Does Anybody Bother to Read the Book???
26 January 2003
This is one of the worst movies of 2002. First of all it doesn't even

resemble the book by Robert Ludlum. They made this up as they

went along. It was all special effects and not much else. First and foremost, Matt Damon looked way too young for the part.

He is supposed to be a master spy and he looked like he just

graduated college....ZERO credibility. Then the girls part was a doctor of economics , she was all wet

too. Then they brought in a trio of assassins to get rid of Bourne. What

a waste of talent in Clive Owen who is one of the best new actors

around. Anyone who saw "Second Sight" will attest to his talent .

How cute, they made the "Professor" (his character ) drive a BMW.

After all those commercials he (Owen) did as "The Driver" this was

a "cutesy touch". Next , what ever happened to the character of Carlos? who was an

important part of the story (in the book).

If you want to see a better version of this book rent the TV movie

made in the 80's with Richard Chamberlin. He at least had the

maturity and credibility to play Jason Bourne and Jaclyn Smith was

at least believable as the doctor who becomes first his victim and

later his ally.

She plays Dr.Marie St.Jacques, a Canadian economist whose life

intertwines with that of the spy on the run.

The TV versions also had better location shots. The new version

was so dank and cold and wet all the time it made me want to

have a box of Kleenex ready in case I got a cold.

I can only say that everyone in this film was motivated by one thing,

to quote a great line from Sean Connery's character in the

movie"The Great Train Robbery". When asked why he committed

the crime he replies....

"I did it for the money"....

MY sentiments exactly.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed