3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Primer (2004)
10/10
If you have the patience, it's fantastic
5 May 2014
There are so many reasons to love Primer, I could go on all day, but for the purposes of this review I will narrow it down to two. First, this is one of the only films I've ever seen that never attempts to "dumb it down" for the audience. There seems to be a consensus among mainstream filmmakers that viewers are lazy and won't respond to complexity. Or, if there is any element of complexity in the plot then it needs to be limited to a couple scenes and explained away later or dwarfed by other elements of the production. I will tell you this, don't expect to understand Primer the first time around. I've now seen it twice and can't wait to see it many more times. Even though it keeps you entertained the first time around, this is a film that requires multiple viewings, and probably outside explanation as well. I certainly don't claim to understand everything that happened, but that doesn't matter. Have fun with slowly unraveling the plot, there are a lot of interesting blogs out there dedicated to explaining what exactly is happening. I'll just say it now, that if you're a lazy viewer who simply wants explanations handed to you then this is not a film for you. But if you have the attention span and are willing to devote the time then this is a very rewarding cinematic experience.

The other thing I'd like to say is that the story that a film tells is not completely limited to your experience while watching it. I love when a film has a great story to tell behind the scenes, when it struggled to survive and made it through obstacles that would doom most other productions. Primer has such a story. It was made on a budget of only $7000 on location around Dallas. The director, Shane Carruth, at the time was an engineer who wrote, directed, starred in, edited, and wrote the score for Primer. Apparently the post-production process was such a burden Carruth wanted to scrap the whole project. All this work was eventually rewarded with the top prize at the Sundance Film Festival and a now devoted following (myself included). It's great to see a lot of hard work and talent be rewarded in this way, and I'm still excited to see what he will do from here on out.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Citizen Kane (1941)
10/10
A work of art
1 September 2013
I don't know if there is such a thing as a "perfect" movie, but this comes as close as anything I have ever seen. I recently re-watched Citizen Kane for the first time since high school. I don't know why it took me so long to watch it again, probably because the first time I saw it I was a little underwhelmed. I'll just chalk that up to immaturity though, this is most certainly one of the best films I've ever seen. Students of film history can tell you all about the innovative camera techniques and such that make this film very important. I prefer to just focus on the actual experience of watching it. First of all, every scene (and I truly do mean every scene) is absolutely visually stunning. You could pretty much take any individual frame and hang it in a gallery, it is that meticulously put together. Aside from that, it's just a great story. I don't usually find biopics about "great men" very compelling, as they have a tendency to elevate people to this almost god-like, larger-than-life status that causes me to just become disconnected and not care at all about the main character. Citizen Kane does precisely the opposite, it takes a "great man" in the eyes of society and brings him down to a human level. Ultimately Kane is just like everyone else, a man in search of lasting happiness that proves more elusive than it seems it should. If you haven't seen Citizen Kane, or even if it's been a long time, then go watch it as soon as possible. You certainly will not regret it.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A very unfortunate piece of film history
1 September 2013
First off, let me acknowledge that I completely understand why Birth of a Nation is a landmark film. If you are interested in film history it truly should be on your list of essential viewing. HOWEVER, let's be honest, being important for technical reasons and being a good movie are two very different things. I am amazed reading through so many of these reviews how people will readily admit not enjoying watching it then still give it nine or ten stars simply because the techniques used to make it were innovative. Even if we ignore the fact that every scene is horrifyingly racist (from the beginning, it makes the case that the KKK was an essential response to the oppression white southerners were experiencing from newly freed slaves, I mean come on people!!!), it still doesn't hold up as being enjoyable at all. It is way too long, boring, emotionally distant (you are never given a chance to connect with or care about any of the characters), the plot is both historically inaccurate and not compelling whatsoeverÂ… altogether it's just a mess.

That being said, I will reiterate my point that students of history ought to watch this for its historic significance. But let's be honest in our discussion, this is a very unfortunate piece of movie history that's important to watch and not to enjoy. So everyone please, stop giving it positive reviews.
16 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed