You'll see a plethora of negative reviews for this one. Most stating it was incoherent and didn't make any sense. Personally I've always felt if done right, it's a good element to have in a horror film. Many Italian horror films lack coherency and focus on being more surreal and non-linear.
"Boogeyman" isn't exactly in this vein but just slightly and it's far from a horror masterpiece, but it isn't the conventional standard 'horror' flick manufactured by Hollywood either. The score is really well composed which compliments many of the atmospheric moments this film has to offer.
The first 30 minutes I found to be quite unsettling. I can relate to being in the bed in the dark looking at something across the room that resembles someone standing there looking at you. We've all been there. What happens in this movie is exactly what we've always feared that something would do.
Moments like these really stood out.
The middle isn't as strong as the beginning or even the confusing ending but the entire film has an unsettling feel about it. Never a joyous moment. There are a lot of flashy camera movements which have gained a popularity amongst most horror films these days. Honestly I'm not a big fan of these MTV style techniques. Ultimately it's the main factor in why I felt it could have been a better film. I can take a certain amount of it but this movie just had a bit too much of it. And every time the dude touched a door knob you just knew there was going to be a noisy flashback sequence. Also, I'm not sure if I can take anymore little kids trying to be all creepy and scary in horror films. It's cliché' and frankly I'm a little sick of it.
At one point I started to wonder how the boogeyman played into all of this other than the precredit sequence. There seemed to be a great deal of possible psychic phenomena within the central character and none of it seemed to have anything to do with a boogeyman. Eventually the boogeyman does show up finally towards the end. A lot of people felt it was overly CGI'd. Maybe so... I wouldn't argue, but the boogeyman did look pretty creepy in my opinion. I honestly can't tell you how the hell the main character defeated the boogeyman. It was kind of bizarre and I can see how some would find it silly. It was a bit over the top if anything. But I'm just still not sure what happened.
Then again Fulci's "City of the Living Dead" is one of my favorite horror films and that ending still leaves me scratching my head to this day...
"Boogeyman" isn't exactly in this vein but just slightly and it's far from a horror masterpiece, but it isn't the conventional standard 'horror' flick manufactured by Hollywood either. The score is really well composed which compliments many of the atmospheric moments this film has to offer.
The first 30 minutes I found to be quite unsettling. I can relate to being in the bed in the dark looking at something across the room that resembles someone standing there looking at you. We've all been there. What happens in this movie is exactly what we've always feared that something would do.
Moments like these really stood out.
The middle isn't as strong as the beginning or even the confusing ending but the entire film has an unsettling feel about it. Never a joyous moment. There are a lot of flashy camera movements which have gained a popularity amongst most horror films these days. Honestly I'm not a big fan of these MTV style techniques. Ultimately it's the main factor in why I felt it could have been a better film. I can take a certain amount of it but this movie just had a bit too much of it. And every time the dude touched a door knob you just knew there was going to be a noisy flashback sequence. Also, I'm not sure if I can take anymore little kids trying to be all creepy and scary in horror films. It's cliché' and frankly I'm a little sick of it.
At one point I started to wonder how the boogeyman played into all of this other than the precredit sequence. There seemed to be a great deal of possible psychic phenomena within the central character and none of it seemed to have anything to do with a boogeyman. Eventually the boogeyman does show up finally towards the end. A lot of people felt it was overly CGI'd. Maybe so... I wouldn't argue, but the boogeyman did look pretty creepy in my opinion. I honestly can't tell you how the hell the main character defeated the boogeyman. It was kind of bizarre and I can see how some would find it silly. It was a bit over the top if anything. But I'm just still not sure what happened.
Then again Fulci's "City of the Living Dead" is one of my favorite horror films and that ending still leaves me scratching my head to this day...
Tell Your Friends