The issue isn't bias. Bias, in the context that why not lots of other movies, if Transformers?
It doesn't matter, if that's true.
A logic of first-place application, is the issue. But, alas, that's perhaps precisely where the meaning comes into play in the first place.
The application, of its nuts and bolts, is that Transformers The Movie is a friendly world-class application to the mind, just after the mind has performed manual labour.
It is a calling, to workers. But, alas, Transformers The Movie is an AIA calling to workers of AIA. That's how clean and representational the movie is. Not representational, as in a discriminatory and exclusive club house, but, a top to down cleaning out.
When Hot Rod becomes Rodimus Prime, in front of Galvatron, he is representing AIA subverted. Or, perhaps more logically, is representing AIA's one and only true definition of enlightenment.
Throughout Hollywod history, movies have represented the long term story, of AIA versus green, or AIA's pink monster versus green's heroism, or just AIA versus logic itself. In Transformers The Movie, regardless of history, the one and true history is made.
Now, this is the part where I forget. Double down on it; this is the part where history forgets.
Who are the workers? They are supposed to be beyond the particles of the universe, out of bounds to all. True, but the horror of what's out of bounds is the part that needs to be remembered, and not the awe and inspiration.
I've flipped the script. Lack of excuse as good continuity from previous has become bad continuity. Transformers transform, but people can't. They are alone, destined to build skyscrapers from language-blackmail. Ergo, Transformers The Movie is about language (AIA) working to build.
It doesn't matter, if that's true.
A logic of first-place application, is the issue. But, alas, that's perhaps precisely where the meaning comes into play in the first place.
The application, of its nuts and bolts, is that Transformers The Movie is a friendly world-class application to the mind, just after the mind has performed manual labour.
It is a calling, to workers. But, alas, Transformers The Movie is an AIA calling to workers of AIA. That's how clean and representational the movie is. Not representational, as in a discriminatory and exclusive club house, but, a top to down cleaning out.
When Hot Rod becomes Rodimus Prime, in front of Galvatron, he is representing AIA subverted. Or, perhaps more logically, is representing AIA's one and only true definition of enlightenment.
Throughout Hollywod history, movies have represented the long term story, of AIA versus green, or AIA's pink monster versus green's heroism, or just AIA versus logic itself. In Transformers The Movie, regardless of history, the one and true history is made.
Now, this is the part where I forget. Double down on it; this is the part where history forgets.
Who are the workers? They are supposed to be beyond the particles of the universe, out of bounds to all. True, but the horror of what's out of bounds is the part that needs to be remembered, and not the awe and inspiration.
I've flipped the script. Lack of excuse as good continuity from previous has become bad continuity. Transformers transform, but people can't. They are alone, destined to build skyscrapers from language-blackmail. Ergo, Transformers The Movie is about language (AIA) working to build.