I'm a sucker for import horror. British horror is usually enjoyable. "Gnaw", "Don't let him in", "Collin" etc. are all gems. Is this a classic? Far from it. It's shot on what looks like video. Vaguely reminds me of another micro budget "Cannibal Campout". The storyline is a bit slow in the start. Drinking and arguing. But after the 40 minute mark things get going. If you can look past it's two dollar budget you might enjoy it for what it is. I'm generally more forgiving as I've seen some real Turkeys. This isn't all that bad compared to the crud I've sloughed through despite it's micro budget.
7 Reviews
I wanted to like this film, I really did.
matthewhemmings11 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
After 52 minutes I shouted at the screen "just start killing them already." There was not enough gore to fill a 30 second TV advert in the whole film.
The audio is literally all over the shop. You can't hear the characters and then some ominous music blasts through your ear drums (ominous music when nothing is actually happening most of the time, incidentally).
This film drags on and on. As do the characters (or rather they drone on and on).
As a big horror fan I am no stranger to stupid decisions made by characters, but to give the smallest girl the only car keys and the only weapon? To let her run off by herself to 'get tools' without freeing the others first? To then sit around and bicker/argue about your love lives while chains are around your ankles and one guy has a finger missing? For f*cks sake.
Let me give you one more example. In Sin City when Marv goes to the shop to get some razor wire the scene lasts about 20 seconds and is very cool/punchy. When the killer here goes to the shop it takes at least five minutes (though it feels like longer) for him to buy some duct tape, cable ties and a roll of something (the whole scene replete with that ominous music, of course).
I don't review many films on here at all, but the one review posted giving this 8/10 and calling it "entertaining, edge of your seat stuff" (apparently you don't just see that on box covers) compelled me to.
I wanted to like this film, I like horror I like indie projects and I want British cinema to do well. But this? Avoid it. Avoid it like the f*cking plague.
The audio is literally all over the shop. You can't hear the characters and then some ominous music blasts through your ear drums (ominous music when nothing is actually happening most of the time, incidentally).
This film drags on and on. As do the characters (or rather they drone on and on).
As a big horror fan I am no stranger to stupid decisions made by characters, but to give the smallest girl the only car keys and the only weapon? To let her run off by herself to 'get tools' without freeing the others first? To then sit around and bicker/argue about your love lives while chains are around your ankles and one guy has a finger missing? For f*cks sake.
Let me give you one more example. In Sin City when Marv goes to the shop to get some razor wire the scene lasts about 20 seconds and is very cool/punchy. When the killer here goes to the shop it takes at least five minutes (though it feels like longer) for him to buy some duct tape, cable ties and a roll of something (the whole scene replete with that ominous music, of course).
I don't review many films on here at all, but the one review posted giving this 8/10 and calling it "entertaining, edge of your seat stuff" (apparently you don't just see that on box covers) compelled me to.
I wanted to like this film, I like horror I like indie projects and I want British cinema to do well. But this? Avoid it. Avoid it like the f*cking plague.
Blimey, this is a truly, horrendously bad film...
kevcoe7 April 2019
Seriously. It is one of the very worst films I've ever seen. And God knows, I've seen some stinkers. The funny thing is that some of those 'stinkers' might have had something about them that might be enjoyable... cheesy lines, a laughable (but amusing) plot, hilariously bad special effects, whatever. But this is a film that has absolutely no redeeming features whatsoever.
It's amateur hour throughout despite the two main actresses having a bunch of TV / movie credits between them. The first hour just looks like people making stuff up as they go along, improvising like crazy and not doing a good job of it. Not a single interesting line or character-making idea throughout. And when the supposed 'horror' stuff comes along... that's even less interesting. The camerawork is often so bad that I truly couldn't understand what was going on (someone got assaulted? Who was it? No idea...). Almost no gore for the 'gorehounds' (let's face it, the target audience for a film of this title) and... well, I've run out of words why this film is so bad.
I love to support low-budget UK cinema but I can't support this POS. Sorry.
It's amateur hour throughout despite the two main actresses having a bunch of TV / movie credits between them. The first hour just looks like people making stuff up as they go along, improvising like crazy and not doing a good job of it. Not a single interesting line or character-making idea throughout. And when the supposed 'horror' stuff comes along... that's even less interesting. The camerawork is often so bad that I truly couldn't understand what was going on (someone got assaulted? Who was it? No idea...). Almost no gore for the 'gorehounds' (let's face it, the target audience for a film of this title) and... well, I've run out of words why this film is so bad.
I love to support low-budget UK cinema but I can't support this POS. Sorry.
Appallingly bad
Leofwine_draca16 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
YOUNG, HIGH AND DEAD is an appallingly bad British indie horror flick directed in the worst and cheapest way imaginable. The whole thing screams cheap and tawdry, with visuals marred by fake grindhouse-style print damage and a weird old fashioned, silent film-style flickering effect that renders the whole thing all but unwatchable. The plot is much like that of SHROOMS, with some unpleasant characters heading into the woods for some drug-fuelled fun but finding something nasty instead. It's slow and boring for the most part, laughably gruesome and overwrought at the climax. You do wonder what two well-established TV stars, Hannah Tointon and Louisa Lytton, were doing appearing in this.
Soap stars slumming it.
BA_Harrison10 July 2018
Graduating from TV to movies is often seen as progress for an actor or actress, but not when the film in question is a cheap piece of amateurish crud like Young, High and Dead.
Eastenders babes Hannah Tointon and Louisa Lytton play Katy and Jenny, who go camping for the weekend with their boyfriends and gooseberry Gary (Nigel Boyle), unknowingly pitching their tents a stone's throw from where a paedo serial killer has been burying the dismembered bodies of his victims. After spending the evening hoovering up lines of coke and smoking the weed, the campers pass out for the night, waking to find that their legs have been shackled, and they are now at the mercy of the killer.
The plot for this lame slasher is uninspired, the camerawork is lousy, the sound is dreadful, and the acting perfunctory, but it is the pacing that makes it a real test of endurance, with most of the first hour consisting of dull banter, drunken rambling, bickering, and endless scenes of drinking and drug use that really drag. None of this really qualifies as character development since we learn very little of interest about the group.
At around the sixty minute mark, the killer finally appears to threaten the fivesome, at which point the film resorts to extreme wobbly cam that makes it hard to follow what is happening-not that it matters too much: there's zero tension or gore, and I couldn't have cared less who got killed or not.
1/10 - Young, High and Dead is utter cack!
Eastenders babes Hannah Tointon and Louisa Lytton play Katy and Jenny, who go camping for the weekend with their boyfriends and gooseberry Gary (Nigel Boyle), unknowingly pitching their tents a stone's throw from where a paedo serial killer has been burying the dismembered bodies of his victims. After spending the evening hoovering up lines of coke and smoking the weed, the campers pass out for the night, waking to find that their legs have been shackled, and they are now at the mercy of the killer.
The plot for this lame slasher is uninspired, the camerawork is lousy, the sound is dreadful, and the acting perfunctory, but it is the pacing that makes it a real test of endurance, with most of the first hour consisting of dull banter, drunken rambling, bickering, and endless scenes of drinking and drug use that really drag. None of this really qualifies as character development since we learn very little of interest about the group.
At around the sixty minute mark, the killer finally appears to threaten the fivesome, at which point the film resorts to extreme wobbly cam that makes it hard to follow what is happening-not that it matters too much: there's zero tension or gore, and I couldn't have cared less who got killed or not.
1/10 - Young, High and Dead is utter cack!
My Review Of 'Young, High And Dead"
ASouthernHorrorFan20 September 2013
"Young, High And Dead" is a UK indie horror film by directors Luke Brady, Jonathan Brady, Daniel Fenton and Thabo Mhlatshwa. The film stars Hannah Tointon, Louisa Lytton, Philip Barantini, Matthew Stathers, Nigel Boyle, David Partridge, Su Elliott and follows a group of 20-something friends on a weekend camping trip to celebrate the pending nuptials of one couple. "Young, High And Dead" is a contemporary thriller that builds with a slow, steady slice of life anchored by an ominous realization of "wrong place, wrong place" (yeah I meant to type it that way!). The story is a blend of two classic horror archetypes. There is the traditional slasher, bloodbath in the woods element that is wrapped with a more modern aspect of survival from the psycho residents, together the two story elements provide a very haunting and foreboding atmosphere to the film.
The things that I liked about "Young, High And Dead" are select and not necessarily connected to the horror aspect of the film. The soundtrack was produced well and offered a creepy, steady stream of unease through the story. The acting is standard Brit quality acting with the characters seeming believable and effectual. It is very seldom that British indie film or television offer bad acting-it does happen but it isn't as often as their American contemporaries. The film quality in "Young, High And Dead" is pretty quality as well with a lot of perspective and emotion being offered through a visually surreal style. It is clear that film making is what the crew behind "Young, High And Dead" are meant to be doing. The story is a nice modern tale that offers urban legend, creepy campfire tale, and faux-warning for city folk to stay in the city. "Young, High And Dead" does a very good job of giving fans a cool story filled with melodrama and chilling suspense while setting up a very brutal turn of events. Even the horror aspect (when it finally happens) gives us some much expected thrills and blood.
Now for the things that I didn't like about the film, and there are a couple. I didn't like that it took nearly 50 minutes for anything really interesting to happen in the film. Most of that time was spent on set-up story parts and character building that tends to drag on far longer than necessary. I began to question whether or not to finish the film. A lot of the two story aspects of the film where justified and helped to provide an emotional connection with the characters while setting up the series of events from start to finish. I just felt that a lot could have been left out. I got the characters around twenty minutes into the story and I understood how damaged the protagonist was within the first fifteen so a lot of the scenes could have been shorter, flashback moments. By the time the real guts of the story unfold ( the blood and horror) it is almost too late. I said almost. When the crap really hits the fan in this little horror film it really hits. The action and chilling last twenty or so minutes of the film is intense and nail- biting. It almost makes up for the first hour or so of over-indulgence in character building and melodrama.
"Young, High And Dead" may take a bit too long to get to the action and thrills but when it finally does happen it is entertaining, edge-of- your-set excitement. The story is worth watching as an Indie film but if you are a die-hard horror fan who wants mostly intense action-packed bloodshed then you will be frustrated with this film. I begged and found myself actually counting down till the final moments-longing for some gore. The acting isn't cheesy or over-the-top which is a plus, the tone stays more mature and serious through the film even with the fun, drug induced banter of the characters which one must have in a horror film. That I liked a lot. Nothing more annoying than over acting, that does more to make for a bad viewing experience where too much camp is a bad thing. "Young, High And Dead" is more of a sleepy thriller that ends on a high, brutal note.
The things that I liked about "Young, High And Dead" are select and not necessarily connected to the horror aspect of the film. The soundtrack was produced well and offered a creepy, steady stream of unease through the story. The acting is standard Brit quality acting with the characters seeming believable and effectual. It is very seldom that British indie film or television offer bad acting-it does happen but it isn't as often as their American contemporaries. The film quality in "Young, High And Dead" is pretty quality as well with a lot of perspective and emotion being offered through a visually surreal style. It is clear that film making is what the crew behind "Young, High And Dead" are meant to be doing. The story is a nice modern tale that offers urban legend, creepy campfire tale, and faux-warning for city folk to stay in the city. "Young, High And Dead" does a very good job of giving fans a cool story filled with melodrama and chilling suspense while setting up a very brutal turn of events. Even the horror aspect (when it finally happens) gives us some much expected thrills and blood.
Now for the things that I didn't like about the film, and there are a couple. I didn't like that it took nearly 50 minutes for anything really interesting to happen in the film. Most of that time was spent on set-up story parts and character building that tends to drag on far longer than necessary. I began to question whether or not to finish the film. A lot of the two story aspects of the film where justified and helped to provide an emotional connection with the characters while setting up the series of events from start to finish. I just felt that a lot could have been left out. I got the characters around twenty minutes into the story and I understood how damaged the protagonist was within the first fifteen so a lot of the scenes could have been shorter, flashback moments. By the time the real guts of the story unfold ( the blood and horror) it is almost too late. I said almost. When the crap really hits the fan in this little horror film it really hits. The action and chilling last twenty or so minutes of the film is intense and nail- biting. It almost makes up for the first hour or so of over-indulgence in character building and melodrama.
"Young, High And Dead" may take a bit too long to get to the action and thrills but when it finally does happen it is entertaining, edge-of- your-set excitement. The story is worth watching as an Indie film but if you are a die-hard horror fan who wants mostly intense action-packed bloodshed then you will be frustrated with this film. I begged and found myself actually counting down till the final moments-longing for some gore. The acting isn't cheesy or over-the-top which is a plus, the tone stays more mature and serious through the film even with the fun, drug induced banter of the characters which one must have in a horror film. That I liked a lot. Nothing more annoying than over acting, that does more to make for a bad viewing experience where too much camp is a bad thing. "Young, High And Dead" is more of a sleepy thriller that ends on a high, brutal note.
I Love This Indie British Film
frederickzabala199424 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I Watch this last year and i love it despite being Low Budget and had wonderful female cast member Louisa Lytton (who is one of my British Love Platonic in the U.K) and Hannah Tointon
i also love the plot of the film: 5 friends (2 couples and a Single Guy) going to the wood for the weekend unknown to them that there's a serial Killer lurking in the wood who's also a Pedophile and i love the scene near the end (WARNING SPOILER)in which John get run over by a car driven by Jenny with Blood Splatter in the front car which is a reference to a scene in Robocop (1987)
Louisa Lytton is a wonderful actress and a hot one she's great playing Final Girl in the film i wish to meet her someday when i travel to U.K
My Review 7/10
i also love the plot of the film: 5 friends (2 couples and a Single Guy) going to the wood for the weekend unknown to them that there's a serial Killer lurking in the wood who's also a Pedophile and i love the scene near the end (WARNING SPOILER)in which John get run over by a car driven by Jenny with Blood Splatter in the front car which is a reference to a scene in Robocop (1987)
Louisa Lytton is a wonderful actress and a hot one she's great playing Final Girl in the film i wish to meet her someday when i travel to U.K
My Review 7/10
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
