Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Terrific Performances All Around
16 March 2013
Every performance in this haunting film is stellar, including Dean Martin's. Much has been said about him being miscast but I disagree. Despite his being a perennial loser, the character of Julian must be so attractive, charming and fun as a person that he can capture the hearts of fresh young things like Lily and older, more experienced women like his connected and moneyed benefactor alike. Part of Julian's problem is that his personal attractiveness has allowed him to skate through one catastrophic life choice after another while women, most often his older sisters, who also get all giggly at the very thought that he might come swinging through the door any minute, have always been there to bail him out and nurse him back to health.

His child-like and overly animated conversation with Lily's mother is a key indicator here. He is still very much a little boy at this point in the story, yet you can see his irresistible personal charm and attractiveness is also working on his own mother-in-law.

These are qualities that were intrinsic to Dean Martin's real life and his professional persona. And the film camera being as unforgiving as it is in revealing a certain "biology is destiny" truth about a person's look, manner and aura, I don't believe Jason Robards Jr., who created the role on stage and was a fine actor on both stage and screen, would have been able to pull it off in the movie. Yes, Paul Newman could have pulled it off. But so could Dean Martin. His performance is one of the things I enjoy most about watching this as I do every few years on my old TCM DVD-R copy of it (we really need an official DVD/Blu-ray release of this soon). His final scenes with Page and Hiller are standouts. It is thrilling to see Julian's growth into manhood for the first time in his life under these brutal circumstances as Dean Martin portrays him.

This is a dramatic performance that, IMO, surpasses his previous impressive dramatic performances in The Young Lions, Career, Some Came Running and Rio Bravo.

And on the issue of questions about the family resemblance (or lack there of) among the three siblings, I'm not sure that is such a critical oversight of the filmmakers considering the musical chairs heritage elements found elsewhere in the story. Questionable lineage/parentage is an openly discussed factor for at least two other characters. It wouldn't be a stretch to consider the possibility that the three siblings in this old New Orleans family might have been the product of two or more fathers. The two "old maid" sisters are overly conservative and averse to outsiders to an almost neurotic level. Was this the result of a mother who instilled this fear in her daughters in order to atone for her own wild youth? Possible. I just think the question of whether Dean Martin, Wendy Hiller and Geraldine Page look enough alike to be taken for siblings is not much of a distraction and, in its own way under the circumstances of this story, might even add something of value to consider.
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Racist Movie
9 August 2004
I knew we would get there eventually.

Not that the Korean and Indian characters were depicted as intelligent, charming, clever, resourceful, insightful, courageous and inherently sexy.

Fine by me.

Not that virtually every non-white character with at least one line of dialog is depicted as attractive with a sincere sweetness, as a victim of social injustice or violence struggling to survive in an unrelenting world of bigotry.

Why not? I like sweetness as much as the next guy.

But to have literally EVERY white character (with one tiny exception) to be depicted as a puss-ridden, hate-filled, fecal obsessed, sex-crazed, race-baiting, scamming and conniving, thieving, relentlessly violent psychotic of one kind or another strains the "comedy" a little far for my taste. (the tiny exception is the chubby White Castle employee whose one or two lines are in the "May I help you?" category).

And it isn't so much that the racism enters into a "comedy" that isn't even about racism enough to be making a commentary on it. At least then it would make sense for so many vicious White stereotypes to be trotted out.

But it isn't about racism (no, the title doesn't allude to anything like that). The Korean and Indian students are, in fact, rather privileged and spoiled. This "comedy" is only about two guys in search of pot, food to satisfy their pot-induced munchies and one of the guy's quest to overcome his shyness to ask a girl out on a date. Nothing more.

Not exactly the platform to justify all the outrageous anti-White sentiment.

Perhaps what's most disturbing of all about where we have "gotten" is that there have been several positive reviews by the Roepers and the Eberts of the bigtime media for this movie and several reviews posted here on this board without even a mention of it. The few comments about "racism" that I've read or heard would almost make one think they were talking about anti-KOREAN or anti-Indian racism. But that isn't really in this movie. No, the racism in this movie is all about vile White people.

The irony is that the same day I saw HaKGTWC, I had just read an L.A. Times article about all the flack one theater owner was getting for scheduling a screening of the landmark film, BIRTH OF A NATION (1915), because of it's treatment of the historical origins of the KKK after the abolishment of slavery in America and how some might be offended by it's insensitive depiction of black people.

Maybe this 2004 movie was meant to add some balance to the universe.
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed