Change Your Image
AryanMZ13
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againReviews
The Mauritanian (2021)
The real face of America!!!
The Mauritanian is by no means a film that wants to move in the line of art. The film is quite a typical Hollywood work, the film is technically strong and very acceptable and has respectable acting.
The film is very fast, strong and ready and knows its way from the beginning and is not a modern gambler (how good!). The plan works according to the plan of the calculated film; The location of the camera and the size of the scenes are carefully and very cleverly chosen and do not chant the film (maybe only until the end of the film).
I do not want to talk about the Mauritanian subject because everything is very clear, it is important to turn the subject into a form that is done correctly. Maybe I should just say that America has lost its hand and is no longer the face of democracy, and I think it never was. Prosecution of innocent people, torture to get confess from innocent people, atomic bombing of Japan!, invasion of Iraq because the United States THINKS Saddam has weapons of mass destruction !?, invasion of Afghanistan and leaving after 20 years without No change in Afghanistan. Do you want me to tell more? (and by the way there is a lot more...).
The Mauritanian is not a bad movie...
Score : 2/4.
The Fallout (2021)
For the first feature film? Excellent!
The Fallout appears very simple but powerful, and although the clichéd and repetitive story of psychological trauma is discussed and how it is filmed, the film does not engage in modern vulgarity.
The Fallout is simple, but fast and efficient, it does not waste anything, it does not leave any feeling behind and it does not take time. The story is simple and clear, this is the best thing. The play of the actors is in the face and not in the dialogue, and this is something that we do not have in this disappointing postmodern period in cinema. The director of our film knows the cinema and does not cheat, the director is honest both with us and with herself and how unattainable this is in this age!
The film refreshed me, except for a few places where the camera did very poorly, no technical problems can be taken from the film. The size of the frames is right, absolutely right. This novice director of ours has learned her homework well and it is an honor to have such a film in 2021. This kinds of films give hope to the downward cinema and to us as art and cinema lovers.
The Fallout is a healthy movie. And that is enough.
Score : 1.5/4.
Verdens verste menneske (2021)
Irregularity and irrationality and numbness and vulgarity!!!
This movie with this very useful and appropriate name (which is the only true thing about this movie is its name and its exact coordination with the movie!) Is the first movie I see from this director.
Honestly, before watching the film, I had a completely different mentality from the film and I was expecting an engaging effect in terms of story and tolerable form, but unfortunately, after 40 minutes of enduring and getting nervous and biting my tongue! I could no longer stand this non-artistic, postmodern, and quasi-enlightened creature, and that is the end!!!
The film can not properly transform and show the most basic cinematic scenes, and even worse, meaningless and unreal human communication, where do these people live? I do not think they are in this world.
The film has no story. The film does not have a script. That is all. A sequence starts and for a few seconds nothing happens, then we hear a few meaningless dialogues (which require no action) and then they fight. Then they are happy. Next... what? What happened? How did the viewer convey to me when the director does not give us a past and does not create any space for us? What feeling does he want to convey to us? What element makes the film happen in Norway, I did not saw any Norway and I do not understand the relationship between the country and the characters, what does this mean? It means there is no space.
Unfortunately, I think the film could have been very engaging and serious, but unfortunately nothing happened.
Score : 0/4.
Ghahreman (2021)
Farhadi's worst work, like the rest of his films!
I never liked Farhadi's works because in my opinion he does not understand cinema and art and has done nothing but chanting slogans (which has no place in art and cinema) during the several years he has been making films.
Farhadi does not know (he knows) that his camera is completely wrong for the space he makes in the film, but this is also his non-artistic ingenuity because he does not know how to make Mise-en-scène and space, and therefore from the vulgar camera on his hands and face He uses his shoulder to show us nothing. Farhadi censors everything, because he has neither a script nor a director. In these few years, Farhadi has neither dialogue nor emotion nor personality, his films are repetitions backwards, not repetitions right and good forwards. Farhadi is against his characters and has a long-standing enmity with them, as if his father had been killed by them.
In Farhadi's films, there is no such thing as space and character, the existence of everything is cardboard. And this is just the beginning. Farhadi in this film is completely anti-hero, for example While I was watching the movie, and of course I had to put up with it and watch the movie until the end, I thought to myself, nothing feels like why the characters are not so tangible for me. From the beginning to the end of the film, it was like a film trap for me, with a novice director having the effect of postmodern vulgarity.
Farhadi proved with the hero that he has nothing new to offer and has not learned anything new in these few years. With the hero, it was proved to me that Farhadi cares only for one thing, and that is useless and symbolic awards such as Oscars, Cannes and Golden Globes.
Score: Worthless.
Scenes from a Marriage (2021)
Interrupted scenes!
The mini-series "Scenes from a Marriage" can not only replace the great Bergman's work for us; It can not even create a sensory effect for the viewer as an independent effect.
The main problem of the series is the lack of knowledge and slight characterization of the 5 parts (Episodes) of the series, we do not know the characters and we will not know them until the 5th part (Episode). And the interesting thing is that the creators also know this and do not know how to create the necessary balance for the characters for us so that we do not support either Jonathan or Mira. So basically our conflict is with the script. It works very regularly in terms of technique and form of the series, and we do not have the postmodern wasteful work here, which makes the series viewable, but when there is no material to transfer the basic technique of the series to it, it is not a sensory result. I'm surprised that people give this series 10 out of 10. Have these people seen Ingmar Bergman "Scenes from a Marriage"? (Is it comparable at all !?)
Today, the modern world has shown that it is far, far behind the world of classical art, and knows neither man nor the human problem as much as in the past.
Score : 0.5 / 4.