(1985)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Manhattan – Thursday, January 19, 1984
ackstasis30 September 2008
A few minutes afterwards, I don't dislike 'Battery Film (1985)' as much as I did while watching it. It think that experimental films, by their very nature, raise complex expectations from viewers that they can rarely satisfy. Throughout the whole film, I was constantly searching for some thread of coherency in its structure, for any possible reason why the filmmakers were mixing still-shots of Manhattan with crude animated reconstructions of the landscape. I was looking so hard that I couldn't appreciate the sheer peacefulness of every wintry cityscape, the disquieting calm of America's greatest metropolis, devoid of all human habitation and left, instead, with the tranquil trees and stone war memorials. The film was directed by Franklin Backus and Richard Protovin, and was the third in a trilogy – after 'Manhattan Quartet (1982)' and 'Southern Images (1983)' – that explored New York at a different time and day, though always without any glimpse of people. 'Battery Film,' according to the final title, was filmed on Thursday, January 19, 1984.

An experimental film like this might have worked very well, if it weren't for the animation that frequently breaks up the serene images of calm and isolation. Comprised of crudely-constructed dots and dashes, which shift sequentially to simulate the formation of these Manhattan landscapes, this animation would certainly have been time-consuming; however, it also looks very cheap and crude, and, more than anything else, succeeded in giving me a throbbing headache. The vaguely-Oriental music is very appropriate for the images, and was composed and performed by Asian-American violinist Jason Kao Hwang. At nine minutes in length, 'Battery Film' feels like about fifteen minutes, probably because I spent most of the time trying to work out what point the filmmakers were trying to get across. Among the New York landmarks featured in the film are Battery Park, the World Trade Centre twin towers, and the East Coast War Memorial. Overall, this film is worth watching for those who know what to expect, and you'll receive the most enjoyment if you just try to immerse yourself in the serenity of it all.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aside from a few sad views of the Twin Towers, it's an art film that the average person might never even see.
planktonrules17 July 2011
This is the newest film from the 4-DVD set "Treasures From American Film Archives" and is an art film set in Battery Park--a park at the bottom of Manhattan--not far from the old Twin Towers that were destroyed on 9/11. In fact, through the course of the film you see the towers and it makes for a sad backdrop for the film. Much of it consists of very simple black & white animation as well as photographs--all accompanied by rather discordant flute music. While it's certainly not the sort of film the average person would enjoy, there is a rather interesting artistry to it. Plus, it's rather evocative seeing any place in New York completely devoid of people! How did they arrange that?! I cannot give a score to this film, as it's not a typical sort of film but an art film not intended for mass consumption. Interesting but not particularly enjoyable.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad Student Film
boblipton18 October 2002
This is one of the pieces included in the "Treasures of American Film Archives" DVD set. Although it makes the claim, it cannot honestly be called a movie. It is a series of still pictures shot on a winter day at the Battery on lower Manhattan, doubtless intended to evoke some emotion. If it was the intention of the creators of this film to evoke the emotions of puzzlement and boredom, then they have certainly succeeded. This goes on for eight minutes -- nine if you count the minute of credits.

Apparently the creators of this film were so taken with the idea that they did two more like it.

A hint for film makers who are interested in their audience: a movie is not a series of still images. This stuff was boring in the 19th century, when James White used to go around the world photographing the backs of peoples' hats. One would think that in ninety years, aspiring film makers would have learned this lesson. Obviously, they have not. Still, one would expect the knowledgeable people who select the "Treasures of American Film" to know better. Apparently, they do not either. A pity.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed