I feel bad for not giving this a lower score seeing as how it has such a low rating. The movie is about well, a strangler of teenagers and how he, well, strangles them. The biggest fault with this movie is that there's almost no screen time at all devoted to building up the suspense of the killer appearing. We get this dumb subplot about two brothers who feel guilty about stealing or borrowing a bike or they used to be thieves or something like that. I guess the movie was just trying to capture the youth at this time. The credits said 1965, but according to this website, it was 1964.
Who cares? They probably didn't even bother to get the date right! Even for a short movie, it seems to have a lot of padding. Most of these stories don't go anywhere. I guess I will give it a little credit for trying to be realistic. Of course, I didn't grow up at this time. It is kind of amusing to see some of these obnoxious characters and realize how our standards have changed. *1/2
Who cares? They probably didn't even bother to get the date right! Even for a short movie, it seems to have a lot of padding. Most of these stories don't go anywhere. I guess I will give it a little credit for trying to be realistic. Of course, I didn't grow up at this time. It is kind of amusing to see some of these obnoxious characters and realize how our standards have changed. *1/2