It doesn't really have a story and it's not trying it either. It's basically wanting to show how one can make audience feel disgusted and act like it's so intellectually thought provoking, while it truly isn't. It even won awards for that which proves how low IQ the reviewers were. Anyone can make these kind of movies and weave a philosophical, psychological turn of events it can be claiming it as art.
It's a smart way of filmmaking to make you feel disgusting, self question but it's pretentious, deliberate, and false filmmaking. Award committee fell for it treating it as great film as such. It's not. Anyone can do these kind of movies. Just be incoherent, pointless, conflicting your nihilistic realistic ideas and tada. It's like after you went for a party and puked the next day, that puke is given to you claiming it's a new drink. That's what this movie is and trying to present it like look we found something unique, new form of art. That's the whole thing of this movie goal was.
It's a smart way of filmmaking to make you feel disgusting, self question but it's pretentious, deliberate, and false filmmaking. Award committee fell for it treating it as great film as such. It's not. Anyone can do these kind of movies. Just be incoherent, pointless, conflicting your nihilistic realistic ideas and tada. It's like after you went for a party and puked the next day, that puke is given to you claiming it's a new drink. That's what this movie is and trying to present it like look we found something unique, new form of art. That's the whole thing of this movie goal was.