Reviews

23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
London Fields (2018)
8/10
London Fields: Yes, but there's no reason for any of this.
12 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Well, there is one reason, for me. Reasons for others may vary.

But the story is certainly not a reason. These characters never needed to meet, and there's just no reason for them to be doing anything that they're doing. I think that as a viewer, that makes it jarring and awkward to watch, because I keep asking, "Yes, but why though..." That lack of worthwhile motivations makes it feel like someone is annoying me and wasting my time. Someone like Jim Sturgess, who plays a kind of human rat, someone I'd never want to spend more than a minute or two talking with.

Mr. Sturgess is making a lot of unfortunate choices. He plays a meth addict who is also a darts champion, and is always dressed in either shades of mud or in Gucci pajamas. His teeth are yellowish green and he is always making a face like a kid makes when they are making fun of someone else who is crying. This kind of raffish delinquent would have to be played as funny to be memorable. They do try for some broad humor with the scenes of Nicola Six vamping and sashaying around him while he struggles to keep up and exude some bravado, but he's just so repulsive it's hard to watch him. I'd've said, just don't do the yellow teeth and stop doing that face. Also, he's always getting way to close to people's faces when he talks to them. It's just gross to watch.

This Nicola character that I mentioned is the central character, the most beautiful woman in the world played by the most beautiful blonde in the world, Amber Heard. She's a psychic who is trying to engineer her own death because she saw it in a dream. She sets about manipulating three men: Keith the meth addict dart player as I've described, and also a wealthy young banker named Guy (Theo James) and a novelist named Samson (Billy Bob Thornton).

There's not much to say either of these other two. Guy is a nice looking mannequin in a suit, and Samson is just an observer who narrates. Nicola lets him in on everything that's going on because he wants to write the full story. There seems to be no reason for him either. He's written some books and now suffers from writer's block, and he is temporarily staying in a huge and empty apartment that belongs to another writer named Mark (Jason Isaacs). His situation is a little unrelatable, which is worsened by all the scenes of him listening to messages from Mark, and looking at pictures of Mark as if it's funny how Mark is looking back at him. But we don't know Mark and we barely know Samson. So, none of that lands.

Nicola engages in a game where she tricks Guy into giving her a lot of money that she gives to Keith so he can pay off loan sharks. It's not really for Keith. It's because she knows he has a small daughter. I'm not sure the film makers knew that, though. The scene where that is revealed is not coherent enough to make that clear.

That's a major problem. The script is full of airy, disconnected dialogue and voiceovers that don't contribute to the story.

On the other end of the spectrum from Sturgess's repulsiveness as Keith is Johnny Depp as Check, the best performance in the movie. He plays a scarred, mod-dressed mobster who is ALSO a darts champion and is the loan shark to whom Keith owes money. The make-up job for his scarred face is excellent, and he effortlessly inhabits this charming and scary character.

Nicola's manipulations don't make a lot of sense in the context of her prediction about her murder. At the end, if you paid attention and figured out her motivations, it makes more sense. Oddly, although she claims not to know who her murderer will be, it turns out that she did know all along.

This movie is very well photographed in some beautiful interiors. Amber Heard in beautiful interiors is quite a dazzling sight. Without her, I'd give this movie a 5, and without Johnny Depp, it would be knocked down to a 3. Together, they make it an 8.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's good, despite some really dumb choices.
22 March 2024
The darkest and most wicked of M. Flanagan's Netflix adaptation series. This one differs from Midnight Mass, Bly Manor, and Hill House in that the protagonists are corrupt, evil people. It's a "Succession"-style take on the Sackler family of Big Pharma fame, that weaves in a lot of Edgar Allen Poe themes and easter eggs. It's a lot of fun, and has some pretty gruesome and gory moments. If you're familiar with Poe stories, it's fun to see the possible developments coming, like when you see that one of Usher's daughters is a scientist that experiments on apes. She'll rue the day.

A lot of Poe's character names are randomly applied, and often clumsily. The twink nightclub son is named "Prospero", which I think would have made more sense as the name of the pharmaceutical company. Maybe "Prospera". Fortunato would have been more fitting for the club kid. One daughter is named "Tamerlane", another is named "Victorine", and, like "Prospero" and "Fortunato", never sound quite right.

Casting was weird with this one. I would have switched some of these roles around. The mysterious Verna would have been a perfect role for Katie Siegel. Roderick's sister Madeline would have been a great role for Carla Gugino. Camille "Espanaye", the mean TV propagandist, would have been good for Samantha Sloyan.

The worst casting is Ruth Codd as Roderick's "hot" young trophy wife Juno. There's no real need for this character to be in the story in the first place, and Codd would never be my choice to play a hot young wife.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Every Decision Made was the Wrong Decision.
29 December 2023
Generally, I'm a big fan of Jim Jarmusch. I get his vibe and I enjoy it. But this movie just never landed for me. Every scene was pointless, and every decision made when making this movie was the wrong decision. The theme song is abysmal, which I only note because they play it over and over again. Selena Gomez tells us she loves it two times. I could have enjoyed these characters in a different movie, like a small town crime movie or an ensemble comedy, but not in a zombie movie.

All in all, it feels like a scam for the actors to get together and hang out. Like when Adam Sandler makes a "Grown Ups" movie and puts all his friends in it so they can go to Hawaii. But it's Jim Jarmusch's friends, which means we have to pt up with Tilda Swinton. It's really all a pointless mess.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Killer (2023)
2/10
A Small and Pointless Movie.
28 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Who was this for, and why was it made?

THE KILLER is a pointless exercise in lighting, no more. We've seen this story already so many times, and this is the most basic version yet. Fassbender's character is not interesting and not good at his job. (Haha, remember "The Counselor"? Another movie where he was not interesting and not good at his job). I was rooting against him.

The opening scene of this movie really sums it all up. Watching him do methodical tasks, boring. Annoying voiceover that is just babbling, nothing new. He imposes a dumb rule on himself, which in this case is that he can't take the shot until his pulse rate dips below 60 beats per minute, and when it finally does, he messes up the shot and kills the wrong person.

Why have this dumb rule about his pulse? Because he's stupid. He passes up several good opportunities to take the shot while he's waiting for his apple watch to say that his pulse is below 60. And this is genuinely the easiest hit I've ever seen in a movie. The target is in a very well-lit apartment where one wall is all windows, and the Killer has an empty office space to hole up in and take his shot from right across the street.

Normally the hit man that we follow in a story like this is exceptional in some way. They are especially good at their job, or they have a purpose that guides what contracts they take. Normally, their bosses that turn on them are dishonorable people that broke a code of some sort. Not in this movie, though. Fassbender's Killer is unremarkable and not very good at his job. He is extremely self-conscious and prone to posing and brooding performatively. His boss isn't dishonorable or breaking any kind of code by trying to have him killed. There are no story beats that make the Killer likeable or relatable. He's just kind of a derp.

The movie is split up into "chapters", as if it were novelistic. Just having voiceovers is NOT novelistic. More often than not, they are annoying, as is the case here.

THEN, they wheel out Tilda Swinton. That's become a bad sign in today's movies. That holds true here, too.

It's a small and meaningless movie and a real boring way to waste a couple of hours.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
American Horror Story: Multiply Thy Pain (2023)
Season 12, Episode 1
4/10
Overexplaining everything when they really don't have to.
22 September 2023
This episode had too much clumsy and unnecessary exposition dumping. That makes for unnatural and fake-sounding dialogue, so, a terrible script.

Otherwise, the story seems like it will be interesting and the acting is fine.

So far it looks like a Ryanification of Rosemary's baby, which will probably be a lot of fun. Emma Roberts is always fun. That is a hell of an apartment they live in, too. It's kind of hard to empathize with billionaires like this couple.

The previous season, NYC, was very meaningful and serious. I appreciated the effort and the limb that they boldly crawled out on with that one. This is back to glitzy, plastic form, but will at least be fun.

Hopefully they got all the expo out of the way in this one and future episodes won't be so clunky.
49 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Nine based on the finale alone
23 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The Last Minute, directed by Stephen Norrington is about a young artist (director? Musician? They never say) and Ewan MacGregor lookalike who makes one thing that everybody loves, but then his next effort bombs and his life spins out of control. He ends up living on the streets. It's not a great or particularly fun movie, kind of edgelord early 2000's stuff. It wants to be a Trainspotting or a Run Lola Run, but the music doesn't land and the weird scene in the middle about a medical fetish club is dumb, rather than impressive or interesting (until Jason Isaacs shows up and livens it up considerably).

BUT. The finale has to be seen to be believed. That is all I will say.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Is Karen Horror a new genre?
19 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Visually, this is a beautiful movie, very well done. Good story too. Rebecca Hall's character becomes more and more unlikeable as the movie goes on, though. She plays that role very convincingly. I'd be so disappointed if she is like this in real life.

Something I've noticed about watching a movie is that I think that I expect the protagonist to figure things out the same way I do, when the movie gives both of us the same amount of information. So, when the character does something like bring an obvious evil totem into her house, it seems like a really stupid thing to do. She is set up as a person who is open to believing in the supernatural. So, maybe don't do that. But at that point, I actually thought, "Well, she kind of has it coming".
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Babylon (I) (2022)
10/10
Babylon is a cinema lover's dream
12 January 2023
Great movies happen on their own time. This means that very often they don't come out at the right time for them. Two amazing and wonderful movies that came out within months of this writing are Babylon and Amsterdam. Both of these are cinematic miracles, and American audiences aren't currently in the mood for either of them.

Make no mistake, Babylon is a masterpiece, both beautiful and tragic, and surprisingly, often terrifying. It's one of those Hollywood exposees where they show you how young dreamers go through hell in search of their dreams. There is debauchery, cruelty, high stakes, and wonder.

The cast is phenomenal, a mix of the biggest stars, seasoned actors, new faces, and surprises. Everyone shines.

The story is beautiful, lurid, grotesque and heartbreaking. It stayed with me the whole next day.
24 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Barbarian (2022)
5/10
Entertaining and dumb
17 November 2022
Two better titles for this movie would have been "Resting B***h Face" or "No, Do the Opposite".

The movie is an accurate depiction of America: ruined neighborhoods, poverty, old people living way too long and wallowing in the evil they've done, young people who react to every setback with entitled annoyance, public institutions that refuse to function.

On a meta level, this movie is also emblematic of American pop culture: the buzz around this movie is overblown, as noob movie watchers try to make it out to be amazing, when it is actually very basic and mediocre.

It's common in horror films for the protagonists to split up when they shouldn't, or to open doors that they shouldn't. It is notable that in this movie, every action that each protagonist takes is the exact opposite of what they should do.

On a side note, what really ruined this movie for me was the trailer. Whoever put that trailer together should be fired.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Might not get past episode 2
29 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I am probably not going to get through episode 2 on this one. The script is so bad that it prevents me from enjoying anything.

There is a kind of dialogue that I really don't like, where the normal characters are supposed to be so snarky and clever. I noticed it in another Netflix show, "You", the one about the stalker, and I notice it here too. It's common in shows based on YA fiction.

I absolutely loved Hill House, Bly Manor, and Midnight Mass. I think Flanagan and his actors are all amazing. I want to like Midnight Club too, but it is insufferable because the script is so grating.

Here's a gem from episode 1: "See I'm a sucker for Oscar Wilde, a little meh on Stevenson, I still love, just polite love, My favorite is Shelley, Mary, not her husband, Mary Shelley, the teenage girl who wrote Frankenstein, a teenage girl did that, she was nineteen when she became the mother of modern horror, I mean she wrote the first major work in the science fiction genre, Frankenstein was not only the first story to use science that way, but to deal with the ethics of experiment and the experimenter... haha, sorry, that's why I wrote Shakespeare for my thesis, I tend to ramble when I get going on Shelley..."

OK, we get it, she's smart.

There's another scene in the first episode where the girl is in the hospital and they give her a birthday cake with unlit candles. The dad says, "Well, hospitals aren't exactly in love with open flames, so...".

People don't talk like that. That's the kind of snarky cleverness I mean. Spencer is another one. Everything he says is just too cute.

And I won't even get started on Anya. I get that she's supposed to be abrasive, but they just pour it on with buckets. Her scenes are intolerable.

Flanagan's shows tend to be immersive experiences. It's like you're there, and it works so well when the characters are people you want to know.

All of these characters could be like that, but their lines are just such clunkers.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amsterdam (2022)
9/10
Wonderful Noir
15 October 2022
AMSTERDAM is a Raymond Chandleresque epic noir, by which I mean that the mystery is buried under so many layers that you don't really know what's going on until the end. It is similar to THE BIG SLEEP or INHERENT VICE in that regard. Stories like this are entertaining and you know they're going somewhere, so you take the ride, thrill to the scenes and set pieces, and wait for the pay-off.

AMSTERDAM is also, like INHERENT VICE, the kind of noir where the sleuth isn't a rugged bad-ass, but is instead a more alienated or fringe member of society. In this case there are 2, then 3 protagonists, and together they are in a wonderful friendship.

This is a sweet, humane, and fun movie, wonderfully acted and beautifully filmed. The cast is full of fine actors. But the performance from Christian Bale is really something to behold. He inhabits this wonderful character, this humane and sweet natured Doctor who tries so hard to help, and whose charming and bumbling personality is such a joy to experience.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Munsters (2022)
8/10
It really is a delight
3 October 2022
This is a sweet comedy about people falling in love. It's a rom-com, but better. A delightful little Halloween comedy. Jeff Daniel Phillips and Sheri Moon are wonderful as Herman and Lily. Richard Brake is such a treat as Dr. Frankenstein, and Jorge Garcia (Hurley from Lost) shows up as his assistant. It made me realize how much I've missed his friendly, easy-going nature. He's great fun.

But Daniel Roebuck is the main attraction as Grandpa. His performance is really something special.

It's also a visual delight with 60's stye technicolor all over. Rob Zombie movies have always had great cimematography.

Enjoy!
25 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reboot (2022)
9/10
I love this show.
20 September 2022
This is such a breath of fresh air. First of all, what a cast! They really knocked it out of the park. I love everybody. Key, Greer, and Knoxville are fantastic. This is the first time I've seen Calum Worthy who plays their "TV son" Zack, and he is great. And who doesn't love Paul Reiser? C'mon.

But the first thing that really hit me right was the production. This show is beautiful to look at. Top quality filming.

Then in episode 2, they brought in Fred Malamed, George Wyner, and Rose Abdoo and I fell in love with them instantly. I could watch them all day. Then Bob Clendinen from Cougar Town, in the same episode!

Well, I'm a sucker for a great cast. It's frustrating to me that Keegan Michael Key is the more serious character and straight man, because he's one of the funniest people alive. But I love shows about friends working through things together, and I love this show. I hope it is on for a while.
38 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dashcam (I) (2021)
8/10
HILARIOUS
23 July 2022
I read 100 reviews of this and they all hate Annie.

Yes, Annie is an atrocious person who runs around ruining everyone's life, Yes, Annie's character is a MAGA and is as obnoxious as possible.

But she's FUNNY. She's extremely entertaining because she is a funny idiot and a terrible person. It's kind of like how It's Always Sunny is about atrocious, disastrous people who are hilarious.

Her performance is worth a watch if you recognize her for what she is, a social clown, a disaster on two legs, a chaos agent.

Dare I call it cutting-edge comedy? Yes, I do so dare.
18 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
X (II) (2022)
6/10
Ti West does a backwoods slasher
20 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This movie reminded me a lot of Rob Zombie's House movie 31, but just the first 15 minutes or so. Because the characters are a good natured crew of 70's road-tripping performers, that kind of are friends and kind of not.

In a way, this like a Rob Zombie movie that replaces the awful Rob Zombie dialogue with boring dialogue.

And of course, Rob Zombie has been remaking Texas Chainsaw Massacre little by little across his movies, and this movie, very authentically filmed in Texas, has several little references to TCM, and like TCM, it has a lot of heart and unusual villains that are human but are very far gone from normalcy.

So this movie is like if you replaced the murderous family from TCM with the murderous grandparents from The Visit.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Memoria (I) (2021)
1/10
Hold on to yer butts, Tilda is UNLEASHED!!!!
4 June 2022
Tilda Swinton produced this vanity project in which she plays a tedious twit, and the movie is also a tedious twit. If I had been involved in making this movie, I would have deleted most of its scenes. For the scenes I left in, I would have made the opposite choices.

If you've seen Get Out, you'll understand what I mean when I say that this movie is the Sunken Place, and that to watch it is to find yourself inexplicably stuck in a chair, in the darkness, as coherence and meaning fall away and you sink into an actual void.

The people who made this movie are my enemies, just as they are the enemies of story. They shrug at the notion of showing scenes or people that an audience could be interested in seeing. They are determined to waste the audience's time with still shots of rooms and of people sitting still. Hell-bent on it.

This is a waiting room of a movie, an interminably long red traffic light. This is standing in line behind a few people at the store and the cashier has left to do something, and minutes go by and just as she may never come back, this movie may never get to a point.

Tilda's Jessica's Tilda isn't the only tedious twit in the movie. Everyone she meets are also tedious twits. You would never want to meet these people and you would definitely never want to try to have a conversation with these people. They might want to make you listen to their boring band or tell you some boring poem. You would DEFINITELY never want to meet Jessica Tilda, because she is just going to interrupt what you are doing, stammer after a bit, and draw a line on the ground with her toe as she stares at you and slowly asks you a meaningless question that can not be answered.

Tilda Jessica wastes the time of everyone she meets in this movie, which is ok because none of them are doing anything interesting or useful. They are all dullards covered in lint or dirt. The irony is that by watching her waste everyone's time, she's actually wasting OUR time. There is a scene where she is stuck in a long line of traffic (as I mentioned above, I would have thrown out most of the scenes in this movie). She conveys boredom and frustration. But imagine how the audience feels by this point? This scene is an hour in, and the hour preceding it had even less momentum than this traffic jam.

It seems cruel to be tricked into watching someone sit in traffic. That's the least of the movie's crimes, though. I maintain that there is not a person that exists that wants to stare at a cramped parking lot of cars with their alarms going off for 45 seconds. But that is a scene in this movie, almost right at the beginning. I'm not speaking figuratively. That is an actual scene. It's not even the movie's only scene that is about a car alarm going off.

In fact, this movie starts with a ten minute segment of still images with doodles superimposed over them. Actual doodles. Actually ten minutes.

About an hour and a half in, Jesswinton goes to see a doctor with her mystery malady. Nothing about this doctor or her office would make you think she could help with an unusual problem. But what did surprise me was that when the Doctor made an offhand remark about religion, about a fourth of the audience laughed. Genuine laughter, not forced, as if they were watching Happy Gilmore. And when the conversation just naturally revolved around to Salvador Dali, as conversations with doctors always do, and Twilda suggested that Dali might have taken drugs, the audience erupted in a full-on belly laugh. I looked around in confusion before realizing that I was among freaks.

The plan for this movie is that it would only be shown in theaters, and that is wise, because no one could ever watch this via streaming. One could not possibly stick to watching this movie if they had any other activities within reach. It defies our interest. It defeats our good will.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
13 Cameras (2015)
7/10
Torgo's Revenge
1 January 2022
There are two reviews that I read in my formative years that have stuck in my mind, one for John Fowles' novel The Collector and one for the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Collector review compared the narrator to Caliban, a beast of limited potential and low appeal who desires a lovely young woman with her whole life ahead of her. The tragedy of the character of Caliban, and the Collector, is that they desire someone for whom they have nothing to offer.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre review made a similar comment about the cannibal family, describing Leatherface as "an earth-bound beast", the family as creatures with no potential for growth, creation, or contributing anything good to the world, who are driven to destroy and consume a group of bright young people who are full of potential and promise (maybe not Franklin, but ok).

Then there is Torgo from the cult D movie classic Manos: Hands of Fate, an unfortunate man whose grotesque physicality would necessarily make him a social outcast. He is deeply frustrating to watch. It takes Torgo forever to say anything, to walk from one point to another, or to make a decision.

Neville Archimbault plays Gerald, and Gerald is a character who incorporates all of the things I've mentioned. Like Caliban and the Collector, Gerald is extremely unappealing and not personable. No people skills, no hope of connecting with anyone else intellectually, and extremely off-putting, physically.

But like Caliban and the collector, Gerald wants. And with a physicality and personality that repels others, Gerald's mind has only developed toward finding other ways to connect with people, and those ways are far more familiar to anyone who watches horror films or homicide documentaries.

Like Leatherface, Gerald is an earth-bound beast. Other people are to Gerald as beautiful birds in the sky are to a hungry bear, and all Gerald and the bear want to do is snatch them to the ground.

Like Torgo, every second of Gerald's screen time is excruciating. Neville Archimbault fully commits to portraying Gerald, immersing himself in Gerald's physicality. His Gerald takes forever to walk ten feet, and every step looks painful. He has a blank stare and an always gaping mouth. His whole life is reflected in that blank stare: this is a man who has never had a friend. He answers people with one or two word grunts after long pauses. He is painful for other characters to interact with and painful for us to watch. The characters remark on his awful smell.

It's a committed performance of an impenetrable and lost person that reminds me a little of Lawrence Harvey from Human Centipede 2. Archimbault should be proud.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Titane (2021)
1/10
French cinema at it's most stupid
9 October 2021
Every scene of this movie is the stupidest scene I've ever seen.
29 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
American Horror Stories: Game Over (2021)
Season 1, Episode 7
1/10
So bad.
7 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
American Horror Stories is basically a YA fanfic version of the show, which is already pretty much fluff most of the time anyway once each season just turns into all the characters being dead and ghosts and friends. "Stories" started out with a garbage 2 parter about a snotty teen who somehow becomes a badass killer, and this final episode returns to her and her story.

The Rubberman spirit and suit aren't there to help some rich teenage girl become a superhero. It also doesn't generally leave the house, let alone let someone drive away with it to go have fun. And the idea that it does that here is not scary at all.

It's wonderful to see Kaia Gerber, even if her character is nonsense. All of her scenes are repetitive. Sierra McCormick on the other hand with her phony smile and already dated everything is a real chore to watch. This episode introduces a boy and his mom and the boy is even worse than Sierra and her character.

Hey kids! With enough plot armor you too can be a millionaire assassin! Murder like a girlboss!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
At what point did they know this was going to be so bad?
26 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
First, the positives: This is a state of the art movie. The technical talent who brought this universe to vivid life are the very best. The visuals are stunning. Beautiful aliens from beautiful worlds teem throughout this film.

The bad: This is one of those movies that makes you wonder; At what point did the filmmakers realize how bad it was going to be? Did they know from the beginning and just not care? Maybe halfway through the making? Who knows. But this movie is a two and a quarter hour dumpster fire and there is no way they couldn't have known it.

How could such a visual marvel be so bad? The story is very cliche and typical of this kind of science fiction, but that's OK. Many enjoyable movies have been made about stories like this. The story isn't the problem.

I'm not the first to say that the leads are horribly miscast. In fact, I can't think of worse choices to play them. Dane DeHaan's screen presence is too much of a kid to be believable as either a romantic lead or an action figure. And I don't know what the deal with his voice is, but he sounds like a 14 year old who's trying to sound like an adult. I cant recall if this is what he sounded like in other things I've seen him in, but he is very annoying to listen to. I doubt that it's his fault they wrote his character to be so smartassy, but he's not cool enough to pull off the wisecracks and not just seem like a little a-hole. It's not funny when he says something like "well then you better go get daddy" to an alien. It's just annoying. It really doesn't help that he's supposed to be a "Major". He could play a Major's SON, maybe, or nephew or something, but every time they refer to him as a Major, or as being in the military at all, it just comes off as ridiculous. He's more of a Shia LaBoeuf in Crystal Skull.

