8/10
Flawed, but a great movie nonetheless.
17 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
My childhood was full of obscene movies that don't get recognition. My parents seemed to always bring home movies where if I were to mention them to someone, they'd have no clue what I was talking about. More often than not, the movies would be scary to children who were not used to that type. Thus, I had a varied and interesting movie collection as a child. And my childhood friends would never watch a movie I'd recommend.

This has very few spoilers at the end (the first one is more like a warning to parents and the second one to people with germaphobia than spoilers). I put the word spoiler in front of it, so a reader doesn't accidentally read it and get mad at me.

This movie is based off a book by the same title by George MacDonald, published in 1872. Many people who have read the book don't like the movie adaption because so much was left out, or barely mentioned, and characters personalities are changed immensely. I've read the book, and I still like this movie. I grew up watching it and read the book much later, so maybe that's why I can excuse the watered down adaption. I love both the book and the movie.

Young Princess Irene (pronounced Eye-reen-ee for an unexplained reason; the director was from Hungarian, so maybe that's how it's pronounced there? Just a guess) wanders off from her lady in waiting one day outside the castle, and goes exploring in the nearby woods. Not knowing her way, she gets lost, and is found by a miner's son, Curdie, who warns her about the goblins that could be lurking around in the forest, and leads her back to the palace, becoming friends along the way. When Curdie goes to the mines to work the next day, he slips down a hole that leads him to where the goblins are, deep into the earth, who are concocting a plan against the royal palace.

Magic was a majour theme in the novel, and didn't carry into the adaption. There is a bit about magic that isn't explained well by a character that doesn't have a solid place in the story. It can leave the viewer wondering why it was even added in the first place. I think if the movie was longer and added to the magical aspect and the character, the movie would have been a lot better. The story feels incomplete. Good, but incomplete.

This is pretty dark for a children's movie (as so many of the old ones are). This movie is not rated, so I recommend that, if someone were to show it to children, to watch it beforehand to decide whether or not its appropriate for the children. This movie can haunt children for life.

I'd recommend this movie to a teenager because a lot of teenagers like children movies and darker stories, and this movie infuses the two.

This movie is on YOUTUBE.

*WARNING/SPOILER* to PARENTS There is a very violent battle between the goblins and the humans in the end, which could frighten children. *END warning/spoiler*

To anyone has GERMAPHOBIA or is disgusted easily about bodily functions: *WARNING: The Goblin Prince Froglip picks his nose while in the meeting with his goblin minions, and flicks it into a puddle. I used to be so revolted by that, and I still kinda am, and it grossed me out the first time I saw it. And many times after that. I still cringe at it. *END of warning*

If you watched Princess and the Goblin, and liked it, here are a few other older children movies I'd recommend:

The Troll in Central Park (1994), The Pagemaster (1994), Matilda (1996), Thumbelina (1994), Ferngully (1992, may also scare young chilren), A Little Princess (1995)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed