As a horror movie it does not qualify as some sites or the poster say, but the truth is that it seemed like a good thriller to me since I feel that it has originality. The production on the other hand is low compared to the other Barker films that came later since this is more of a B movie and apparently this is the only B movie in Clive Barker's filmography since the production and the makeup don't look as professional as the other movies, but hey, Clive was just getting into the movie industry and sometimes you always start small. No wonder there are people who didn't like it, but I can't say it's Clive Barker's worst movie because even though it was a flat start for him, at least I found the story enjoyable. My grade for this movie is 8/10 because I think it's one of those B-movies that can be curious and weird, but enjoyable depending on how you see it.
Review of Underworld
