Tilt (TV Series 2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Poker plus Michael Madsen? I'm sold.
CaptainLombard3322 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
First off. If you decide to start watching the show because you solely want to watch poker, you'll be in for disappointment. But if you like a darker serial with poker elements, like I do, this is worth a watch, and I speak as a person who has logged countless hours of televised poker.

The Ace in the Hole turns out to be the nominal star, Michael Madsen as Don "The Matador" Everest. I say nominal because, while he's definitely a leading character as the show's primary antagonist, the focus is a bit more on upstart Eddie Towne, played by Eddie Cibrian. Still, I'm a massive fan of Madsen since "Reservoir Dogs," and he gets plenty of screen time. The scenes between Madsen and Cibrian, whether together or apart, pop. I'd not seen Cibrian in anything prior to this, but He was a more than capable protagonist.

Other standouts include Chris Bauer as Lee Nickel, a cop out of his jurisdiction determined to bring Everest down over the death of his brother, working with local authorities, federal agencies, even Matador's associates in a desperate attempt to bring him down. He's more familiar for playing another cop, Andy Bellefleur on "True Blood," though here he gets to play a lawman with no comedic slant.

The remainder of the main cast has less showy roles, but as an amateur critic, I found no fault in their performances. The female lead portrayed by Kristin Lehman is only known as Miami, and brings a nice intensity to her role, and surprisingly, while partners with Towne, the series declines to follow the old trope and make the partnership romantic between them. The last playing member of the team is Todd Williams as Clark Marcellin. The three have an excellent chemistry together.

Also of note are casino mogul Michael Murphyas Jimmy Molloy, and Don McManus as casino manager Bart "Lowbal" Rogers. Who are in league with Everest. As the series begins, Everest essentially works for the casino, bringing in suckers who want to take on the famous pro.

Towne, Miami, and Marcellin eventually gross paths with Seymour Annisman (Kenneth Welsh) who brings them together as a team to try and take Everest down. However, things come to a head at the halfway point in the series, and the plans have to be rewritten. The series culminates at the WSOP stand-in "The World Championship of Poker," and features supporting appearances from famous WSOP commentators Lon McEachern and Norman Chad. Phil Hellmuth has an extended cameo during the tournament scenes, having a verbal sparring match with Madsen's Everest. Daniel Negreanu, Erik Seidel, David Williams,and T.J. Cloutier also make cameos. The late great Robert Forster also makes an appearance as Towne's estranged father.

The one thing that I appreciated is that the poker only mildly stretched credibility. In films like "Maverick," the hero beats the villain with a Royal Flush. "Casino Royale" was a great film, but the poker scenes were a stretch, especially a four way all in featuring an ace high flush, a full house, a higher full house, and a straight flush.

Here, a key hand involves A/K/ vs pocket sixes, and the flop ends up as A/K/6. Yes, it's convenient that the hands fall the way they do, but it's a situation I've seen many times playing online poker, and even sometimes in live poker. There wasn't a need by the writers to jam in a bunch of huge hands to make the audience go "WOW!" they're realistic and straightforward.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Convoluted plot, but dynamite poker action
bjguilfoyle28 February 2005
I was going to wait until this series ended to review it, but why bother? This is simply a killer series. The story is pretty complicated, with subplots galore surrounding each character, but that's not why I watch it. Michael Madsen is perfect as poker baddie Don Everest- ruthless, conniving, and dressed to kill in those 80s collars and vests. And best of all is the assortment of characters, dialog, and voice-over narration that you get during the poker sequences. As if that weren't enough, they added one of my favorite actors, Robert Forster, in the last episode. The only unfortunate part is that it's hard to get up to speed if you missed the first few episodes, due to all the different plot aspects. At this point it's better to wait for a catch-up night, or buy the full DVD set when it comes out.

To sum up, the story is contrived, but who cares? The cast is great and the poker sequences alone are worth watching it for. Kudos to ESPN for their best series yet!!! Like MM says before the deal, "Let's rock and roll, baby".
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful show, this one should die quickly and quietly
slandrumlhs5 February 2005
This show is awful. While its depiction of the technicalities of the play of poker is accurate, the actual situations that develop and the representation of poker in general is awful. There are no characters to root for in the show, all of the people are really bad people. Some have reasons for why they are less than acceptable specimens of the human race, but they should all be disposed of. The writing is rife with clichés and stereotypes, and all of the worst kind. It's actually painful to watch.

I was initially interested in the show because I do play poker and am familiar with the poker world and the professional players. I also know some of the people involved in the show, so I really wanted to like it.

I'm sorry to say this show does a complete disservice to poker, to television and to the audience. There are some less than reputable characters in the poker world, but this show makes it seem like the game is filled with nothing but con men, hustlers, cheats and worse. It's interesting that they chose this take on poker, as right now poker is more popular than it has ever been in history, and poker shows are among the most popular on ESPN, as well as other channels.
0 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't look for REALISTIC poker, just have FUN with it!
LittleGus11 February 2005
After watching the first four episodes of Tilt it's pretty easy to gather that the show is far fetched and promotes the idea of cheating. If you're looking for REAL poker, go watch re-runs of the WSOP on ESPN Classic or World Poker Tour on Travel Channel, but if you just want a fun show with a poker theme embedded into it, then give Tilt a try. Michael Madsen's character is laugh out loud funny with some of his one liners, and granted the acting from the others is below par, you can't really set the bar high for ESPN shows, especially after Playmakers. So again, if you want a few cheap laughs and just enjoy poker in general, give this show a shot. If you're looking to brush up on your skills and try to play in next years WSOP, then save the criticism and go read Super System! :)
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
OK ESPN...you have my interest.
contestpromo15 January 2005
I haven't been real impressed with many of ESPN's ventures into original movies or programming. I saw a couple of episodes of "Playmakers" but it didn't keep me coming back. "3" wasn't bad...neither was "The Junction Boys" but I absolutely hated "Hustle" and the "Season on the Brink". That said, I watched "Tilt" with guarded optimism.

What I came away with after the first episode is the interest to at least see the second. The character development seems very good and, already, you want to see the "Matador" (Michael Madsen's character) fall and fall hard.

Lots of casino action, suspense, even a bit of flesh appear to be the ingredients here...and my wife probably said it best when she said, "You definitely won't see this on Lifetime"...
24 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Best show on TV
ramam0116 March 2005
I have to say I wasn't originally going to watch the show, but my friend came over the day the series premiered so I was forced into it. I'd have to say though it is definitely a must see.

Its the only show during the week I block out time for. I've seen all 9 episodes the day they aired. Way better than the last ESPN drama Playmakers.

It's like a weekly soap opera. It involves way more than just poker. Can't wait until it comes out on DVD. Before season two starts I'd recommend watching the re-runs of episode one and getting the story down before the 2nd season starts. Watch them in order or you'll get lost.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheesy, B-movie quality with a Bruckheimer/Michael Bay sense of contrived style
liquidcelluloid-120 April 2007
Network: ESPN; Genre: Drama, Crime; Content Rating: TV-14 (language, strong sexual content, brutal violence); Available: DVD; Perspective: Contemporary (star range: 1 - 4);

Seasons Reviewed: Complete Series (1 season)

Following in the footsteps of their first drama series, the controversial "Playmakers", ESPN's "Tilt" takes an unflattering look at the world of high stakes Las Vegas poker. "Playmakers" was an admirable failure, riddle with as many accomplishments as clichés. "Tilt" takes advantage of the national surge in interest for Texas Hold'Em, then turns around and bites the hand that fed it that opportunity. How dare the public not have recognized a game that has been around since the old west until now. There was some cynical fun in "Playmakers" take on football, but "Tilt" is an angry, bitter, relentlessly soul-sucking experience that is so single-minded in its attempt to demonize Vegas that the city could consider a defamation suit.

When family man and cop Lee (Chris Bauer, "The Wire") sits down at the high stakes table he gets cleaned out by Don "The Matador" Everest. It turns out that Don is not only a legend in the poker world, but a strong arm of the casino sent to make sure that the house wins at all costs. If Lee wasn't enough of a pit bull bent on bringing down Everest, three pro poker players (Eddie Cibrian, Kristin Lehman, and Todd Williams), who were also at one time ruined by The Matador, team up to bring him down during the national poker championships.

The poker action is as exciting as poker action gets. But creators Brian Koppelman and David Levien don't trust that poker will hold the narrative (a more talented team could have made it work), so they fill the stories with mobster, FBI agents, scam artists and a little murder mystery. Their Vegas is a full-on sadistic nightmare of a city, more "The Sopranos" than "Las Vegas", that sucks people in and eats them alive like a big neon monster. If the casino owners aren't crooked enough, the cops and judges are. Every few minutes somebody is being brutally beaten, casually murdered or tortured all set to trashing rock music. Nothing wrong with being loud, except when it is used as a transparent attempt to cover up a thread-bare nonsensical story.

None of the characters are the slightest bit likable. Everybody growls and snarls either out of revenge or detachment or sheer black-and-white evil for the sake of evil. B-movie staple Michael "pardon me while I never clear my throat" Madsen is the worst as Everest. This unconvincing tough guy has 2 purposes: threatening in a gruff voice and beating while yelling in a gruff voice.

The show is filled with monologues relating poker to life while saying nothing at all. On paper, on HBO or FX, this might not be a recipe for disaster, but Koppelman and Levien have a Jerry Bruckheimer/Michael Bay sense of subtlety and ESPN doesn't have the experience or sense of quality control to rein them in. Under their eye a simple poker revenge drama becomes a loud, tacky, empty-headed, testosterone-fueled piece of punishment. "Tilt" is cheesy, B-movie stuff – and not the fun kind either.

* / 4
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheesy, but fun to watch.
Justin970014 March 2005
I would be lying if I didn't say I was disappointed with the TV series, "Tilt". I thought Rounders was a brilliant movie, and expected the TV show to be at least close to as good as the movie. My impression after watching the first few episodes was that a lot of the acting was bad (except for Madsen, of course), the writing was cheesy, and there wasn't that much actual poker playing involved. Tha being said, however, I watched the whole series without missing an episode. Despite its flaws, the show is interesting, and makes sure that you want to watch the next episode to see what happens. If you haven't seen it yet, don't expect "Rounders: The Series", but expect a show that is fun to watch, and will have you quote lines from it with your friends.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An interesting offer from ESPN
wtbe756015 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
May contain spoilers!

ESPN takes another foray into the entertainment portion of the sports arena with "Tilt", a new series focusing on the world of high stakes poker. Michael Madsen plays "The Matador", the world's best poker player, and a hustler.

"The Matador" is in league with seemingly everyone - the owners of the casino, the police, other players, and is using his influence to fleece the unsuspecting opponents he faces. He is opposed on two sides, first by the county sheriff brother of a man who tried to expose the Matador's cheating, and also by a trio of young players whom the Matador had cleaned out in the past by cheating. The young players are being staked by a mysterious older man who also has a grudge against the Matador.

Unlike other poker series out there (Lucky comes to mind), this show seems fluid and well written. Madsen convincingly plays an amoral scumbag and the supporting cast is excellent. Those of you familiar with the poker world will notice the similarities between the character of the Matador and with real life poker icon Doyle Brunson. Most of the script seems to based on real life accusations made against the poker great by people like Russ Georgiev, who claims to have actively cheated at poker with many of the greats of the game. More on this can be seen at Georgiev's website. It is an interesting view into both this series and the seedly underbelly of pro poker.

All in all - an excellent show.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Quit listening to the haters, they don't know anything about poker anyway!
ivand8725 January 2005
After 2 episodes, I have to say I'm already a fan of this show.

A couple of haters here, who probably don't know anything about poker and were too slow to understand what was going on, are talking badly about the show.

Don't listen to them. This show has a very nice cast, is well written, and it has all the elements you'd want from an action series. Michael Madsen kicks ass as The Matador - but right away, the intrigue of seeing him fall to Eddie, Miami and Clark is too much, and you just wanna see how it will all develop.

Add to this a lot of danger surrounding a cop who is after the Matador himself, trying to avenge his late brother, who was killed by the Matador, and you got a big hit! I never watched Playmakers. I heard it was good, but it turned out to be a good thing I didn't watch since ESPN's affiliation with the NFL forced that show to get cancelled.

That won't happen to Tilt - this show will be a success!
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
ESPN needs practice showing its shows
ZCT19 March 2005
I've just seen the final episode of Tilt and have to say enjoyed the series. It was by no means perfect, some of it was a shade predictable, some of the acting and dialogue was a little below par. But overall if you're the kind of person that likes watching poker and enjoyed the movie Rounders you're probably going to enjoy this offering from ESPN.

My only complaint was the horrible scheduling of ESPN. If it wasn't for DVR I never would have seen every episode, which sucks as the storyline is sequential from one episode to the next. Even with DVR you'd have run into problems since three weeks running ESPN were over 30 minutes late showing an episode because of some ball game. Then they decided to move the finale to an entirely different day. It was almost like they were trying to kill the ratings. If ESPN want to make another season or indeed another series like this they need to schedule it properly or sell it to another network.

If you can actually see all the episodes in order, and you're a poker fan, I think you'll enjoy. If you are a 'poker is not a sport' kind of person who doesn't think mental games of skill are interesting, stay clear. Oh and it has some adult themes, if you dislike such things don't watch.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What can they do for a second season???
RoseAnn13 March 2005
*spoilers if you haven't seen the finale...read at your own peril...*

Okay, so how predictable was that??

All the good guys won; all the bad guys got what they deserved; and the guy who straddled the line between the two got the brass ring because he (pardon the horrible pun) played his cards right.

And so we drink a final toast to Seymour...the cop goes home to Iowa...our three young heroes leave the field of battle vindicated and much, much richer.

What can they do for a season two?? A new bad guy for us to hate?? New unknown card players for us to cheer on to victory? And Lowball making another interesting visit to the house of ill repute?!?!?!?

It was interesting and novel for one go-round...sort of the way Survivor was for the first season...but won't this get predictable if they try it again?

I did enjoy the poker scenes, although there were certainly blatant errors (I even saw one tonight...when you watch the finale, look at the screen closely on Clark's last hand and see if you spot what I did). It was nice to see the sprinkling of the well-known players throughout the series. But I'd much rather watch the reruns of the WSOP if it came down to a choice between that and another season of this show.

I'll give the season a 6 out of 10...good acting for the most part (although Michael Madsen did seem a bit flat to me most of the time...but maybe that was the jaded part of his character). Points off for such a predictable plot and finale. There was just one more cliché they could have thrown in to make the fairy tale complete...reveal that Miami was Seymour's long lost granddaughter or niece or some distant relative (I thought about daughter, but that kind of destroys the part of the storyline that she was playing to raise money for her father's bail with Seymour's assistance).

But, of course, I will tune in for at least the first episode of another season...if nothing else to see the real-life pros wander in and out of that very realistic-looking set.

P.S. (added after second viewing a few minutes ago): ACK! I just caught the final scene...which I somehow missed the first time. That changes everything...and potentially changes the cast for next season (if there is one). Not quite such a tidy ending as it first appeared. Hmm....
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This show has mesmerized me
trauder20 January 2005
What can you say about this show? Nothing good, except that the levels of terrible this show achieves are so complete it is impossible to look away. Its a train wreck of bad lighting, stilted dialog and ridiculous plot. The narration from our main character comes off as completely lame. When we are not being treated to the inner monologue of, some other character is spouting off "quality" lines such as "You play cards; you're not a card-player." The non-stop barrage of poker jargon, perhaps with some demented eye towards establishing "street cred" with the poker world is so bad it borders on self-parody.

This show is mind-bogglingly bad. But, it is one of those monumental failures that you just can't stop watching. You will sit there, in a dazed stupor, wondering if there were any way the show could possibly be worse, but everything you come up with will invariably make the show better.

The producers of "Tilt" have helpfully placed a warning at the beginning of each airing, presumably to prevent young people from taking up poker. I can think of no better way to ensure that a child will never want to play poker than by having them watch this show.
12 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I have seen better acting in tough act in' Tinactin.
bandonbeachbum8 February 2005
Wow, the only acting I have seen this bad was in the movie Showgirls. This girl that plays Miami acts as if she studied under Elizabeth Berkley. The writing is awful to be kind. It seems like the only hand Michael Madson can turn over is a straight holding crap cards like a 5 and an 8 to pull a straight. That girl who plays young Miami should have her SAG card taken away. This show is terrible for the poker community. It gives the impression that to be a successful poker player you have to be a cheat. People are not going to go to Vegas and play in big money games it they think they are being cheated by friends who all sit at the same table.
6 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
ESPN Needs To Stop Making Movies
joshmajka-115 January 2005
First of all, I don't know when Poker became a sport. I guess when all my uncle's got together on weekends to play cards they were showing off their athletic skills huh? Anyway, I digress...

I have seen all of the ESPN movies and each one has been horrible, and Tilt is no exception. Bad acting, predictable story, and very low budget look just like all the rest. Plus, ESPN plugs the heck out of their movies...I swear I saw a commercial for Tilt once during every commercial break I saw on ESPN the past couple of weeks leading up to it's premier.

Anyway, my advice is...don't waste your time watching this movie. Hopefully ESPN will stick to SportsCenter.
6 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another mistake in Tilt-Season Finale
billybreathe13 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
There was another mistake on this show in the season finale. When at the final table of the World Championship of Poker, The Metador, Miami and Eddie Towne were in on a hand with the board reading... T J Q. The Metador had the made straight with 98 in the hole. Eddie had AA and Miami had TT to give her a set. After everyone checked the flop, a K came up to give Eddie the Ace high straight. On this card the t.v. reads that Eddie has a 90% chance of winning, Miami a 10% shot and The Metador with a 0%(dont quote me on the percentages). The error here is that The Metador had just as good a chance of hitting an Ace and splitting with Eddie as Miami. Did anyone else catch this?
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed