User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Shockingly good compared to the terrible 1962 version.
planktonrules2 June 2018
"Time Out for Ginger" (1955) is the first of two attempts to launch this sit-com based on a 1950s play. However, the networks never picked it up and they attempted in the early 1960s to re-launch the series but once again the series was not picked up by the networks. This first attempt is interesting due to its impressive cast which starred Jack Benny, Ruth Hussey, Edward Everett Horton and many other familiar faces. Both the 1955 and 1962 pilot episodes are available to watch on YouTube. The 1962 version, by the way, is simply awful...is the 1955 one the same?

In the 1962 version, the focus clearly is on Ginger...constantly in fact. And, her character was extremely loud and very obnoxious. Here, in contrast, the star clearly is the father, Howard (Jack Benny). It begins with Howard making a speech at school about equality and the repercussions. A lot of people become angry (such as the principal and Howard's boss) but Ginger loves it and decides to go out for the football team! The plot is an extremely modern thing...especially since Howard is thrilled his daughter wants to be on the high school's football team as well as how physical the relationship was between the parents on the show!

When you compare the two versions of this show, the 1955 version is superior in every way...plus it afforded Jack Benny a rare chance to stretch his acting range. In fact, the show might have worked had the networks picked it up...whereas the 1962 version was so hellishly bad I can't see how any sane network executive could have okayed the program for production! Well worth seeing.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Comparison between play, t.v. version, pilot, and film -
sheldonlinda25 July 2020
I finally finished reading "Time out for Ginger" and then last night watched the "Shower of Stars" tv version, and the t.v. pilot version. Interesting to see what changes were made from the play to the t.v. version to the pilot.

The two sisters were combined in the pilot and then the sister's storyline was changed completely for the film. Oh and the name goes back and forth from Joan and Jeanne, to Joan, to Jean.

Fun to see a dark haired accentless Karl Swenson. Oh, I guess that sounds kind of racist, it is just different and a switch after growing up knowing him primarily as Lars Hanson on "Little House on the Prairie."

Somehow Candy Moore got directed - misdirected question mark - to be a too loud, too butting in overgrown female Dennis the Menace. It is too bad that the pilot failed probably bec of that - but yet DM lasted for how many seasons??? Without that, I can see that the show could have had some heart and some promise. I guess that you are not familiar with the currently running Canadian drama "Heartland" but it has the character of "Mallory" who is overly talkative and always butting in. She brings in the comic relief,butyou can't help totally loving her. If the pilot version had made Ginger that kind of character, maybe the show could have worked.

I especially liked Roberta Shore. Since she is LDS, I know a bit of her career. She did several things here and there, but it would have been nice to see her in more of a main part in a hit show. She may not have been able to carry her own show like Marlo Thomas, but I can see her taking the Tim Considine/ Don Grady oldest child role in a female "My Three Sons" or an ensemble role in a 60's "Facts of Life" or a t.v. version of "Daddy Long Legs" sans the quizzical 80 year old love interest. (Poor Leslie Caron and Audrey Hepburn with their similar stories both being paired with Fred Astaire who though great was far too old for them to be playing against.)

Candy Moore is far too femnine to be convincing as a tom boy, and Janet Parker is a bit too unattractive to carry a show - though convincing as a tom boy. It is a difficult balance. Patty Duke does show that with a nice balance. I still don't care though for her hair in "Billie."

Difficult conclusion in the play, t.v. version, and film - not addressed in the pilot - that you can't be a girl and athletic. I dunno. I somewhat follow BYU women's athletics. The gymnasts are of course all cute petite feminine girls, but some of the volley-ball players, soccer players and basketball players are ... not. But, yet there are some who are. I dunno. I know that we have discussed all of those things before.

Oh the opening dialogue in the pilot between Agnes and Lizzie was well done. It that tone - although far too sexist for today's standards - had been the tone of the entire show - it also would have worked.

Interesting to see that many lines in the original play made it into the film in spite of the story line with the sister being changed from being in play to being newly married, and the story line of the dad from his bank job being in jeopardy to his run for mayor being in jeopardy.

I still don't get why Ginger/ Billie asks her father out on a date to the play/ victory dance when the family is supposed to be going together - and what about the mom. Daddy daughter dates are great, but as their own thing and not a thing as part of a family activity.

Interesting too to see what getting dressed up meant in the '50's, to being dressed up in the '60's. The message though is the same. Ginger/ Billie's sudden caterpillar to butterfly transformation from a tom boy into a young woman.

I was surprised that Ginger at the end of the play brings up that as kind of a joke that they let her play the last couple of minutes and opened up allowing her to score, basically to be making fun of her not taking her seriously, or treating her as what she desired - a total equal. Ginger complains about it, but then it didn't get further dealt with. There was no further discussion, or anything made of Ginger's trauma or frustration with it. In Billie, Billie legitimatly wins, but I don't think that in real life that a track meet would have that much fan attention, cheerleaders, or her being carried off the field.

Two films both based on real events - "Rudy" and "1000 to 1: The Cory Weissman Story" at the end of a game - Rudy football, 100 to 1 basketball bring in a deserving player to finish off the game, but it is out of love, not to make light of them. It is a way of honoring a player who has played his heart out, but situations didn't him to enable to contribute to the team the way that he would have desired.

Cute dialogue in the play with Howard embellishing his own life stories, and acting as if he was the one who got the win. That doesn't happen in the film.

The play is teeny teeny bit racy - as complared to the film. I've never been to Broadway, but my guess is that if I were to go to Broadway now that I wouldn't find anything that I was comfortable with.

One of the IMBD reviewers thought that the Shadow of Stars version was also a pilot. I don't think so. Wasn't it kind of a thing in the '50's to do different plays on t.v.? I know you can see "The Fantasticks" that way - it is now posted on line, and I can't remember if it was "Oklahoma" or "Carousel" or what it was that I also saw.

Anyway, interesting to see the evolution, from play to t.v. to t.v. pilot to film
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed