I have played Call of Duty since Modern Warfare came out, and i am not one of the 12 year old kids who wants to sleep with your mother.
In the game you are David Mason, son of Alex Mason (Main protagonist of Black Ops I). Every now and then you are in the 80's as Alex, but in my opinion, is there not enough 80's in the game. In Black Ops I you are playing in 1960's, executing Fidel Castro in the first mission, meeting a old face from World at War, Viktor Reznov. The game had a great storyline, but Black Ops II is a little more flat. It introduced a new thing (You could change the story of the game if you took a couple of shots.
Something about Black Ops I that i loved was the gore and carnage, which provided a much more realistic gameplay, even because it's milder than WaW. Black Ops II had the same feature (Blowing limbs off), but it's much rarer and nearly impossible to do. The bulletwounds are back, but you can't fire on them until the ground is filled with splattered blood.
Thr multiplayer is WAY to noobfriendly. You can handle more shots, something which isn't so fun. The campers have a much greater advantage in the game and the streets are filled with quick-no scopers while the assultrifle guys hide in corners. The maps are even so bad that they have redone Nuketown. Only that it is worse.
I give the game a 4 for the campaign, 1 1/2 for the unique map TranZit, and a half star for the nooby multiplayer.
In the game you are David Mason, son of Alex Mason (Main protagonist of Black Ops I). Every now and then you are in the 80's as Alex, but in my opinion, is there not enough 80's in the game. In Black Ops I you are playing in 1960's, executing Fidel Castro in the first mission, meeting a old face from World at War, Viktor Reznov. The game had a great storyline, but Black Ops II is a little more flat. It introduced a new thing (You could change the story of the game if you took a couple of shots.
Something about Black Ops I that i loved was the gore and carnage, which provided a much more realistic gameplay, even because it's milder than WaW. Black Ops II had the same feature (Blowing limbs off), but it's much rarer and nearly impossible to do. The bulletwounds are back, but you can't fire on them until the ground is filled with splattered blood.
Thr multiplayer is WAY to noobfriendly. You can handle more shots, something which isn't so fun. The campers have a much greater advantage in the game and the streets are filled with quick-no scopers while the assultrifle guys hide in corners. The maps are even so bad that they have redone Nuketown. Only that it is worse.
I give the game a 4 for the campaign, 1 1/2 for the unique map TranZit, and a half star for the nooby multiplayer.