Not for a moment would one blindly accept the claims made by Mr Searle yet, upon contemplation and consideration of the amount of circumstantial evidence such as the Warminster Mystery which I studied many years ago, and not withstanding that our "current" science doesn't offer a mainstream explanation for the phenomena but does not discount the possibility (Remember, we have far from answered some of the most fundamental questions of nature such as, what is driving the observed universal expansion). I can't on the one hand blindly accept the notion of "Dark Matter" as an explanation and then vehemently deny the possibility that an individual stumbled upon a secret of nature and investigated it with remarkable results. The more concerning issues Where is the open scientific investigation? Where is mainstream media interest in this fascinating documentary? Why is this not being shown in every cinema across the globe? Why are the scientific semi literate quick to attempt to debunk rather than genuinely inquire into the facts of such matters? If this is not true today then history tells us, it soon will be!
3 Reviews
A Suspect Film about Suspects
david-fisher263 January 2010
At first sight, one could be forgiven for thinking that this is a magnificent spoof in the style of 'Spinal Tap', with a cast of brilliant actors speaking the most outrageously ludicrous lines while keeping a straight face. Indeed, one somehow expects every dial in sight to be labelled up to 11.
The plot of the film also contains hints of 'Rain Man' in that the central character, Searl, is a sub-normal orphan who has a repetitive dream which shows him how to build a perpetual motion machine out of permanent magnets; quite contrary to the laws of physics. Not only that, but it unexpectedly turns out to be an anti-gravity machine as well (quite contrary to the laws of physics) and Searl loses no time in building his first flying saucer (out of wood, naturally). A fleet of 41 flying saucers is eventually built and tested by NASA and the US military. Somehow, this fails to impress anybody and most of the UFOs are sent into outer space 'for safety'; except perhaps for one which might possibly be stored in Archangel. Not all of these details are actually in the film. I have been doing some background research. And this is where the joke ends. All of this is supposed to be true, and it is not a spoof film, but a documentary. Suddenly, this puts a very different complexion on things. This is no longer a good-natured spoof, but a rather disquieting parade of people who are either mentally ill, or polished confidence tricksters. If the former, the film-makers have been exploitative. If the latter, they have aided the promotion of an investment scam. Because, of course, there is absolutely no proof that any of the claimed events ever took place. The SEG, the supposed perpetual motion machine, is seen only as a computer animation, and the 'evidence' for the flying saucers is as convincing as, well, that for any other UFO sighting. Even this would be borderline acceptable. However, Searl (who, incidentally has a long criminal record)continues to seek funding with which to 're-build' the devices that never existed in the first place. It may seem silly to equate Searl to Madoff but, in effect, they are cut from the same cloth, and one can quite easily imagine this film being used by a prosecuting lawyer as evidence in some future fraud trial.
The plot of the film also contains hints of 'Rain Man' in that the central character, Searl, is a sub-normal orphan who has a repetitive dream which shows him how to build a perpetual motion machine out of permanent magnets; quite contrary to the laws of physics. Not only that, but it unexpectedly turns out to be an anti-gravity machine as well (quite contrary to the laws of physics) and Searl loses no time in building his first flying saucer (out of wood, naturally). A fleet of 41 flying saucers is eventually built and tested by NASA and the US military. Somehow, this fails to impress anybody and most of the UFOs are sent into outer space 'for safety'; except perhaps for one which might possibly be stored in Archangel. Not all of these details are actually in the film. I have been doing some background research. And this is where the joke ends. All of this is supposed to be true, and it is not a spoof film, but a documentary. Suddenly, this puts a very different complexion on things. This is no longer a good-natured spoof, but a rather disquieting parade of people who are either mentally ill, or polished confidence tricksters. If the former, the film-makers have been exploitative. If the latter, they have aided the promotion of an investment scam. Because, of course, there is absolutely no proof that any of the claimed events ever took place. The SEG, the supposed perpetual motion machine, is seen only as a computer animation, and the 'evidence' for the flying saucers is as convincing as, well, that for any other UFO sighting. Even this would be borderline acceptable. However, Searl (who, incidentally has a long criminal record)continues to seek funding with which to 're-build' the devices that never existed in the first place. It may seem silly to equate Searl to Madoff but, in effect, they are cut from the same cloth, and one can quite easily imagine this film being used by a prosecuting lawyer as evidence in some future fraud trial.
This is the secret free energy that world leaders have been looking for.
elitebeast20 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
If you know who Nikola Tesla is then you will absolutely love this documentary. If you don't know who Nikola is then you are one of the brainwashed sheep that just follow what everyone else does. Nikola invented fluorescent lights bulbs which are better than Edisons light bulb, he invented a/c current which is better than d/c current. He invented radio not Marconi, he innovated a more efficient magnetic motor than Edison, he was the first to transmit wireless electricity. So why isn't it possible for someone else to have invented a free energy machine. All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
The "Dark Ages" last 1000 years and set science back with burning "witches at the stake" are scientist being held back by governments today?
The "Dark Ages" last 1000 years and set science back with burning "witches at the stake" are scientist being held back by governments today?
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
