Obviously the first one will always be the best. Let's not forget that the first two were based on facts from Carlton Leach's involvement with Pat Tate etc. Now it seems as if Pat Tate is a fictional character. In the third and fourth installment there are very small elements that resemble something he may have done but they are both so very far from the truth, almost a complete work of fiction. However if you switch off from the fact that this is supposed to be a real person based on facts and take it as just a UK gangster film, I don't think it's too bad. It's actually quite funny in places too and certainly not a boring film by any means.