And then there's Cara Delevigne as Lauraline. From the very beginning, she looks like she hates being in this movie. She RADIATES hate. It couldn't be more obvious that she is just wandering around bored in front of a green screen, and she's the only character that reminds me that that is what this movie is. Like Valerian, her Lauraline is very smartassy, and as with Valerian, it is annoying rather than funny. She is an a-hole to EVERYONE, and literally rolls her eyes several times when she has to have conversations with other characters. I don't think that was acting, I think she just wanted to be anywhere else. Also, like Valerian, it is impossible to believe her as a technical genius who serves in a military. Most of her scenes seem unnecessary, and their scenes together really feel forced into a movie that could have made a lot more sense without them.

In their first scene together, the dialogue is absolutely baffling. DeHaan just dumps his own character description in a Sorkin style walk-and-talk, and it is this bad: "Sure I'm a charming rule-breaking maverick, and sure you're a smart gal who tales her job seriously and doesn't want to get involved with a guy like me, but I just want to get in that butt, and maybe, just maybe, over the course of this movie you'll warm up to me, even though I have been with SO MANY other women lol" (which is extremely far fetched right off the bat).

This scene is so bad. Not only because it is just an obvious and clumsy exposition dump, because in a 2 and a quarter hour movie I guess they didn't think they had time to establish these characters in any way other than to just have them literally read their descriptions out loud... It is also so bad because these two characters, as played by these actors, have absolutely no chemistry. It is IMPOSSIBLE to imagine these two humans getting together. I could see either one of them getting together with any of the aliens or robots in this movie before I could see them even being attracted to each other at all. They have no rapport.

DeHaan has made his career by playing preyed-upon twinks, and Delevigne is more of a gal's gal, and that is fine. Everyone deserves to be who they are. If the filmmakers had been a little more clever and daring, they might have had Valerian be a young woman, and maybe Delevigne would have been more engaged? Or had they made Lauraline's character a young man, then maybe we could believe Dehaan's Valerian being so attracted to him.

There is a scene that is either the Filmmakers acknowledging this miscasting or an example of their complete lack of awareness of it. Valerian disarms a guard and actually says the line "Now take your gun and put it into my holster". This is immediately followed by Valerian walking down a bustling street where he is accosted by a succession of exotic female prostitutes who proposition him, one after another. Each time, his reaction is one of genuine revulsion.

I'm just saying. You can't put Dane Dehaan in that scene and not have it look like exactly what it is.

In addition to the terrible misfire in casting the leads, there is some really bad editing. Lots of lines are ADR'ed, which is never good, and for some odd reason, there are numerous times where they cut to Delevigne just so she can say "OK" to something. In addition to the jarring ADR, it's a lot of unnecessary cuts.

At least it has a happy ending though. I always like that.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The problem is not what people say it is.
23 April 2020
I've read 30+ reviews here and all of them say that Kerry Washington's performance is the worst part of the show, which really surprised me. The problem isn't Washington. The problem is the terrible script. The script is so bad and dumb that I'm surprised that two talented actresses like Witherspoon and Washington didn't demand rewrites. The dialogue is obtuse and obvious. Their characters are caricatures. This is as bad as one of the lesser Lifetime productions, before they got their act together. It's not their performances that are the problem. It's not the story, which could have been done well. The script, including personal notes and direction, sounds like a first draft and it seems like nobody did any quality control.
123 out of 156 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3 from Hell (2019)
8/10
Not the Bloodbath we expected. A Gentler, more mellow Zombie effort
18 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was a lot different than I expected. The tone, overall, is a lot more subdued then House of 1,000 Corpses or Devil's Rejects. This movie does continue the story of the Firefly family, but not really, because the plot basically repeats the outline of Devil's Rejects: They're on the run, they hole up and terrorize a family (and then kill them), they go somewhere to party, they get ratted on, there's a battle, they kill their pursuers, they drive away. What the movie really is, is paying a visit to some great characters we haven't seen in a while. It gives them a new life, it gives Otis the start of his endgame as he starts to feel his age, it gives Baby a new soul, and it gives them new family in the form of half-brother Winslow Coltrane. Though it repeats story beats from Devil's Rejects, it's still a different movie. 3 From Hell is quieter, more mellow, and the characters are a little less intense (except Sheri as Baby, who is next level). Otis, who in the previous films was the engine that drove the murderous family, really is tired and ready to settle down. His overt malevolence is largely replaced with more of a sense of fatigue. Even when basically duplicating his hotel room massacre from Devil's Rejects, Otis is just going through the motions (the character, not the actor). Richard Brake, one of the scariest (but somehow extremely charming) actors in film is not as maniacal as I had expected he'd be. His character Winslow is really rather amiable. We know that Otis and Baby are sad about losing their brothers Tiny and Rufus, so once Brake's Winslow was introduced, I was hoping to see some good bonding and character development. That gets skimmed over pretty quickly. I really wanted to get more Winslow in general, including his backstory. In a lot of RZ's movies, he brings in great character actors and gives them a chance to shine, but just as often they only show up for a couple of minutes a piece. Sid Haig and Danny Trejo both get very little screen time this time. I was excited for both of them, but Sid's scene in the beginning is basically what you see on the trailer. I think that his interview should have been longer. At least he got a scene of his own, though. The brevity of Danny Trejo's appearance, and not giving his character Rondo anything to do, is unforgivable. And then there's Clint Howard. I have never seen such a waste of a perfectly good Clint Howard. Clint Howard as a clown in a Rob Zombie movie basically writes itself, but no one remembered to write it. Clint Howard's appearance as a clown who took a wrong turn occurs in the middle of a larger scene that also doesn't work, the home hostage scene. This scene that I've mentioned before is really just a rerun of the motel scene in Devil's Rejects. That scene only worked once. I know the goal was to coerce the warden into sneaking Baby out of prison, but it was redundant and unsurprising, and given the change in Otis's demeanor, it didn't really fit. I wish they'd gone a different route for coercing the warden, Jeff Daniel Phillips, another actor whose character I wanted to see more of. The part of the movie that worked the best and is its saving grace was Sheri Moon Zombie's performance as Baby. She's wonderful in the first two movies, but in this one she is next-level amazing, so far out there that she seems more like a hallucinatory CGI effect in human form. She brings an amazing energy to this film. In House of 1000 Corpses, everyone was amazing, and overall Sid Haig stole the show. In Devil's Rejects it was Bill Moseley as Otis who lit up the screen and you couldn't take your eyes off of him. Here in 3 From Hell, it's Sheri as Baby who brings the fireworks. This really is her movie.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Castle Rock (2018–2019)
1/10
Intolerable.
18 August 2019
I believe "Intolerable" is the best description of this show's first season. It is inept at what it tries to do, which is clearly to imitate the multiple timeline wizardry of shows like Westworld.

A series that takes on Castle Rock and the various story threads of Stephen King stories is a great idea. There are so many characters and so much story potential to be had there, and this series shies away from that. Instead, the writers seem to be trying to create their own trippy story inside of a Stephen King book cover. They wanted to do a Westworld or a Primer, but they do it in such a boring and drawn out way that is it not interesting or entertaining.

Keeping the viewer in the dark from the start is usually a mistake. Establish your baseline first, then get weird with it. Also, you can keep the viewer in the dark, and you can be slow moving, but you can't do both. If you have time to move along very slowly, then you have time to be clear. Being extremely evasive as to what's going on is a fine way to tell a story, but not if that is the point of the whole thing.

There also isn't much of an effort to depict the town or bring it to life. It could be anywhere with snow.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed