I cannot understand that this movie can be listed in the top 250. The movie has a rating average of 4.3 of the top 1000 voters, which is rating for a bottom rated movie.
I've already seen quite some Hindi movies. My conclusion is most Hindi movies are just average quality. Indeed there are exceptions. The movie 'Dangal' is a good (not super as 8.9 on IMDb) I prefer that IMDb would only list the decent movies in their Top 250. Something remarkable in the top250: Almost all recent Hindi movies are starring Aamir Khan. It's an OK actor, but sorry it's not possible that all his movies are Top250 worthily (with exception maybe 'Dangal'.
IMDb should really redefine the factors, which define a movie for the IMDb Top250 movie.
(1) Top 1000 voters should be an important factor (2) Amount of votes (3) Is the movie new or old. (To avoid hype movies, but also introduce classic movies) ++ Movies should earn there place ++, timeless is also important. (4) Last but not least >> Origin of the voter: Example: An Hindi movie rated by an Italian or American, should have a bigger impact, than an Hindi person.
I'm a Dutch speaking guy, where are used to see several movies in other languages than on native language. This also opens our eyes, regarding what makes a movie good or bad.
I can understand that sometimes you are not always objective in your rating. But I would also understand if rating of foreigners would have a higher weight on the movie. This can make people discover new movies in other languages. Japanese/Swedish/German/Spanish/French movies can be really good.
I've already seen quite some Hindi movies. My conclusion is most Hindi movies are just average quality. Indeed there are exceptions. The movie 'Dangal' is a good (not super as 8.9 on IMDb) I prefer that IMDb would only list the decent movies in their Top 250. Something remarkable in the top250: Almost all recent Hindi movies are starring Aamir Khan. It's an OK actor, but sorry it's not possible that all his movies are Top250 worthily (with exception maybe 'Dangal'.
IMDb should really redefine the factors, which define a movie for the IMDb Top250 movie.
(1) Top 1000 voters should be an important factor (2) Amount of votes (3) Is the movie new or old. (To avoid hype movies, but also introduce classic movies) ++ Movies should earn there place ++, timeless is also important. (4) Last but not least >> Origin of the voter: Example: An Hindi movie rated by an Italian or American, should have a bigger impact, than an Hindi person.
I'm a Dutch speaking guy, where are used to see several movies in other languages than on native language. This also opens our eyes, regarding what makes a movie good or bad.
I can understand that sometimes you are not always objective in your rating. But I would also understand if rating of foreigners would have a higher weight on the movie. This can make people discover new movies in other languages. Japanese/Swedish/German/Spanish/French movies can be really good.