It amazes me how we as movie watchers can have such a drastic scale of a movie from 0 to 10.
I totally agree with Steven Harms statement on people rating movies they have not seen.
How in the world can 2 movie critics be so far apart on rating these movies?? There definitely has to be some type of sub-class or other scale to rate these movies. A movie either has good entertainment, good acting, good effects, good story line, good ending, OR NOT.
There are so many personal ratings on IMDb now, it is crazy! One rater comes in at 10 and the other at 0..
I'm assuming it all balances at the end? I have been mislead on more than a few ratings here in regards to my statement on a movie being good or not.
I understand each rater has their own opinion, but honestly this will have to be a quite terrible movie for me to rate it as low as a 5. For me 5 is a bad movie and anything less would be terrible.
I totally agree with Steven Harms statement on people rating movies they have not seen.
How in the world can 2 movie critics be so far apart on rating these movies?? There definitely has to be some type of sub-class or other scale to rate these movies. A movie either has good entertainment, good acting, good effects, good story line, good ending, OR NOT.
There are so many personal ratings on IMDb now, it is crazy! One rater comes in at 10 and the other at 0..
I'm assuming it all balances at the end? I have been mislead on more than a few ratings here in regards to my statement on a movie being good or not.
I understand each rater has their own opinion, but honestly this will have to be a quite terrible movie for me to rate it as low as a 5. For me 5 is a bad movie and anything less would be terrible.