"Hawaii Five-O" Here Today... Gone Tonight (TV Episode 1973) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Cleverly Done Episode Based on a Man being in Two Places at Once
Aldanoli14 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
"Here Today . . . Gone Tonight" is an enjoyable episode of "Hawaii Five- O" — in many ways, the equivalent of a locked-room mystery, wherein paranoid industrialist Peter Fleming (Douglas Kennedy) has what appears to be the only office atop a tall building in Honolulu, shielded by an elaborate security system (guards, cameras, metal detectors, etc.). All of this would apparently make it impossible for anyone to kill him — or at least, to do so without someone leaving an indelible trail of who got in and out to do it.

The villain — if that's the right word — is played by Monte Markham, making the third of his four appearances on "Five-O" (and the last until the show's final season). Markham plays Barry Dean, Fleming's top deputy, who apparently pulls off the caper while simultaneously being with an impeccable alibi witness — Danny Williams, whom Dean (apparently as paranoid as his boss) has invited to his beach house on Maui to turn over incriminating evidence against Fleming. If Dean was in the beach house on Maui with Danny, how could he be killing Fleming back in Honolulu when there wasn't enough time for him to get there and back?

Writer Jerome Coopersmith has created this elaborate paradox, setting up an intriguing mystery for both McGarrett and the viewer to try to solve. Of course, given that this is "Hawaii Five-O," it's foregone that McGarrett will solve it; this mystery might be dubbed a "howdunnit" instead of a "whodunnit," with the only questions being how McGarrett will figure things out, and how long it will take. Markham, who can simultaneously project both apparent innocence and menace, was an excellent choice for the role of Dean. And because this is one of those episodes — like one of those oh-so-clever bank heists — where the audience spends a lot of time with the villain, one almost comes to be rooting for the bad guy and against McGarrett, given the cleverness of the scheme.

The script also features a number of other interesting touches, including the episode's opening, with an initially confusing montage of scenes with two men — both of them apparently Barry Dean — who exhibit contradictory traits (one a sports fan, the other not; one a conservative dresser, the other not; one a drinker, the other not; etc.) Is this a double, or is it Dean playing two roles? Little touches like this are what make the episode fun to watch, even if there are aspects of the resolution to the mystery that seem a bit far-fetched once it's been solved.

The episode also features two surprisingly strong (if brief) roles for two familiar actresses: Madlyn Rhue plays Fleming's much younger wife June, who apparently can barely tolerate Barry Dean, while Sandra Smith makes her second and final appearance on "Five-O" as an insurance investigator whose company has five million reasons to get out of paying off June Fleming's life insurance policy. Smith's character then takes on what amounts to an undercover role -- one performed in other episodes by a random policewoman (e.g., Patricia Smith in the premiere episode "Full Fathom Five," or Anne Helm in the Season Two outing, "Just Lucky, I Guess"). It was a curious choice to create a new character like this for just one episode; had Smith done this on a semi-regular basis it might have made for interesting continuity, but this is her solo appearance in the role.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
We like Monte Markham ... but ...
VetteRanger12 January 2023
At this point in his career, Monte Markham was always an appealing presence on screen, but always played the "surprise heavy" ... meaning while he was clean cut and personable and supposed to be a surprise as the heavy, you always knew he was going to be the bad guy. LOL

I think this was just prior to the attempt to make him "The New Perry Mason", a show which lasted one season and which débuted in 1973.

This episode stretched far and failed to catch the brass ring. It attempted to give the murderer eye witnesses but also an unshakeable alibi. Unfortunately, the writers derailed their own invention with two massive plot holes. Had they the time and imagination to explain those two questionable circumstances, it would have been a perfect show and gained three or four more stars from me.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An interesting plot that is undone by HUGE plot holes.
planktonrules5 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is a maddening episode of "Hawaii Five-O" to watch, as the basic story idea is great but the execution is just awful thanks to huge holes in the script as well as not enough time to fully develop the plot.

A top executive of a huge mega-corporation approaches McGarrett at a party and tells him he is ready and willing to turn over evidence that this corporation is involved in many illegal activities--including murder. However, he acts cagey and tells McGarrett he'll only hand over the evidence and discuss it if his security instructions are followed precisely. Danno is sent on this odd mission and a helicopter ferries him off to an undisclosed meeting place at night. However, during the meeting this exec appears to be having heart trouble and leaves, briefly, for a heart test. He returns in less than a half hour--during which time you see him killing his boss! But, as the boss and this hideout are on different islands and it was impossible to be meeting with Danny AND kill the boss, the informant appears to have a great alibi.

As I said above, this plot is pretty cool. But here are the problems. Near the end of the episode, McGarrett comes up with the solution to the deception--and it's not one bit apparent how he figured this out. It's as if he'd just read the script and this was a HUGE deductive jump to say the least. Also, when the method for how the deception occurred is demonstrated to Danno by McGarrett, this STILL makes no sense. How did the conspirators get Danny from inside this building to the meeting place without Danny knowing he was indoors?! How did they find this place? And, if this building is NOT where the simulator was and McGarrett was only demonstrating how this COULD have happened, how could such an elaborate contraption have been rigged up so quickly and inexpensively?! None of this makes any sense at all--and it's like 10-15 minutes more was needed to work out the details. This is sloppy to say the least... and makes it among the poorer episodes of the season. Too bad--the idea could have been great.

Also, while it didn't make a huge difference, I think the show would have been more suspenseful had the audience NOT seen the murder occur and instead kept them wondering as well how the deception occurred. The way they did it on the show seemed less interesting and more anticlimactic.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed