Sweet Prudence and the Erotic Adventure of Bigfoot (2011) User Reviews

Actually funny

[kosmasp · 6/10 · 2 August 2014]

Have to admit this was better than I expected. You will get the "erotic" part, if you worry about that, but this was actually decent as a movie itself. Normally those movies tend to be just silly, but not in a good sense, this one kind of had the comedy vibe to it and was able to pull that off.

Not sure if I would call the "acting" good in that sense, but mostly the sense of timing was met and the movie did deliver. A lot of nudity obviously and a lot of "shaking" going on too, but that is something you can expect when reading the description. The emotional touch to it, that's something you might not expect.

Good For Its Type

[Michael_Elliott · 25 November 2012]

Sweet Prudence & The Erotic Adventure of Bigfoot (2011)

** (out of 4)

Prudence (Angie Bates) and her girlfriend are making out in a lake one night when they notice Bigfoot watching them. The next day she gets the idea of making a good grade by capturing a photo of the creature so that's what she sets out to do. If you're looking for an art-house flick or some sort of Oscar-winner then it would be best to avoid this thing. This is just your typical softcore effort and for its genre the film actually isn't too bad. I think there's a lot of funny stuff here as long as you're not easily offended but then again, if you were that type why would you be watching a movie with this title? Much of the sex stuff was childish but this is why it was so funny. There are several scenes where Bigfoot is spying on the naked women and there are several shots of his erection, which is just funny. I'm sorry but it made me laugh. There's even a masturbation sequence and an "ending" that is certainly very memorable. Another good thing is that we've got plenty of cute girls who are obviously naked throughout. I'm not going to call any of the performances great but I thought they were all good enough for this type of film and better than you'd normally see. Bates is especially good in the lead and you certainly won't forget what she's doing in Scotland while others are looking at the Loch Ness monster.

Awful

[writekpetersen · 1/10 · 9 March 2018]

Terrible movie with no laughs, entertainment, nothing interesting, no redeeming value at all. Every single thing about this "movie" is flawed. Awful lighting, really bad sound, terrible acting, you would think it is at least funny in a way you can laugh at it for being so bad but it's not, it's just very tedious and boring. The girls are not funny. The guy playing Bigfoot Daniel Moshe Johnson is so bad he even sucks without having any lines at all. Glad to see he has no other credits to his name. Just a truly awful movie.

Sleazy fun....

[CurtHerzstark · 29 June 2012]

Ever wanted to see a softporn/sexcomedy featuring the legendary cryptid Bigfoot(also known as Sasquatch)? Look no further because this film contains this and so much more!

This is very silly, softporn feature, with incredible stupid storyline. It is about this girl and her friend who decides to travel to summer resort owned by a hippie, where Bigfoot has been sighted.

But will they be able to capture Bigfoot on film? And are they the only ones looking for Bigfoot? And will they be able to get laid?

This is a surprisingly well directed soft porn film, with few pacing problems, some pretty lowbrow comedy skits that sometimes work. And of course features lots of nudity and fake sex scenes.

If there are an uncut hardcore version out there, I have not been able to see it. The casting is pretty good, but remember this being a softporn film with lowbrow comedy, and with a very silly intrigue, future viewers shouldn't look for Oscar winning performances and instead just enjoy the naked bodies.

And with 4 lovely girls like Albina Hussain, Angie Bates, Lynzey Patterson, Heather O'Donnell spending majority of the film naked, one shouldn't complain.

Director William Burke seems to have picked girls with fairly natural bodies, without many cosmetic surgeries, and that came as surprise for me. This more natural approach makes the film look more like softporn from 1970's, 80's then any reminiscent of hardcore porn of today.

The film seems to been shot on a shoestring budget, reusing the same locations, the bigfoot costume looking like cheap halloween outfit, bad audio, etc.

But director William Burke manages to squeeze most out of his actors anyway, especially from the girls. From Angie Bates upbeat, perky character, Albina Hussains perfect posed coolness, Heather O'Donnells hippie chick with serenity, to Lynzey Patterson horny vixen.

Another surprise is Luke Gallos comedic relief in form of cryptozoologist Dirk. He is sometimes very funny, and delivers some genuinely comedic moments in this film.

Michael Slade is the cool, good looking hunk, and I suppose a lot of girls will find his appearances here exciting.

But after all this is softporn, with lots of sex scenes, which I found slightly monotonous and boring. Mainly because is not hardcore, and story isn't that good to begin with, and thus at times the viewer may find themselves bored with watching yet another girl on girl encounter.

However William Burke seems to know how to direct, and his cast had a good chemistry. Therefore I wish he would do another film but with a space theme, just like Galaxina (1980), Barbarella (1968).

So, future viewers that likes softporn, and don't mind a crude lowbrow comedy approach, featuring some natural beauties, should watch this film.