Cowboys and Vampires (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
In the undead west
TheLittleSongbird19 April 2018
Like what was said recently with 'Cowboys vs Dinosaurs', watched 'Cowboys and Vampires' knowing exactly what to expect, with the title (a dead giveaway off the bat) and premise (though the set up was interesting somewhat) the film has. Was expecting it to be ridiculous and not particularly well made. Part of me was hoping though when watching out of curiosity that it would have a little entertainment value and be a small guilty pleasure.

'Cowboys and Vampires' (aka 'Dead West') was more or less what was expected, it is ridiculous and not well made at all. Would also be lying if said it is a good film, it is a long way from that and doesn't have anywhere near enough to make it a guilty pleasure though not unwatchable. There are worse films around, of the genre and overall, and the film at least knows what it's trying to be, not leaving me bored, not insulting my intelligence and having glimpses of a story (the set up is neat and the film starts reasonably decently).

Angelica Celaya is the film's bright spot, being appropriately vampish. The scenery is okay and there is some jauntiness and eeriness in the music when it's memorable (too often it's not).

Sadly, 'Cowboys and Vampires' is drably shot, with it also looking disorganised, and throughout it's incoherently edited, making it difficult to decipher what's going on in particularly the more action-oriented scenes (too few and not exciting or suspenseful).

The rest of the acting is very bad, especially from the conflict that ranges from pantomimic to somnambulist and the male lead was pretty wooden. The characters though in all fairness are not that interesting or easy to get behind, thanks to sketchy development and stupid character behaviours. The effects, make-up etc. are amateurish at best.

Writing is rambling and juvenile, while the direction is fairly characterless and while there is more story than expected it's a ridiculous one as well with very little tension or suspense. Things get over-the-top at the end and the campy silliness is taken to extreme levels that it becomes far-fetched.

On the whole, have seen worse but a pretty lame film. 3/10 Bethany Cox
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
brain dead
zeeblauw226 May 2012
The movie is centered in a town, once used to shoot westerns in, and now western shows are staged in it. Additionally, we follow the hero Johnny Dust doing an interview in a studio, and flashbacks from a movie he played in, with his hero and role model. Besides that, we see him having trouble with his ex-wife, and there is also his daughter, who thinks he is really cool. And there's a big bad conglomerate, that wants to raise the number of dwindling visitors by staging a ghost show during Halloween. The story contains story in story in story, which in itself is an interesting feat. But to do that well, you must have good a script, a good director and good editing. Good actors also help. As all are flawed, it just makes no sense now. The actors presumingly play bad as characters in the show, but unfortunately, they play equally bad in what supposedly is real life. The show stunts are blatantly fake, which is OK in itself, but here too, the "real" action is fake as well. Spectators of the show don't have clue what is real and what isn't. But we do neither. On top of that, a lot of things are not thought through: with a line in front of the ticket office, how much time would people take to chat with the ticket lady? Or, much time would they given by the people waiting in the cue? Would 6-year olds be allowed in a mine, designed as a ghost house? At least one little girl is in tears, one boy gets hurt: I can only imagine the lawsuits.... Even reading about this movie is a waste of time: I am really being kind giving it 2 stars. And that is mainly because of Gloria Valenzuela (actress Angélica Celaya). She is a convincing vampire, worthy of better than this.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Too simple
blumdeluxe18 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
"Dead West" tells the story of an actor working in a wild west park who finds himself in serious trouble when the park is taken over by vampires.

It is the old simple approach of taking two things everyone likes but that are not normally connected (cowboys and vampires) and just let them fight against each other. I promise this will never be the plot of a good movie. In this case the one thing you can say is that the movie is entertaining and doesn't bore you. On the other hand the acting is not always good, the poduction looks cheap at times and there are sequences (like these strange radio interviews) that I didn't simply understand. Maybe this was an attempt to be more artsy but if so it failed.

All in all I just think that you should put a bit more thought into your plot and the production. This movie too often chooses the easy way out instead of the clever one and it doesn't suit the production well.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
incredibly bad
alexpoy9827 October 2011
rarely i've seen such bad movies total waste of time, poor acting, poor script, poor director , in fact its plain garbage. what is more disturbing, is that in times of crisys , someone spends money on such way less than mediocre movies, just because the vampire genre is " popular" i guess if someone made movies with cowboys and aliens, with ninjas and aliens , with vampires and aliens.. why not a cowboys and vampires too? well , the answer is BECAUSE THEY SUCK if you do decide to go see this "masterpiece" be prepared to sleep, have serious brain damage , bite the neck of the one that recommended you this movie or just regret the time and money spent for less than nothing
31 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disgrace to Old Tucson's History! Don't waste your time or money.
drgntmr6 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
As much as I LOVED working for the original Old Tucson, this movie was HORRIBLE. It felt like a mockery of what Old Tucson USED to be. And I HATE the fact that they used actual footage of Old Tucson burning (Poor taste). It BROKE my heart. The writers of this monstrosity should be ashamed of themselves. The only good thing about it was the fact that some of the actors kept calling the show "Night Fall" (actual name of the night October shows), and not "Ghost Town" like what was written in the script.

There was rumors going around about putting new "attractions" into Old Tucson's property to attract more tourists after it burned. I hate the fact that they rebuilt a lot of the buildings on the property, but they resemble a modern type theme park. There was enough pictures and film/video footage that they could have built the facades to resemble what the town used to look like. What was once a "Most photographed" area ranked by Kodak, is now unrecognizable by fans of old westerns and TV shows pre '95 (year of the fire).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring
stujoe-887336 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Im just saying now it should be called movie star vs vampires cuz the guy is literaly an cowboy for movies also if u want to see him fight the vampires skip to the end cuz the whole movie is just a borefest for your information.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A lot better than anyone gives credit
punkinelf6 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I've read tons of reviews that were way off the mark, but I haven't commented. But ONE review for this movie? 1 star??? I have to doubt that the fifty or so that rated it never saw it.

The story and script are good, coherent and have character development. The acting is fine, with no "except for" retraction. The only stereotype was the lead's ex-wife. The production values are very high, and the cinematography rocks. Truly beautiful. Gorgeous Southern AZ vistas.

It's a tourist western set which is an actual tourist/studio, Old Tucson Studios, outside of Tucson. MANY westerns TV and movies were filmed there, so it would be a natural for this type of movie. This isn't a nostalgia movie, or a true western, vampire, horror movie. It tries to be more and in my estimation, it succeeds. Loved the many Day of the Dead elements in it. True to the setting and times.

So much of DEAD WEST is dead on southwest, vampire, horror, except for the **********SPOILER******** location of the Lost Dutchman mine. Whoever didn't like this movie is probably undead all ready.
7 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all
Ron-16927 May 2013
The movie dragged in places, but I thought it was a fairly good movie. Wade was a great leading man. I hope he gets more roles. The scenery, photography, and especially the soundtrack were all excellent. The script was pretty decent too. I just didn't like parts of the last ten minutes. if you are a fan of western films and have attended Western Film Festivals, it's probably more entertaining than if you haven't. The movie is set in Tucson AZ where western movies were filmed. That's where the breathtaking scenery originates. The Kid looks a lot like Sam Elliot. Wade looks a bit like Peter Fonda. Looks aside, the acting is good. For $10, it's an entertaining film. It isn't The Magnificent Seven, but it's a good film.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed