Is there some reason why Peter Pan cannot be played by a boy? Here Peter is played by a woman who unfortunately looked and sounded like a woman not even really trying to sound and act like a boy. Why did it have to be live? It would have been much better had they cleaned up the production woes, bad acting, and special effects??? And I believe it was only live in EST anyway (Can you imagine watching this train wreck as a taped production?). Live was a gimmick that ruined this production. I watched the whole thing, but just really felt sorry for the actors and crew by the end. Changing the story doesn't make it an event if that story is boring and unimaginative.
Review of Peter Pan Live!
