Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
This early and influential film noir is good, but it's not the best of the genre...
2 October 2023
As is often the case, the reputation of something can be so great, that it becomes difficult in reality to meet the expectations such regard can create. Perhaps this was a factor that shaped my opinion about 'Double Indemnity', and I therefore should be mindful of that when judging this movie. I liked and enjoyed it, which my rating intends to convey. But there were a couple of aspects that slightly disappointed me as well.

Modern viewers probably need to recognise and keep in mind, a couple of important contextual points regarding this movie. Firstly, its subject material, plot and characters - particularly the portrayal of a woman of questionable virtue - had become rare for an A-level feature film in the United States, after the enforcement of the Production Code in 1934. Secondly, its commercial success proved that the movie-going public had an appetite for the genre, encouraging the industry to create the numerous imitators which soon followed.

One could draw a parallel that this movie did in 1944, what Pulp Fiction (1994) did fifty years later. They both pushed the boundaries of what was palatable subject material, introducing new edgy dialogue and interactions between the characters, creating a new kind of "Cool" for their respective eras.

I was disappointed with Fred MacMurray's lead performance, but it should be noted that my opinion here is definitely in the minority. I felt his efforts weren't very natural, especially in his scenes with Barbara Stanwyck, who came across as more comfortable in her role. Edward G. Robinson was unsurprisingly brilliant, and of these three mentioned stood out the most.

Most people will enjoy this movie, and plenty will go much further with their praise. I personally rate it a fair way short of the greatest films noir, but of course, that is a very high bar indeed.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Can happiness and pleasure truly exist, when sadness and pain does not? A good but not excellent adaptation, of a science fiction classic...
6 August 2023
Despite only being loosely based on Aldous Huxley's masterpiece, the key themes are explored here in this solid adaptation. It is worth your time, and not merely another "Sexed up drama", as I've seen being suggested. To be clear, sex was an important element of the plot in the original novel. However, it is handled proportionately here, and it's certainly not exploited or overplayed.

The makers have done an admirable job with this version. It is clearly aimed at a wider general audience, rather than merely fans of science fiction or serious philosophy. The dystopia presented here is not as detailed, nor as dark and heavy, as we read in Huxley's original vision. The flip side to this unsurprisingly, is a sacrifice in character development. You likely will notice some situations repeating and conversations revisited. However, I never felt it became tedious or wearisome.

The performances are strong overall, with Jessica Brown Findlay standing out as the pivotal Lenina Crowne. She capably brings both sensuality as well as a hard edge to her character. I agree with other assessments regarding the pilot episode, which is perhaps the weakest episode of the entire series. If you treat it as merely an introduction to this science fiction world, you will be rewarded with the interesting story that follows.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed