Tiptoes (2002) Poster

(2002)

User Reviews

Review this title
108 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Um....Ah....Well, I Don't Know.....Hmmmm....... --or-- Searching for Gary Oldman.......
underfire3517 July 2005
TIPTOES is a film that attempts to deal with the largely unexplored subject of dwarfism, but quickly becomes convoluted and saccharine. The story is centered around Steven (Matthew McConaughey) who has been told by his fiancée Carol (Kate Beckinsale), that she is pregnant. What he has not told her, is that his twin brother, as well as his whole family are dwarfs, and that their child will more than likely be a "little person." We meet Steven's brother, Rolfe (Gary Oldman), who prompts Carol to discover more about what this means and in the process discovers important things about herself as well, etc. She becomes involved with an organization (modeled after the Little People of America, or LPA, group) whose aim is to promote understanding in the world at large. There is also a subplot involving Rolfe's friend Maurice (Peter Dinklage) and his relationship to Lucy, a "normal sized" woman (Patricia Arquette). Maurice is something of an anarchist, who rejects the politically correct nature of the "little person" label (as does Dinklage), has extreme views of the government, and drinks too much. He is one of the most interesting characters in TIPTOES, but is given little screen time and becomes more of a figurehead for the "little people are just people" subtext of the story (Dinklage would be given much more to work with in THE STATION AGENT). As the film progresses, the relationship between Steven and Carol becomes more melodramatic, and in the the end very little is resolved.

TIPTOES, as a film, seems to be more interested in delivering a warm-hearted message than creating a cohesive story. The film presupposes that the audience has a very narrow view of dwarfs: that they don't lead happy productive lives, that they aren't promiscuous or enjoy parties or drink to excess. All the "little people" in TIPTOES become exaggerated in order to dispel these notions, and are rarely given the opportunity to be simply characters in the story. The "normal sized" characters suffer from underdevelopment however and both McConaughey and Beckingsale fail to register as they are put through the motions of the uneven plot. TIPTOES rarely shows the prejudice that it constantly refers to. Observe the scene, when renting a motel room to Rolfe, Maurice and Lucy, the man behind the counter makes the comment "one adult and two children." No response is made by any of the characters, which seems unlikely considering Maurice is a gun-toting malcontent. The term "midget" is referenced as a derogatory epitaph, but little explanation is given (the word is a holdover from the "freak show" era). TIPTOES decides to sidestep many of these issues with well intentioned portrayals of normality, but generates little enlightenment into the specific social experience of dwarfs. Furthermore, the film fails to find the right tone for the material, going from bouncy to lachrymose in brief intervals; the subtext of Carol's pregnancy is also unsettling. The word 'abortion' is never used, but the capsulated plot detail on the packaging states that after she finds out her child will be a dwarf "Carol decides to have the baby anyway..." This line is used in a fluffy quasi-charming context and would be unthinkable to print if the unborn child was mentally handicapped or paralyzed.

Matthew Bright, the director of TIPTOES, has seemingly carved out a niche for himself by making odd-ball low budget films that have become cult favorites. Both THE FORBIDDEN ZONE, which he wrote, and FREEWAY, wrote/directed, have gone on to find a small, but faithful, audience on the fringe of modern film. The fact that the end result of TIPTOES was a soapy, romantic drama was apparently against Bright's wishes and he claims that the producers marginalized his input as the production went on. He went so far as publicly shun the finished film at the Sundance Festival. Even so, Bright is not a director whose work I would have sought out intentionally, but I was drawn to TIPTOES by the glimmering lure of Gary Oldman. Not only that, but Gary Oldman playing a "little person." After viewing the film, I am uncertain of what his motivations for choosing this film might have been. It could have been for the complicated technical aspects, or that it was a leading role that allowed him to show off his versatility. He does, however, create a fairly interesting, nuanced character (one of the few present in TIPTOES) considering the fact that he is playing a character roughly half his actual height, who walks with a cane (to mask the uneven gait while on one's knees I presume), and has a thick southern accent, all this while performing in heavy make-up (well done by Greg Cannom). That said, casting a person of "normal" size to play a dwarf (I'll let the reader draw their own comparisons) only added to the negative reaction the film received upon its' initial theatrical release (which was limited, basically going straight-to-video) from critics and the LPA. As other reviewers have noted, the methods by which the filmmakers accomplish the "dwarfing" of Oldman, cinematic ally speaking, are somewhat distracting. I would guess that the limitations in budget and time did not allow Bright and his crew to integrate the special photographic techniques as seamlessly as in a film like DEAD RINGERS. It is somewhat refreshing for a film to be relatively free of CGI effects, but the stand-ins and limited camera angles are obtrusive in sections and ultimately hurt the film. 3/10
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Greatly disappointing
stella-415 August 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Warning: Spoilers

When I saw this movie as a new release at Blockbuster, I wondered why I'd never heard of it before in light of the big name actors involved. I was excited to view it, thinking it would be one of those under-appreciated but great films that so often don't get the attention they deserve.

My first thought was that I was disappointed they would cast Gary Oldman as Rolfe. There are so many talented little people I thought it was a slap in the face. But I understand Oldman was the weight behind the film; so I can accept the casting. And I thought his performance was wonderful. Even knowing ahead of time who he was, I still struggled to recognize him throughout the film.

Once I got past that, I tried to understand the point behind the film. Was it supposed to be a comedy? A drama? An introspective? The direction seemed unclear to me, and I had a hard time getting attached to the story. Despite being able to greatly enjoy Peter Dinklage's (LOVE him!) and Patricia Arquette's performances, I struggled to find out the purpose of their characters, how much of the my attention was supposed to be focused on them, Rolfe, Steven or Carol. But I hung in there.

Then a little more than halfway through the film I was invested. I felt strongly for Steven and Carol and their situation. I bought into their love for each other, and I wanted them to make it; so my hopes were high. SPOILER: I thought their separation was the turning point and my heart ached for the happy ending I wanted. Now maybe I was fooled by Matthew McConaughey's and Kate Beckinsale's chemistry, which I thought was palpable and believable. But I had no reason to believe that Steven wouldn't make the changes he needed to make.

I also had no reason to think that Carol and Rolfe would get together. No, I did not see it coming, nor do I feel I should have. I read that Beckinsale's character "fell in love with" Goldman's character. When did that happen? Did I blink? I didn't buy that plot line for a second, and I feel that's because I wasn't led to. The writing and direction fell flat there, making the ending much too abrupt and confusing. In fact, I felt cheated and even a little angered by the ending. I don't know what the writer intended, but the film I saw did not lead up to this. Not only was Matthew McConaughey's character more likable and real to me than Gary Oldman's (a wonderful job, but a bitter character), but there was ZERO chemistry between Oldman and Beckinsale. Their ending up together with Steven's child left me feeling heartbroken and offended...enough to add this comment here. (Normally I don't presume enough of myself to comment, but I was so affected I couldn't help myself.)

All of this is reason enough for me not to have enjoyed this film, not to mention the fact that the dialogue felt contrived in parts, the intent seemed unclear, and the editing felt choppy, and I feel like there are too many loose ends. I gave the film a 3. It's saving grace was some convincing performances.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing
ArizWldcat25 January 2004
This film premiered at Sundance and I was happy to have the opportunity to see it. I am a big fan of Gary Oldman and was looking forward to seeing him play a dwarf. The storyline was interesting; however the movie fell flat. Strangely enough, I was distracted by Oldman's portrayal of a dwarf...I kept wondering how they made him look so small instead of concentrating on the story. I never did figure out what Peter Dinklage and Patricia Arquette's characters had to do with the story; perhaps just to show that little people have relationships with "normal" size people...I don't know. I thought Dinklage, Arquette, Oldman and Kate Beckinsale all turned in good performances, but somehow all of them couldn't save this movie.
38 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Painful to watch.
lnvicta9 March 2016
I'd watch anything with Matthew McConaughey. Seriously. I've seen Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, I liked it, I've seen The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation, it was horrendous, I've seen his courtroom dramas A Time to Kill and The Lincoln Lawyer, love them. He's one of my favorite actors because no matter what genre he does, he's still entertaining as hell to watch. And don't even get me started on Gary Oldman. The Professional anyone? So when I saw the trailer for Tiptoes promising McConaughey and "a performance of a lifetime" by Gary Oldman, needless to say I was expecting greatness. Not really. But there has to be some redeeming value in a movie where two of my favorite actors play twin brothers and one of them is a dwarf, right? Well... no.

Tiptoes is exactly as terrible as you'd expect it to be. The premise alone, like who the hell thought of this? And why in god's name did McConaughey and Oldman agree to this abomination? Did they even read the script? Holy hell it's bad. It has some laugh out loud moments of course, I mean the premise lends itself to some horrifically awkward situations. One of the greatest lines in the movie is McConaughey yelling, "I'M A DWARF!" as his 6 foot tall body looms over Kate Beckinsale. It's classic. And the thing is, the acting is really good. Across the board. How they were able to deliver this dialogue with a straight face I'll never know. I can't imagine what their paychecks were.

There are some truly cringe-worthy moments in here as you can imagine. There's the whole drama over calling little people "midgets" and a pointless story between Peter Dinklage with a french accent and Patricia Arquette, as in it literally adds zero to the plot. And the ending, wow. Let's just say McConaughey got the short end of the stick.

I sat through this movie, you don't have to. Seriously the trailer goes through the entire plot, and it's infinitely funnier being 3 minutes long as opposed to a 90-minute brutal movie experience. In a way I'm glad Tiptoes was made because it's so insane and incredulous of a premise with these fantastic actors, it's like the best punchline of all time. But this movie tries to be serious, and because of that, it's painful to watch. Don't see Tiptoes.
75 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
terrible
matco9725 January 2004
just saw this at sundance last night. absolutely horrid. people left mid movie in droves. quite possibly the worst acting (save G.O.) i've seen in years. best line-"does it hurt to be a little person?" maybe, maybe not. but it is quite painful to watch this movie.
39 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Little Good in This Movie
baho21 February 2004
YOU'LL PROBABLY NEVER SEE THIS MOVIE BUT IF BY CHANCE YOU MIGHT THEN YOU SHOULDN'T READ THIS BECAUSE IT GIVES AWAY THE PLOT-LINE, BUT YOU PROBABLY WOULDN'T BELIEVE IT ANYWAY.

If I was going to look for an actor to play a sympathetic lead role of a dwarf for a straight-up drama about `little people,' naturally I would turn to Gary Oldman. Yes, that Gary Oldman. Dracula. The Devil. Pontius Pilate. Maybe 5'11'. I guess Al Pacino wasn't available.

This is a bizarre movie. Matthew McConaughey plays Oldman's brother (not a dwarf), so this Schwarzeneggar and Devito as Twins straight up. Both McConaughey and Kate Beckinsale turn in reasonable performances, as does Peter Dinklage. (As an aside, I think this guy is a terrific actor. In both this and Station Agent, soon into the movie I quit thinking about him as a dwarf.) However, I was most enchanted by the acting of the little people in the supporting cast. They brought me inside an inaccessible subculture and often made it very comfortable and believable.

However, Bogie, Bacall and the entire cast of the Wizard of Oz couldn't rescue this movie. This is an ambitious project with an intriguing premise. And apparently, Oldman is the one that drove the project, and he wanted to play a dwarf. (The kid that has the football gets to be quarterback?) But everything else about the movie is … bad. There were times when the Sundance crowd laughed at loud at some of the directing/editing. And the script seemed to be pieced together.

More Weirdness: At the premiere at Sundance, writer-director Matthew Bright scathingly denounced the film. He didn't watch the movie and said he never will. (`It's like making love to your ex-wife.') Bright apparently got into an argument with the financier of the film over creative differences. I think what I heard is that Bright wanted to close with a love scene between Oldman (playing a dwarf) and Kate Beckinsale. I guess the money-guy just didn't think the American public was ready for this. Anyway, according to Bright, he was fired from the movie and a bunch of inexperienced hacks who know nothing about the movie business finished the film. Bright said neither he nor none of the artists were paid a dime and that they didn't support the movie. Maybe this explains why this was such a disappointing film.
25 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What were they thinking?
bingoboy4602 October 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I have just viewed this film and, as usual went online to see others comments. This is one of the first times that I have ever felt compelled to comment myself...

I am mad at the actors, the director and the writer. One sigh of relief came when I saw that the writer has not written anything since that has made it to the screen.

I sat stunned for most of the film. The dialogue was so trite that if one more person asked Kate Beckinsale's character "how are you?" I was going to scream. In one scene they actually cut from Gary Oldman's character asking her the question and went to another scene in which he asked her the exact same question again!

It's a shame. I was looking forward to this film when I saw the cast line up. I can only hope and assume that everyone involved in the film was sufficiently embarrassed and upset by the finished product. A huge waste of talent.

(Potential spoiler) In one scene, you can actually see Kate Beckinsale stepping over Gary Oldman's legs that are not supposed to be there.

Enough. Really bad and, stealing the title from John Water's newest film (actually if he would have made this film, it would have been interesting)- it's a dirty shame.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ugh
dmasursky23 December 2009
Huge disappointment. Great cast, and it started out really promising, but by the end it was total Movie of the Week. Not sure what they were thinking - the movie seemed nicely offbeat during the first half but then it got bogged down in melodrama. I learned a lot about dwarfism of course, which seems like it was the point, but I didn't enjoy the movie and that's a shame. Kate Beckinsale is a terrific actress who can move effortlessly among genres, but she is ultimately wasted here in a part that a much less talented woman could have played. It was fun to see so many well-known Little People, and they were all excellent, but not enough to save the movie. Too bad, because this could have been something special.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How did they ever get funding for this?
skitch_ad2217 August 2004
This is quite possibly the worst film I have ever seen. The writing is both bizarre and predictable. The film has very little flow and except for Peter Dinklage all of the performances are stiff. I sincerely hope that Bill Weiner never picks up a pen again. I really do not understand how such big names could have been involved in what is effectively an after school special. There are a few scenes that qualify as funny in a campy sort of way, but the overall effect is that of sentimental schlock. I find myself deeply ambivalent about the characters; they were simply too idiotic and immature to connect with effectively. I regret not turning this film off half-way through; it represents an hour and a half of my life that I will never get back.
29 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A "little person" should have played Rolfe's role !!!
subherbian27 April 2005
I am a "little person" with a similar body type as the character Gary Oldman played. I had never heard of this movie until tonight when I was flicking through cable and it had already started. I watched for an hour thinking to myself that this guy looked like Gary Oldman... "holy crap this guy could play a dwarf Gary Oldman in some sort of movie". I finally realized it was him when they would never show his feet.

A lot of people said in there reviews that he wasn't convincing but I'll tell ya as someone who looks like he was supposed to, he was convincing! There were some key things he did which I thought was impressive. He never fully straightened his elbows or fingers. People like me are naturally like that due to arthritis and other bone ailments.

Anyway I'm still extremely annoyed that another movie with a "little person" as a lead role is played by a "regular" person. I could have played the part since I look a lot like the character. I also would have loved to have been smooching with Kate Beckinsale!! I would have done the movie for free just for that opportunity LOL
37 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bizarre, Could Have Been Worse
Bob_the_Hobo9 December 2010
"Tiptoes" had so much potential but as other IMDb reviews will tell you it falls flat quickly. The plot sounds interesting and Gary Oldman never disappoints, though his role is bizarre in this one. The plot quickly loses footing and doesn't know where it stands.

Matthew McCoanughey and his Kate Beckinsale play a couple who find that they'll be having a baby together, only to Matt's chagrin the baby could possibly be born a dwarf just as family. Gary Oldman plays his brother, who accidentally breaks the news. One of the Arquettes plays a weird supporting character that doesn't seem to have any relevance to the story. Peter Dinklage plays Oldman's friend.

Gary Oldman playing a dwarf...what's to be said? His "prosthetics" seem to be simply folding his legs back into his jeans, and nothing is used to hide that fact. McConaughey and Beckinsale do a well enough job, and Peter Dinklage is the only somewhat interesting person in the film. The Arquette is pretty pointless after a while.

It's one of those "I get where they're going, but..." movies. Very hit-or-miss, and for me it was a miss.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's hardcore fun. Try it out
gavinbell-113162 February 2019
In the past I've had a few bad exchanges with midgets. They're always angry which is weird because when they walk it looks like they have a really happy tune playing in their head. But after watching this film my opinion totally changed. The performances are high and tight. You should try it out.
37 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
fairly good film
widescreenguy16 August 2004
I don't know why this film got such bad reviews on IMDb. I'm becoming a big fan of Kate Beckinsale and this project is a natural progression in her career. I first saw her in 'much ado about nothing'.

the movie is about little people but is most definitely not patronizing. it shows a variety of life situations and problems they face, from social to medical to how to get laid. it really was a realistic film and thas what I look for, PLAUSIBILITY, regardless of the genre.

don't be afraid of the R rating, there isn't any nudity and just a bit of the f word here and there. I'm not surprised it won an award at sundance, regardless of how many people walked out. maybe they couldn't face such a challenge to their stereotypes of little people.

7/10
25 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Excellent Original Idea Wasted in an Awful Screenplay
claudio_carvalho30 December 2005
The beginning of "Tiptoes" is simply excellent and approaches a totally original theme: the painter Carol (Kate Beckinsale) and the firemen instructor Steven (Matthew McConaughey) are a young couple in love. The ambivalent Steven has a deep inner secret: he is the unique normal size man in his family of dwarfs, and he loves his family but he does not live comfortable with this situation. When Carol gets pregnant, coincidently the twin dwarf brother of Steven, Rolfe (Gary Oldman), pays an unexpected visit to Carol. She becomes shocked with the situation, while being introduced to Steven's family. The movie works perfectly up to this point, showing an open-minded woman accepting literally the minorities. However, from the moment when the Jewish parents of Carol are introduced to Steven's family on, the screenplay becomes irregular, corny in some moments, silly in others, and the open conclusion is very disappointing, indeed terrible.

It was good to see Gary Oldman in a sensational role, and the gorgeous Kate Beckinsale playing a really beautiful character, without any prejudice and accepting the imperfections of life. Patricia Arquette is still very hot, but she is very stereotyped in the role of the crazy Lucy. I regret that such excellent original idea being wasted in an awful screenplay. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "Na Ponta dos Pés" ("Tiptoes")
22 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Yipe
snowbuzzard5 January 2009
I grabbed this movie based on the title and starring roles, didn't read a synopsis, or look up what it was about. I never even saw a cover as I rented it in HD on PPV. I usually do this to make a film fresh.

After the first few minutes I was thinking okay, this could be interesting, which it indeed is. The acting is a little wavy, but the story was pretty true, and par for course, McConaughey had his shirt off in the first few moments.

Then the party scene hit, and everything got very bizarre. I suppose this could be the point that the cast and directing staff gave up, or possibly someone else took over the editing console.

It was evident that a huge continuity issue with Bridget-the Midget at the party started it all off, and it got squirrelly, almost comical. It became amusing to think that Gary Oldman probably took this role to get that "actor's stretch" that seems to get Oscars for those who play mentally challenged individuals.

I gave it a 4, out of sheer camp value.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The singularly worst film I have ever seen
lucymiddleweek-357132 February 2019
I watched this a while ago, and a it still holds a special place in my heart for being the first film I hate-enjoyed. It's so bad. There are storylines that aren't completed. There are characters that have no use. It's a little bit inappropriate. But if you enjoy bad films then it's a must watch, even if it just makes you appreciate how much work and effor must have been put into the good films; because TipToes clearly has ever little
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An Awful Film
nnpietro25 July 2010
So my girlfriend's mom rented this movie on Netflix. She claimed this movie had a great surprise. Don't worry! I won't give anything away! I assumed that "being a surprise" would somehow relate some aspect of the film to something in my life. This was wasteful and unnecessary thinking on my part. This movie was a 90 minute reel of soap opera acting. Apparently, the surprise to be communicated was the fact that Matthew McConaughey even starred in this film despite his already established success. Please do not watch this film. If so, be sure to arm yourself with the remote to turn it off when it finally hits you; and maybe an i Pod or mp3 just in case (GOD forbid) someone else in your vicinity enjoys this film. No acting, bad casting, no plot (just boring actually) and a horrible horrible film score. Thanks!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful Premise
jamesfukumoto28 October 2014
Let me just say something that one Daniel O'Brien of Cracked.com once said of this movie in a Youtube video titled "Officially the Worst Movie Idea Anyone's Ever Had". "Now I'm gonna pitch you a movie, this couple named Steve and Carol have a wonderful relationship. Everything is going well until Carol gets pregnant. Now Steve's deep dark secret is revealed. His entire family is dwarfs... Pretend that I stress that it's not a comedy, it's very, very serious, and let's say for argument's sake that my name is Weiner. I have just pitched you: 'Mr. Weiner's Very Serious Midget Movie'".

I really do feel that Mr. O'Brien captures the essence of the film in this alternate title.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
"Snow White" in reverse
david_griffith10 December 2003
Some great physical acting from Gary Oldman and an excellent cast of dwarves cannot lift this formulaic inversion of the "Snow White" story. What is clearly a PC motivated movie also suffers from risible plotting, horrificly inappropriate dialogue about dwarves circle jerking, and offensive racism against Palestinians and Blacks who are portrayed respectively as dwarf-beating brutes or men who cannot control their animal urges. The overall effect of this hotpotch of worthy motives, dreadful writing, and journeyman directing is that the viewer feels like they are watching a train wreck in slow motion. In fact this movie is so bad it's destined to become a cult classic as one of the worst movies of all time. And before you think it I don't have "a problem with little people" and I "don't need a shrink"!
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't tiptoe away from this movie, it is an unusually thoughtful film
inkblot1113 November 2006
Carol (Kate Beckinsale) is somewhat surprised to find herself pregnant. But, overall, she is happy. Her longtime boyfriend, Stephen (Matthew McConaghey) shows himself to be most unhappy, however, and wants her to get an abortion. That is because he has never told Carol the family secret. Stephen is the "normal" son of a mother and a father who happen to be dwarfs. His brother, Rolfe (Gary Oldman) is also a dwarf. Carol is stunned and frightened to learn that her baby has a chance of being a dwarf, too. When Carol is introduced, finally, to Stephen's family, her outlook brightens and she is ready to embrace her role as a mother, whatever the circumstances. What will Stephen do? This is a most thoughtful movie with a tender look at the subject of dwarfs. Most of us know little or nothing about their situation yet this film is very approachable and enlightening without being didactic. Beckinsale is wonderful as the woman who, although thrust into a difficult position, learns to look at life differently and more lovingly. The other actors are all very fine, especially the cast of dwarfs. The production values of the film are quite high, considering that, for example, Oldman is not a dwarf but must look like one. Most importantly, this is a film that is a stepping stone to a greater understanding between folks of different strokes, as they say. Anyone who wishes to bridge any gaps, be they racial, religious, ethnic, and so on, should arrange a showing among a diverse audience. Everyone will benefit, even as they are caught up in engaging and offbeat tale.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Disappointing
agnieszkaszypula27 December 2019
I am not sure what I expected but after watching it I am just disappointed. Sorry, maybe I misunderstood, maybe it was a point in all of it but I didn't get it. It's a no from me, will not watch it again or recommend it. I gave 2 stars only because of my favorite actors.... Nothing else to add. Shame.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A misunderstood American masterpiece.
The_Wood14 August 2004
It is very rare that I write comments for films anymore, but after witnessing the wonderful Tiptoes, and reading all the negative feedback, I felt inclined.

The movie is never played for laughs, as I originally thought it would be. Instead Tiptoes has got to be the most honest look at the life of dwarfs, I have ever seen. The film examines the serious subject matter of, if you knew your child was going to be a dwarf would you still want to have it? Would you still love it? Gary Oldman (the finest working actor in films today) gives an amazing performance as the title character. His work here should have earned him an Oscar. Yes Gary plays a dwarf, but its an honest performance -- not just a gimmick. Matthew McCognaughey and Kate Beckinsale quite frankly have never been better. Peter Dinklage has got to be given props for turning a nothing role into something special.

I loved this movie. Ignore the bad buzz and enjoy this fine misunderstood American Masterpiece. 10/10
32 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disappointing
JennyMenny1 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Well, I only happened upon this movie through the On Demand feature of my cable company. The cast seemed promising, so I watched it late tonight. The movie is utterly disappointing because it could have been really good. After reading some of the other comments, I have to agree that the editing killed this film. It didn't seem to flow properly and there were giant holes in the plot. For instance, when Matthew McConaughey's character decides to meet Carol and Rolfe at the party, he asked the hot blonde student to come with him. Why? Then at the party he introduces her and that is the last we see of her. What was all that? Some of the commenters have stated that Steven (his character) had an affair with her. That would make more sense. Also, as mentioned, the baby was so fake at some points that it was almost funny. However, nothing compares to ridiculous ending... I sort of saw it coming, but it was just not right. Carol and Rolfe together? It's wrong. Not because he is a dwarf and she is not, and not because Steven is so confused and conflicted. She is his sister-in-law. Steven claims he loves her and the son, but she just decides to get together with Rolfe. It was odd and unnatural at the end and then we get no closure just the credits. Peter Dinklage and Patricia Arquette seemed wasted in this film. At the end, they just sort of dissipated into nothing and that was it. I LOVE Peter Dinklage. He was amazing in Station Agent, and he could have done so much if just given the chance. The dialogue was weak (that's being polite). The writer tried to be realistic but he ended up being simple and uninspired. I will give the film credit because it deals with dwarfism but it is not about dwarfs. They are part of the film, but not the entire story. The dwarfism is collateral to the other subplots. I guess the film lacked finances and agreement, and that reflects in the final product.

All in all, I am glad I watched it. I was just disappointed because I could tell it could have been better. The performances were decent, but there wasn't enough to work with. Gary Oldman (who once played the ominous Dracula) surprises as a dwarf. He is just fantastic. I don't know how he did, but he did it well.

I would watch it again, but I don't think I would pay to rent it. It wasn't that bad, but don't expect something fantastic even with the impressive ensemble.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Why God, why?!
angry-man12 July 2008
Gary Oldman is a brilliant actor sure, but whoever cast him as a dwarf amongst other real life dwarfs should have their head examined. If you're making a movie about dwarfism (such as is the case here), for God's sake cast a REAL dwarf in the title role! Anything less is just an insult to little people and anybody who watches this sad excuse for a film.

In addition, the script and characters frequently come off very contrived, the direction and pacing are sloppy at best, and the melodrama and lack of chemistry do not help this train wreck make it to the station.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It could have been good
Gordon-1120 August 2006
This film is about a pregnant woman finding out that the father of her foetus is from a family of dwarfs.

This film could have been really good. The idea of making a film of dwarfs in a positive way was excellent, and I definitely applaud that. However, there are some problems with this film. First the casting is bad. The setup of Matthew McConaughey and Kate Beckinsale screams of it being a romantic comedy, and yet, it turned out to be a serious film. Secondly, the film started off as a romantic comedy and then quickly becomes a drama of a couple not able to cope with the stress of a newborn child. As a result, the film looks as if it was trying to deal with too many topics at once.

I feel that if there were more development about the stress of a newborn child having a genetic condition, and less romantic comedy elements, it would have been a great drama.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed