How can a reviewer write 600 words on this mess of a movie?
A slasher movie needs to have certain things to make it in the genre such as:
1. Tits! Yep, plenty of visuals there. From the opening scene gravity and skin interact. I might add that Ms Raycene more than contributes in that area
2. Bums! Yep, plenty of visuals there as well. Bouncing bums aplenty.
3. Acting? This movie has such little competent thespian qualities that Ms Raycene almost hits the mark. I said almost because the final scenes end in an incoherent bloody mess.
4. Plot? Well there is a plot but it's gossamer thin and in the end the director lost control of the movie.
I really need to watch again to work out the plot but life is too short and watching this mess is just painful.
So how to you rate a movie like this? Well, it gets one point for the tits and bums and another point for the copious amounts of (fake) blood.
Oh what the hell, I'll give it another point for Ms Raycene's bust.
I'm giving it a generous 3/10 and I want my wasted time back!
A slasher movie needs to have certain things to make it in the genre such as:
1. Tits! Yep, plenty of visuals there. From the opening scene gravity and skin interact. I might add that Ms Raycene more than contributes in that area
2. Bums! Yep, plenty of visuals there as well. Bouncing bums aplenty.
3. Acting? This movie has such little competent thespian qualities that Ms Raycene almost hits the mark. I said almost because the final scenes end in an incoherent bloody mess.
4. Plot? Well there is a plot but it's gossamer thin and in the end the director lost control of the movie.
I really need to watch again to work out the plot but life is too short and watching this mess is just painful.
So how to you rate a movie like this? Well, it gets one point for the tits and bums and another point for the copious amounts of (fake) blood.
Oh what the hell, I'll give it another point for Ms Raycene's bust.
I'm giving it a generous 3/10 and I want my wasted time back!