I can't give this a bad review. The history channel covers everything - including now, the Nostradamus effect. I believe the history channel does a solid job of presenting things in a non-biased way. As with most of HC pieces, there are several points of view - those that sway for and against the concept.
I don't really understand why anyone would vote negatively against this. Just we history channel covers the Big Bang, economics, social order, evolution, religion - this is approached in the same vain.
Yes, the narrator is adamant about the story line, but it's honoring the beliefs of those who believe in and have built up Nostradamus. Which I'm certain is the intention - giving a voice to those who believe be in this.
We all have a right to disagree with this, but that doesn't make it "bad". It's the history channel and they're going to cover things you do or don't believe in.
Again - can't understand the negative reviews. It's an expose of Nostradamus but that doesn't make it bad. The point is that this is controversial- what else would you expect?
I don't really understand why anyone would vote negatively against this. Just we history channel covers the Big Bang, economics, social order, evolution, religion - this is approached in the same vain.
Yes, the narrator is adamant about the story line, but it's honoring the beliefs of those who believe in and have built up Nostradamus. Which I'm certain is the intention - giving a voice to those who believe be in this.
We all have a right to disagree with this, but that doesn't make it "bad". It's the history channel and they're going to cover things you do or don't believe in.
Again - can't understand the negative reviews. It's an expose of Nostradamus but that doesn't make it bad. The point is that this is controversial- what else would you expect?