Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
He was growing something more than just corn...
30 May 2005
I won't say that this was the worst movie I have ever seen, because there are sure a lot of stinkers. However this seems to be the worst well reviewed movie. A lot of people thought it was great; I just found it to be moronic. The reluctant corn farmer (played by Kevin Costner) hears voices telling him to build a baseball field in his corn field. He somehow is able to obtain the lights and necessary equipment to do so. Don't even try to make sense of any of the logic in this movie - there isn't any. Once the field is built a bunch of ghost baseball players come out of the cornfields to play ball. However only a few people (probably those who have used LSD) can see them.

Through it all despite the fact that his loss of cropland used to build this ball is going to cause the them to lose the farm Costner grinds on with steely resolve. Farmer Costner's wife played by some actress that I thankfully have never seen before.) supports him all the way with a kind of annoying perkiness and pluck that she must have learned from watching tapes of Kathy Lee Gifford and Katie Couric. As this ludicrous farce progresses Costner drives off to pick up a washed-up hippy author played by James Earl Jones. The character of Jones has nothing to do with the plot of the movie but apparently those who made it just wanted him in the movie. Costner and Jones then pick up the ghost of a ball player turned doctor (played by Burt Lancaster.) Lancaster loved being a doctor but always regretted giving up playing ball now he has a second chance until he save Costners daughter from choking on a hot-dog. She was accidentally pushed off the bleachers by the farmers evil banker brother-in-law who has come to foreclose on the farm's mortgage. Once Lancaster has become a doctor to save the child's life he can no longer play ball. As I wrote before don't even try to figure out this. films logic. Everything ends well however since there are cares lined up in front of the farm to pay 20 dollars to watch ghosts play baseball. the ghost of Costner's character's father, a one time ball player then shows up to play catch with his son - Oh how sweet! The best thing about the movie was that it finally ended. Do not watch this piece of garbage.
58 out of 139 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
masons love it
29 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The movie reads like an advertisement for Free Masonry. Its OK but could have been much better. The whole part about clues being on the Declaration of Independence was far-fetched to say the least. The acting was pretty good. Although the villains played it a bit heavy.

That seems to be the case in most action movies. I also thought it a bit idiotic that all the really bad guys were British. Overall I Would wait until its on cable. I find it really hard to write a ten line review of this movie as I truly think that is 8 lines more than the plot. I don't mean to be nit-picky because this is kind of a fun fantasy type movie but it really had a lot of flaws mostly having to do with how well preserved 200 year old items were.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
it's a Christian thing an atheist wouldn't understand:
27 May 2005
Most of the reviews here seem to be written by Godless mockers who are just trying to be smart *sses. Although in order to make it interesting the movie has added a bunch of junk about computer "codes" the movie really does seem to do a good job following Biblical prophecy. Hal Lindsey who is a well known expert on biblical prophecy was an adviser. First read the book of Daniel then read the Book of Revelation. By the way this movie has nothing whatsoever to do with Nostradamus. The Movie would have been better if the sequel "Omega code" had been bundled with it. Thats really all I have to say but since that is less than ten lines I need to babble on like the rest of the people here who want to make them selves seem important.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
it's a Christian thing an atheist wouldn't understand
27 May 2005
Most of the reviews here seem to be written by Godless mockers who are just trying to be smart *sses. Although in order to make it interesting the movie has added a bunch of junk about computer "codes" the movie really does seem to do a good job following Biblical prophecy. Hal Lindsey who is a well known expert on biblical prophecy was an adviser. First read the book of Daniel then read the Book of Revelation. By the way this movie has nothing whatsoever to do with Nostradamus. The movie would have been better if the sequel Meggido had been bundled with it. Thats really all I have to say but since that is less than ten lines I need to babble on like the rest of the people here who want to make them selves seem important other wise it won't be accepted.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed