Review of Saw

Saw (2004)
3/10
I "saw" crap. Worse acting of 2004 + Stupid. Not even worth a bootleg
1 November 2004
I'm sorry... The story has so many holes in it, it would be easier to list off what wasn't a hole. To top it off the acting was well below average. I mean... is it just me or are some of the scenes plain STUPID!? When the Toronto Star gave it a 1 out of 5 (1 being bad) they were feeling pity I think...

I was actually excited to see this. I should have used my free pass to the Toronto Film Fest instead of wasting the $10 it costs now

The story is decent I guess, but the concept isn't much different than CUBE (at least to me). That being the only good point, add in the fact that at times the acting made it seem like the character was constipated more than in pain and you get the idea that this was more of a joke than a thriller...

I guess with all the remakes Hollywood has been doing, at least this was an attempt at being somewhat original. In Hollywood standards this is also a bit graphic as well... but who said Hollywood was a standard for anything good...

This isn't even worth your bandwidth to download a bootleg....
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed