"Inside No. 9" The Trial of Elizabeth Gadge (TV Episode 2015) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Pemberton and Shearsmith offer up a welcome diversion from the norm
The-Last-Prydonian11 April 2015
The latest offering from Messrs Pemberton and Shearsmith, the first-period piece they have produced and likely inspired by the classic Hammer Horror movies of yore. Entitled The Trial of Elizabeth Gadge It's safe to say that one of Its potential chief influences is The Witchfinder General (1968). The setting is 17th Century England, and magistrate Sir Andrew Pike (David Warner) welcomes two witch-finders, the fanatical zealot Mr. Warren (Reece Shearsmith) and the more moderate, conscientious Mr. Clarke (Steve Pemberton) to the small village of Little Happens (A fitting ironic title given the nature of what occurs during the episode). They have been summoned to the small community as local widower Elizabeth Gadge stands accused of Witchcraft, her accusers being her own daughter Sarah (Sinead Matthews) and her son-in-law Thomas Nutter (Jim Howick).

As the trial goes underway it becomes lamentably apparent that the odds are unjustly stacked against her, with it descending into a farcical circus as Mr. Warren co-presides over matters with chilling, single-minded zeal! But startling revelations come to the attention of the court which may tip the odds in Mrs. Gadge's favor.

A welcome entry in the anthology series, The Trial of Elizabeth Gadge is to some extent a sublime indictment of the unethical, ideological evils that existed in the 17th Century due to religious fervor. This is wonderfully mirrored in the contrasting nature of the story's two principal characters, with Pemberton's Mr. Clarke embodying a 21st Century perspective as to how we as viewers would perceive the more skewered morals of the age. Shearsmith is appropriately chilling in the role of Mr. Warren affecting a sinister monotone delivery of his lines. A stark contrast to Mr. Clarke's more temperate nobility and conviction invoked in Pemberton's performance.

The absurdity of the events is deftly handled during the trial scene which is underpinned by the sparse moments of black humor as it descends into farce. The local villagers seemingly being primitive yokels whose sole purpose at the hearing is to gawk, boo and hiss during proceedings as if they were on a post-revolutionary version of The Jeremy Kyle Show. A wonderful cast of supporting actors offers able support with old-pro David Warner as the congenial and eccentric Sir Andrew Pike, a man who may very well have an amusing inclination of a sexual nature that is questionable, to say the least. Also, cult comedian/actor Paul Kaye is on hand whose own past history in black comedy is perfectly suited as an addition to the cast.

Ultimately though this is one of Pemberton and Shearsmiths finest half hours in terms of their performances as they effortlessly complement one another. It's only in the story's denouement that the supposed surprise twist (although I didn't see it coming) falls short of being genuinely shocking or revelatory! It feels somewhat tacked on as an afterthought as both writers were left hard-pressed to wrap up things sufficiently. Never the less The Trial of Elizabeth Gadge makes for a refreshing adage to the series. It's by no means Pemberton and Shearsmith at the height of their innovative powers. But as a solid way to spend half an hour of your time, it is a mainly rewarding experience only marred by its somewhat anti-climactic denouement.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not just going through the potions
southdavid19 July 2021
With some nods to the "League of Gentlemen's Apocalypse" Steve Pemberton and Reece Shearsmith reunite with David Warner for story set during the witch trials of the 17th Century.

Two witchfinders, Mr. Warren (Reece Shearsmith) and Mr. Clarke (Steve Pemberton) arrive in the town of Little Happens, to adjudge on the case of Elizabeth Gadge (Ruth Sheen). Though Mr Warren remains brutally committed to proving guilt at all opportunities, Mr Clarke is beginning to wonder if they are doing more harm than good, particularly with this case, where the accusers seem to have an ulterior motive for their allegation.

After the depth of the previous episode, The Trial of Elizabeth Gadge sees much more of a return to traditional comedy, with David Warner enjoying himself immensely as Little Happen's town elder, fascinated and more than a little excited about the prospect of the witch finders in his town. He's joined in the episode by Paul Kaye, playing the chief witness, who also has his own issue with the accused. And also "Horrible Histories" and "Ghosts" star Jim Howick, who along with his wife, played by Sinead Matthews, are the primary complainants. All give great performances along with Sheen, who shines as the titular role.

It's a very funny episode with Warner stealing it with his perverted character. I enjoyed the double twist ending though I feel it might have gone a stage further, and made it clear that the Gadge family had targeted the witch finders from the beginning. Still, another excellent episode.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bewitched
safenoe2 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This episode of Inside No. 9 has a double twist at the end, which will make your neck twist as it did for one of the characters who met a tragic fate at the end. This episode isn't for everyone, particularly those with more contemporary tastes, but still.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Witchsmeller Pursuivant
eppingdrwho29 January 2020
This very witty episode has echoes of an episode from The Blackadder. It also presents the villagers in a fashion like those seen in Maid Marian and her Merry-Men. Fun times.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Burn the witch!
norxilla7 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I know how passionate they were about writing a period piece, and you can tell by how well the script is written. I'm not that big a fan of period pieces, but this one did a good job. It uses the odd language and phrases they would use and plays around to make them comical. The absurdity is always played up at any opportunity, it has elements of Monty Python, but has their own brand of unique atmosphere and pacing. The pace is well-balanced, with monologues, multiple characters having a quick back and forth and rising uneasiness or laughter among the mob. It's exploration of mob culture can sometimes be related to modern day. Pretty sad.

Ultimately, I think the script is an excellent examples of well-written dialogue, very poetic, as it takes from the language of the time. Lots of research and existing passion must have been involved in this episode to get things as accurate as they should be. Some juxtaposition with modern elements is essential to the comedy, but also simply taking things that would be considered utterly ridiculous and archaic now lends itself to comedy.

This is the first of the episodes to do a double twist. We as the audience believe we know what the outcome will be, no matter what, the witch is going to get burned. It is sewn throughout that she is innocent, as the accusers all have something personal to gain from her death. When it is revealed, Clarke betrays his colleague, that is seen as the big twist. However, the woman actually turning out to be a witch is a fun little counter twist to quickly end the episode, even if a bit predictable. Period pieces and historical fiction isn't really my cup of tea so I found it difficult to get fully invested. But this is a enjoyable and beautifully written episode. Special mention to David Warner as Pike, he absolutely killed the role.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A fantastic black comedy
Sleepin_Dragon15 October 2017
Elizabeth Anne Gadge stands accused of witchcraft and sorcery, two witch finders are called in to put her on trial.

This is wonderfully black humour, a mix of absurd laugh out loud moments and dark goings on. The script is brilliant, it's so slick, fortunately the actors deliver their lines beautifully. David Warner delivers some hilarious lines, all with a straight face, he's so natural. Shearsmith and Pemberton are so serious, you'd hardly know they were doing comedy. The ever wonderful Ruth Sheen is brilliant as Gadge, such an underrated actress, capable of straight drama and comedy.

It's particularly well produced, somewhat in the form of a seventies horror movie, fabulous costumes, a great set, and excellent music.

A great episode. 9/10
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Witching half-hour
greenf7430 April 2015
Absolutely everybody noticed the influence of "Witchfinder General" on this lively half-hour, and it could hardly be missed. What's surprising is that no-one seems to have mentioned the equally obvious influence of Arthur Miller's play "The Crucible", which has been filmed a couple of times, or Aldous Huxley's book, "The Devils Of Loudun", which was the basis of John Whiting's play "The Devils" and its 1971 movie version directed by Ken Russell. These are not exactly obscure or little- known works, after all! The notion that the tiny village of Little Happens will grow prosperous as a result of a witchcraft trial (it may, we are told with a straight face, even change its name to Much Happens) is taken direct from Huxley. This is not to deny the brilliance of the Pemberton-Shearsmith script, with its characteristic mixture of the absurd (this episode has perhaps the most outrageously silly jokes of the second season) and the terrifying (Shearsmith's admirably serious performance). All the actors, indeed, maintain perfect balance between the two extremes. Incidentally, the very end of the story shows a rather less distinguished influence - that of the "vampire" episode of "Dr. Terror's House Of Horrors".
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great and unique episode
geeboy379 January 2021
I've now watched about a season and a half of this and have to say this episode is one of the best. Its such a perfect blend of humor and occasional drama that it leaves you feeling extremely fulfilled. This show in general is great but thus far this was the only episode that made me want to write a review.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Some thoughts on why I believe it's lower rated
kennytran-2104722 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I am shocked to see "The Trial ..." is one of the lower rated of Inside No 9. I have some thoughts on why this might be.

This episode has a lot going for it: it might be the funniest episode on the whole damn show ("ecstasy...") and it has a hateful villain who gets his comeuppance. But all of this is tempered with the downbeat ending - that Gadge was in fact a witch. Indeed, the ending is much more of a gut punch than it seems on the surface, because this also means that the bloodthirsty Warren and greedy villagers were after all correct! This is all hard to stomach because it basically turns the theme into "sometimes prosecuting someone without care for truth can still be the right thing" which is obviously hard to accept. I don't think the people watching the ep will be conscious of this fact; instead, they'll just believe it's one of the weaker "meh" episodes because of how "off" the ending feels. I also don't believe that Reece and Steve were going for this when they were writing it. They were most likely just trying to add in one more twist, not realizing the thematic effect on the whole episode that twist would have.

"The Trial of Elizabeth Gadge" is interesting to me because it shows the power of theme. It matters and you should always know what you're saying. And that people will respond to it even if they don't consciously know it.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed