The Anatomy of Hate (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Deserves To Be Seen.
rmax30482324 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The brain evolved over millions of years, building on itself. First, the brainstem that controls vital functions like breathing and heartbeat. Then the midbrain, that governs some higher functions like memory and emotions, and finally the cerebral cortex -- all that gray matter we see on the exposed surface, which allows us to make plans, form sentences, and do algebra.

The problems begin in that damned limbic system, the part of the midbrain that generates all those primitive emotions like fear, rage, and lust. If Freud had been a little less abstract, he might have interested himself in the limbic system. It's pretty powerful.

It's necessary too. We need fear and we need some hard wiring. Fear of snakes and heights may have helped us to survive, just as fear of a hungry predator did. Humans wouldn't be around if they didn't have a built-in fear of certain physical things and a tendency to fight to the death against physical threats.

But we're rarely faced with physical threats anymore. Few of us will be chased by ghouls or ogres except in nightmares. Instead we live in a world of symbols. Those symbols are all organized into a way of life that can be broadly defined as culture.

And as a couple of talking heads argue, we seem to have transferred our horror of physical threats to a fear response towards anything that threatens our culture. We can't flee from an alien ideology, so we hate it and try to eliminate it. "I'm not a white supremacist," shouts one demonstrator, "I'm a non-white exterminationist!"

Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out. That, in a nutshell, is how the cookie crumbles, according to this very necessary documentary.

I'm an anthropologist and in my view the writer, Mike Ramsdell, got the evolutionary part right. The idea isn't new. He could have gone farther. Charles Whitman, the mass murderer who shot more than a dozen people from the tower at the University of Texas, requested that his brain be examined after his death "to see if it had a tumor." It did, a small one, and it was nudging up against a part of his limbic system called the amygdala, which is associated with the fight or flight response.

There aren't many talking heads, though, if you don't count the many loonies that were perfectly happy to tell you how much they hate Jews, blacks, fags, and everybody else under the sun. Want to see a more focused example? Get hold of "California Reich." To me, the most horrifying scenes in this horrifying documentary are those in which young children are being taught to hate the same people their parents hate. It's positively unnerving to see a little boy of about five smiling and holding up a big sign about "Niggers" or trying desperately and eagerly to follow the lyrics of the song his mother is singing for him, about how all the "faggots" will go to hell.

I wish they'd had more talking heads or narration and had devoted a little less time to the traditional zanies that we've all come to know and love, like the highly vocal group that now disrupts the funerals of dead soldiers, chanting that the deaths were deserved because they are God's punishment for our tolerance of homosexuals. That's familiar stuff. I'd like to have heard more from people usually thought of as the victims of this hatred -- the Reverend Wright, for instance, who preached to his congregation "not God bless America, but God DAMN America." Hatred isn't reserved exclusively for white supremacists and the KKK.

There is one moment that touches on the universality of this lethal tribalism. An Israeli woman is being interviewed. Her husband was killed by a Palestinian sniper, and so was another close male relative, perhaps a son or a father. The interviewer allows her to finish her narrative of victimization, her lack of understanding of such hatred towards Jews. Then the interviewer comments, "But you kill Palestinians." There is a long and poignant pause while she thinks this over, before replying weakly, "Because they kill us."

"We kill them because they kill us." That, in another nutshell, is the cultural form this biological programming takes. No one ever started a war or a feud. It's always the other side. We're just defending our way of life from a symbolic threat to its existence. It's why we don't have a "War Department," only a "Department of Defense." In the last hour or so, some of the talking heads propose ways of short-circuiting this neuro-cultural cascade, but they sounded more wishful than convincing. How do you damp down the midbrain? It's like willing yourself to stop breathing.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Humanity is a disgrace but we have hope
absolutelycritical9 September 2011
If you haven't watched this documentary, what are you waiting for? We watch this every year at school and this year, we get to meet the director. My view of why people hate totally changed after watching this movie. As a woman of colour, I started seeing hateful people differently and they no longer make me angry, I just feel sorry for them. They don't know any better so they are threatened. The portrayal of hatred in this film is near perfect. The personification of this issue and looking into the eyes of these people really put the point across. I am looking forward to any future projects Mike Ramsdell has in store. The Anatomy of Hate is a masterpiece.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Thoughtful, Painful and Balanced
goldwriting5 January 2012
Watching the daily news each day, you could easily believe we live in a time increasingly overwhelmed by fear and hatred. We could easily slip into depression over the current direction of our governments, our politics and our people and a downward spiral would only lead us into more fear and more hatred.

For as long as there has been good, there has been bad. One cannot exist without the other, but that doesn't mean we cannot explore their definitions and what makes them tick. The more we understand about the two sides of the coin, the more we can help to influence which side is facing up when we look down upon our world.

The Anatomy of Hate: A Dialogue to Hope is an impressive and sometimes unforgiving documentary by Mike Ramsdell. He takes a balanced and unbiased look at where hate springs forth and what spurs it onward. Bravely walking into virtual lion's nests of right-wing fanatics, religious zealots and culture warriors, Ramsdell allows the viewer into the living room of "the enemy" (who might only be labeled as such because they feel the same about everyone else).

What sets this film apart from the array of past hate group documentaries is it makes a gallant attempt to get underneath the heated rhetoric and display some of the reasoning behind it. In some cases, such as the white supremacy groups, the reasoning is as flawed as you might imagine, but The Anatomy of Hate gives us a glimpse on how those cycles of hatred spin out of control in the tightly knit echo chambers of small communities. In the section detailing the infamous Westboro Baptist Church, the same logic applies since the congregation mainly consists of one single family.

The movie truly finds it legs in the section regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict that has been raging for years. In interwoven interviews, Ramsdell talks to a woman who lost her son and husband to Palestinian attacks in a very short period and then to young boys on the other side of the wall who believe the Israelis only goal is to wipe them off the planet. It becomes an unending spiral of "who killed who first" with repetitive and deadly repercussions.

Ramsdell also grounds these stories with interviews with various sociology and psychology professionals, who try to unravel the underpinnings to why these rivalries began and what keeps them fueled. One of the more poignant theories is that each of these groups, and many others, share a common fear of the loss of culture. Once we doomed ourselves by understanding our own mortality, we quickly created social contracts to ensure what we created won't disappear when we die. These groups live under a persistent panic that their culture will be wiped away into the annals of history if not immediately secured away from everyone else through secession or killing off those who challenge it.

This was a valid fear many years ago, but the world has moved on since then, yet these collected pockets hold themselves back like road bumps to evolution. They see the coming interconnected nature of the world population not as a bonus to understanding, but as a muddying of the waters from which they sprang.

The Anatomy of Hate ends on a positive note, focusing on stories of hope and change. Some of these include the very same culture warriors from earlier on, who once calmly spoke of destroying the enemy and the beauty of martyrdom, who now calmly preach dialogue as the true path forward to peace. These beautiful and necessary moments help end the film on a note of hope, a breath of clean air in polluted world of hate.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible film
cdale-836734 April 2017
This film is totally and unabashedly biased against Palestinians. They are portrayed as terrorists, period. It's the same old narrative that Jews are victims just defending themselves. There's NO appreciation for the history of Palestinian struggles to maintain their culture and homelands as the Jewish state was created. Really pathetic. And the glorification of the American military in Iraq is so sappy and nationalistic, so totally devoid of any coverage of the Iraqi people and culture - it's disgraceful. And covering Fred Phelps and his merry band of gay-haters? Come on. Give me a break! This minuscule segment of the American population is irrelevant - except if you want to give air time to sensationalist BS. The part of the film that's supposed to be about "dialog of hope" is so hokey it's unreal. Swelling music, and footage of allegedly redeemed people who have somehow moved beyond their previous prejudices. A bunch of trite supposedly feel-good clips cobbled together that are somehow about the possibility of moving beyond hate. Historical context and political realities are ignored. This is the worst kind of pseudo-liberal sophistry. I reviewed the film in hopes that I might use it to shed sociological light on hate groups. I was terribly disappointed and appalled at how shallow and biased it is.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed