I have not read the novel that was originally written by William Faulkner but I feel like the film is done in story telling as a novel more than as a typical movie because of its realistic creation. On the same time its done in a experimental way, its like poetry. It also feels very intimate which is what makes the movie original in how it gives me the viewer a particular feeling. I prefer how the movie is done in its artistically way rather more than how I enjoy it as a movie in its wholeness. This is because I found it hard to sometimes follow the story as I was interrupted by the cinema photography and the very dramatic music/sound. Possibly this is because it's done to show the details in a story rather than as a simple summary of the novel. I therefore perceive that it is done in honorary way to the novel.
What for me destroys it is the most is how the characters are too intimate, this make it for me to not strike it as completely genuine Or maybe it is because it is to real for me the viewer to handle.
What for me destroys it is the most is how the characters are too intimate, this make it for me to not strike it as completely genuine Or maybe it is because it is to real for me the viewer to handle.