Diabolically awful.
I'm not sure if there was really any point to this film other than to have an excuse to have some actresses briefly appear topless. I have a feeling that at the time this was made it was necessary to add a gloss of seriousness to "excuse" the nudity. So, we have all this unconvincing mallarkey about a sect -- note NOT a cult -- in order to divert the censors' attention from the bare breasts.
I can't imagine there being any reason to watch this now, in the 21st century, other than to wonder at how constrained filmmakers were in the late 20th century. Or perhaps to see Suzanna Leigh playing the role of Paddy Lynch?
I'm not sure if there was really any point to this film other than to have an excuse to have some actresses briefly appear topless. I have a feeling that at the time this was made it was necessary to add a gloss of seriousness to "excuse" the nudity. So, we have all this unconvincing mallarkey about a sect -- note NOT a cult -- in order to divert the censors' attention from the bare breasts.
I can't imagine there being any reason to watch this now, in the 21st century, other than to wonder at how constrained filmmakers were in the late 20th century. Or perhaps to see Suzanna Leigh playing the role of Paddy Lynch?