Before the Dark (2017) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Pretty Terrible, Unfortunately
tabuno8 January 2019
21 November 2017. This low budget sci fi movie is about the possible teleportation of people, an essential way to save some from the end of the world. While the quality of the photography along with the soundtrack was decent enough, the beginning scene followed by the next scene made it difficult to follow the story and even though there is an attempt to reconnect later in the movie, it just adds to the confusion. There is no character development in the movie and it's hard to be sympathetic with any of the movie's characters or their relationships, motivations, most of their plans, or intentions. The acting by the African American security personnel was flat and without emotional sincerity and the podcast guy also doesn't seem to have a screen presence, a portrayal that offers a sense of theatrical personality that can grab an audience's interest. Some of the dialogue in the movie just seems to be read from a script that doesn't really ring true without an emotional connection and are just strung together resulting in a blunted affect.

By the fifth way through the movie, the inclusion of the President and his small contingent seem more and more to be artificial that reeks of a limited budget for the film. In one scene where the President and his two aides enters into a secret experiment the movie becomes quite unbelievable and almost unwatchable in terms of suspending one's belief in what is going on in the movie. The aides later presence in the movie seems also ludicrous and out of place without explanation. Later there is one scene with two guys that the audience has no idea what they talking about and what if anything they have to do with the movie. Additionally, the threat to the planet based on current science and everyday experience also seems so bizarre as to be unbelievable, making the movie all that much harder to watch because of how the scriptwriter set up the entire story without being able to resolve the matter in an acceptable manner. The script just seems so haphazard and made up as to be more a bunch of foolish ideas than a real story, including a number of out-moded clichés of personal sacrifice and integrity, like a poor soap opera. There is even an unexpected, unexpected pregnancy that just comes out of nowhere from a more confusing union including the idea of memory wipes even as the nature of the movie remains still out of reach of most audience members more than half way through the movie.

By the two-thirds way into the movie, the reveal is offered up and the low-budget nature of the film really shows through as the movie's credible concept is offered up without a convincing style or flourish, but with dull, hyper-dramatics transforming the movie into more of a thriller than science fiction or the more terrifying death throes of an entire planet or solar system. From the a rather incongruous change in personality occurs with some of the characters in order to adhere to the American ending of the movie. Perhaps the best thing about the movie is its title "Before the Dark." But really it needed a better writer and director and/or cast it's difficult to tell. Finally, there is a cute last shot of a building with a quite recognizable name of it for those that manage to get through the movie. Sadly, upon reflection, this movie could have been a really great movie with more patient attention to screen writing. Interestingly, this a one of the few movies that a second viewing might be worthwhile. Much better alternatives would be Peter Fonda's low budget effort in Idaho Transfer (1973) that offers up a much more credible and eerie presentation worthy watching, his second of only three pictures he ever directed or Journey to the Far Side of the Sun (1969) starring Roy Thinnes about an astronaut who finds himself on a similar but strange planet.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It's a stinker
Snootz23 July 2019
I appreciate diversity in taste. Despite that, it's difficult to imagine someone legitimately considering this a "good movie". There are plot holes enough to sink a starship. What should be a relatively simple concept is presented in a manner so confusing and counter-intuitive many viewers won't really have figured out what happened by the end (some will... but likely won't be impressed). I can't go into details without spoilers. Suffice that this is poor writing, poor directing, and doesn't even qualify as a mediocre fan film. It's not Asylum bad, but close to it.

Bad camera angles, predictable characters, nonsensical plot elements and really bad science are topped off by a goofy ending pulled out of a 3rd grade fiction assignment. It's not a terrible movie, but far from good. Worth watching? Not if you're a true sci-fi fan and value your time.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sheesh!
jscottstewart5 December 2021
Maybe some of the actors are better than what appears on the screen, but, honestly, the writer and director gave them absolutely nothing to work with. And the editor just made things worse. Possibly a good story in this, but you wouldn't know it from what they delivered.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good movie
emrssp18 August 2018
It's an interesting plot and it surprised me on the way. It's somehow a simple movie (in a question of production), but with all the positive aspects of being simple, no appealing scenes or trendy behaviours just to get the audience's affection.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Don't listen to the negative reviews
vicky_renee10 April 2022
This was actually decent.

Yeah, bad acting, cheesy in a way, but it was still worth watching.

The concept is actually a good idea and should be used in movies, but with more intensity and more people involved.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I didnt expect to like this movie...
macdautle21 June 2023
...but it was actually interesting and kept my attention despite the -obviously- low budget. The concept was novel; however, it was very hard to follow what was happening for most of the movie. It came together in the end, so I will say there was a satisfying enough payoff.

The acting wasn't wooden but it wouldn't win any Oscars either. Good enough to make you wonder what happened next but that was about it.

Script was okay - advanced the film well enough, but the direction and settings was mediocre. Special effects were kept to a minimum. Definitely worth a watch but not necessarily a second one.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's okay
edgy-827-48696512 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
At one point its amateurish in how it made, have some obviously visual flaws (like why dad and president trio and others don't get old? at one moment I even don't understand that's 20 years later!), but film was shoot seriously and looks like mediocre tv-movie. Plot is interesting, dialogs - not bad. Sometimes Ryan Quinn Adams act like he is in school play, its really off-bit, and his "daughter" not good to. But in all - its a good humanitarian science fiction. P.S. Well its not SO humanitarian. At the end his father made some strange thing. Like he just save 5 men, and then delete program and left all millions of people to die. Nice!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An interesting concept, let down by poor acting
polo_kings12 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The story and conceit behind this film are rather interesting, the sun is dying, an inventor create a machine send people to another planet light years away, but when they get there it's inhabited. Sadly the actors in this film are soldier than Edwood woodwood.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed