Killers in the House (1998 TV Movie)
5/10
If ever a need for a Union
6 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER*********** if you do not mind wasting 90 minutes of your life you will never get back. For the rest of you proceed. *******************************************************************

Talk about employee dissatisfaction! Seemingly half of the employees of a small town bank robs it. They get off with the money and take refuge in a mansion who one thinks is deserted. It is not and the rest of the movie is about how the family of 3 that inherited the house survives the night. Again, as in most of these movies the smartest person is young child.. But all of this never would of happened if in the very beginning of the movie a cop who goes to the ATM sees the robbery taking place doesn't do something that is so stupid you wonder why the whole town isn't a haven for criminal activity. Instead of the cop calling 911 for back up he decides to take on the heavily armed bank robbers himself! I was shocked when he said drop your guns and it was only him standing there. Who wrote this movie? It would of made more sense if no one saw them commit the robbery. In any case even if the movie is filled with implausible acts such as a lone senior citizen lawyer(Hal Linden} thinking he was James Bond and taking on the robbers on his own and getting killed it was fairly entertaining and better then half the movies in the theaters today. But just think if the bank itself treated its employees right half of them would not have robbed the place. lol
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed