Proof of Life (2000)
1/10
Not very good.
25 July 2001
I saw this on an airplane today, and while I understand this isn't the

best way to view a film, it didn't really work for me. The plot is

fairly straight forward stuff, nothing surprising there- although there

did seem to be some missed opportunities, especially when you look at a

superb film like "Missing"- so much more could have been made of the

politics involved, which would have ratcheted up the tension a mite. The

acting was okay, but unlike the other reviewers here I thought the best

actor in it was David Morse. I believed every single thing he did, and

he had a lot of tough stuff to do. He's a very good actor. Russell Crowe

seemed to be acting tough, which he does fine, but I found nothing

special in it. The big disappointment for me was Meg Ryan. Shot as

though she was Barbra Streisand, as if through numerous filters, her

make up was perfect in every single scene. And her face- well, let's

just say she's looking more and more like Michelle Pfeiffer or Goldie

Hawn. Some may say that's not such a bad thing, and it isn't, but I

liked the Meg of old, she was far more expressive and free and alive.

Now she seems to want to be 'aging well' or something, and it's limiting

and dull. Of course, it doesn't help that she had such winning lines as

"Why are you doing this?" - the script is indeed weak. To say nothing of

the fact that she is the helpless and occasionally dangerously stupid

weak female of the piece, just waiting for big strong Russell to 'take

charge' (like a real man always does) and save the poor weepy female.

The movie starts out great, then fades into your average forgettable

film.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed