John Carter (2012)
6/10
Not worth the use of $200 million
20 May 2012
Well now I have seen it, was not sure if I wanted cause of the bad critics, but since it was used $200 million on making it I guess I wanted to support a little.

But since it is in the $200 million category I was expecting a lot better than this. The graphic was a sometimes not that good, easy to see computer animation. The story very bad and acting was mostly like "I do not believe in this myself". So no, it wasn't worth $200 millions. I even caught myself almost falling a sleep sometimes, and that is really bad for a movie in that amount class.

I mean see Battleship or The Avengers, it is in that amount class, but those two beat the crap out of John Carter. The title is also very bad, no one in Europe knows who the hell John Carter is.

And life on mars is just so outdated, that it is amazing Disney didn't even want to make this movie. Life on Mars is boring, because it is not even possible to imagine it because it is so close to us. So the story fell before it was started. Maybe it was cool in the 80' but not in the year 2012.

And when you get a crew that seems to have been more interested in picking up the paycheck than the story...as audience you see that in the movie.

Sorry but being kind I'll give it a 6/10 here.

For that amount of money it should have been much, much better.
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed