Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
The Gingerdead man?????hhhhmmmmmmmmmm
16 March 2006
OK I wont go over old ground whats been mentioned in the previous review of this film, so here goes.The film had three good things going for it.Number 1 the background instrumental was quite good, number 2 the idea i believe (please correct me if I'm wrong)although similar is original, and lastly luckily for me, the length of the film (around 70min).Oh and sorry a 4th, the gingerdead man was amusing. Now for the bad, the film was terrible, the dialogue stank, the acting apart from Gary Busey was lousy.There was very little gore and was completely unscary, cant even call it a horror??Apart from this and the clincher, the film was so boring i cant believe i watched the whole thing. To give this film any more than a 2 out of 10 would be madness, don't waste your time with it!!!!!!!!!!!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A very overrated film
14 March 2006
After reading about this notorious film i finally managed to get my hands on it.In some ways it lived up to my expectations but in several ways it did not.The female acting was good, male acting was bad, the sound was bad but the music was superb and spooky.Although still quite disturbing and gripping the violence displayed was quite poor and very overrated, and without giving anything away the supposed real footage at the end, wasn't worth waiting for (one reviewer even suggested that the footage was fake, surprise, surprise!!!)I'm glad I've seen it, just to say so but its not by far one of the most disturbing films I've seen..............unfortunately.........if it did not have the end footage to sell the film i would say stay well clear nothing new, but the fact that the film makers added this, give it a go. Fans of gore sites on the net will watch this film and think...and?????????????
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed