away 99 minutes; nine out of ten.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed